@Elektrego; Okay, that does link beer with poetry...I stand corrected on that.
Top Ash (and Wrex)


Ash: 'Pfft, You come at me Brogan!'
Modifié par Mr. Brainheart, 09 septembre 2011 - 11:22 .


Modifié par Mr. Brainheart, 09 septembre 2011 - 11:22 .
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAMr. Brainheart wrote...
Top Ash (and Wrex)
Ash: 'Pfft, You come at me Brogan!'
ADLegend21 wrote...
and here you are badpie!
Guest_elektrego_*
Mr. Brainheart wrote...
@Elektrego; Okay, that does link beer with poetry...I stand corrected on that.
Guest_Future Guy_*
Yet it's used so often...jlb524 wrote...
To be honest, the things you mentioned are so ridiculous the 'real life' argument isn't even necessary.
I know self-serving hypocrisy when I see it.jlb524 wrote...
Plus, these are also not the only counter-arguments given. The analogy isn't all that great.
As if the characters have announced their sexuality. And of course you can use this line of reasoning with all of the characters, and I imagine that you do. Fortuitously perhaps?jlb524 wrote...
The only counter argument needed is: Ash hasn't been shown in game to be 'not-bisexual'. It's simple logic.
Evidently not.I know self-serving hypocrisy when I see it.
Generally speaking, serial killers show a more distinct set of traits than bisexuals, though it's not universal. It's theoretically possible, but I suspect it'd be seriously hard to get away with while a soldier and not a Spectre.Abscence of evidence isn't indicative of a character's traits. I want Ashley to be a serial killer. Ash hasn't been shown in game to 'not be a serial killer'. Logical?
They were too scared to implement it in ME1 and she wasn't romanceable in ME2, so it's down to them to show the conclusion in ME3. More logical.The writer has the task of showing that Ashley is bisexual, not that she is 'not-bisexual'. The character is romancable, yet not romanceable by either gender. Conclusion, Ashley was written as a heterosexual character, not a bi-sexual character. Seems logical.
Guest_Future Guy_*
Are we using real world examples, now?Xilizhra wrote...Generally speaking, serial killers show a more distinct set of traits than bisexuals, though it's not universal.
Baseless assumption. How is it logical, since they've included the content in their games going back a number of years, and prior to and after the ME series?Xilizhra wrote...They were too scared to implement it in ME1 and she wasn't romanceable in ME2, so it's down to them to show the conclusion in ME3. More logical.
Modifié par Future Guy, 10 septembre 2011 - 12:07 .
As opposed to what?Are we using real world examples, now?
Generally only as one romance, and that was Liara this time. It only went beyond one in DA2.Baseless assumption. How is it logical, since they've included the content in their games going back a number of years, and prior to and after the ME series.
This statement regarding different things being different is indeed correct. We thank you for this observation.I would like to point out that it is one thing to have a different opinion and another thing entirely to insult them. Not pointed at Future Guy or people he is arguing with but at others who have been name calling.
Modifié par Xilizhra, 10 septembre 2011 - 12:08 .
Mr_Commander_Shepard wrote...
Ashley
Guest_Future Guy_*
a: "People change in real life, their sexuality is not set in stone. People come out of the closet."Xilizhra wrote...As opposed to what?
Generally? And this explains that "they were too scared to implement it in ME1"? Ok.Xilizhra wrote...Generally only as one romance, and that was Liara this time. It only went beyond one in DA2.
Modifié par Future Guy, 10 septembre 2011 - 12:19 .
Not in this thread, at any rate.Man, nothing quite like being crass and patronizing to people being reasonable.
What this ultimately boils down to is that your desire to not be exposed to anyone hitting on you is fundamentally lesser than others' desire to have romances that they can enjoy. The total amount of enjoyment that they can derive from the game will be greater than the total amount you would reasonably lose from this.a: "People change in real life, their sexuality is not set in stone. People come out of the closet."
b: "I don't like everyone coming on to me."
a: "This happens in real life, just deal with it."
b: "But everybody is bisexual"a: "It's just a game, it's not reality!"
Modifié par Xilizhra, 10 septembre 2011 - 12:21 .

