hotdogbsg wrote...
Aurora313 wrote...
Yea. I agree with Hotdogbsg, it's slightly terrible to have a decision like that. And my god, how many times has that cliche been pulled off? Its boring, old, predicable and frankly if it happens, I'm just gonna put the game down and walk away. I didn't sacrifice Kaiden, stay loyal in 2 only to lose Ash in the third.
And you'd be losing the LI either way.
Even if you choose to let them live I'd doubt they'd be happy with the death of all those people on their conscience.
Every fan thread has this same worry about their LI being the [place LI name here] vs [place person/place/thing here].
Given that there are a million LI's (ok, a slight overexaggeration
This time around I would think that the choice would be on a more grand level ... geth vs quarian for example.
Individuals could be at risk like the SM in ME2 but even then you could bring all of them through.
CHud wrote today when talking about being successful in ME3 - "In ME2 greater success meant more survivors. Same, on a bigger scale, for ME3."
TOP .... "Virmire