Mr. Brainheart wrote...
...I beg to differ, first of have you played as femshep and been friends with Ashley, there are some moments that you can feel a spark between them, a certain intimacy that goes beyond normal friendship. You can argue this is because she would originally intended S/S but then they didn't make that happen. Regardless it is there atleast for some of us in this thread (and I'm pretty sure that goes for more people.)
NICKjnp wrote...
I'm making the assumption that monotheistic beliefs teach against it. That is known. To have a character that is so monotheistic in her beliefs to all of a sudden is an epic retcon and they might as well just completely remove that aspect from her character.
Modifié par xxSgt_Reed_24xx, 10 septembre 2011 - 12:29 .
Future Guy wrote...
Yet it's used so often...jlb524 wrote...
To be honest, the things you mentioned are so ridiculous the 'real life' argument isn't even necessary.I know self-serving hypocrisy when I see it.jlb524 wrote...
Plus, these are also not the only counter-arguments given. The analogy isn't all that great.
Future Guy wrote...
As if the characters have announced their sexuality. And of course you can use this line of reasoning with all of the characters, and I imagine that you do. Fortuitously perhaps?
Future Guy wrote...
Abscence of evidence isn't indicative of a character's traits. I want Ashley to be a serial killer. Ash hasn't been shown in game to 'not be a serial killer'. Logical?
Future Guy wrote...
The writer has the task of showing that Ashley is bisexual, not that she is 'not-bisexual'. The character is romancable, yet not romanceable by either gender. Conclusion, Ashley was written as a heterosexual character, not a bi-sexual character. Seems logical.
Guest_Future Guy_*
It boils down to self-serving hypocrisy. If one wants the content in the game, then fine. That's one thing. Using reality as part of one's argument to marginalize others, and then dismissing reality after the fact, (all LIs being bisexual), when the end result is not based on reality at all.Xilizhra wrote...
What this ultimately boils down to is that your desire to not be exposed to anyone hitting on you is fundamentally lesser than others' desire to have romances that they can enjoy. The total amount of enjoyment that they can derive from the game will be greater than the total amount you would reasonably lose from this.
Your argument right now certainly isn't based in reality, given that not all of the LIs in-game are bisexual, and not even close to all the humans are.It boils down to self-serving hypocrisy. If one wants the content in the game, then fine. That's one thing. Using reality as part of one's argument to marginalize others, and then dismissing reality after the fact, (all LIs being bisexual), when the end result is not based on reality at all.
xxSgt_Reed_24xx wrote...
Mr. Brainheart wrote...
...I beg to differ, first of have you played as femshep and been friends with Ashley, there are some moments that you can feel a spark between them, a certain intimacy that goes beyond normal friendship. You can argue this is because she would originally intended S/S but then they didn't make that happen. Regardless it is there atleast for some of us in this thread (and I'm pretty sure that goes for more people.)
As someone who doesn't mind the s/s romance option for Ashley (and has a gibbed playthrough as a second shepard)....
I never felt a "spark" b/w Ashley and FemShep... to me, that's just wishful thinking on those people's part.
[
Well, considering her attitude changes by the end of a Paragon ME1 playthrough, I suspect it will have softened more seeing as how she'll be spending a lot more time with nonhumans as a Spectre. Proximity breeds understanding, except in the most hardened and ignorant of ideologues.Xilizhra wrote...
On a different note, how do you think Ashely's attitude toward nonhumans has changed, if it all?
Guest_Future Guy_*
The DA2 forums will suffice.Xilizhra wrote...
Your argument right now certainly isn't based in reality, given that not all of the LIs in-game are bisexual, and not even close to all the humans are.It boils down to self-serving hypocrisy. If one wants the content in the game, then fine. That's one thing. Using reality as part of one's argument to marginalize others, and then dismissing reality after the fact, (all LIs being bisexual), when the end result is not based on reality at all.
I think in her work as or to become a spectre she gains trust of Aliens. I have her go witht eh STG unit on Virmire and that should also have a great deal in her trusting them since they were efficient and got the job done while working with her. Also if she's with them and Kirahe dies she becomes their leader until the end of the mission.Xilizhra wrote...
On a different note, how do you think Ashely's attitude toward nonhumans has changed, if it all?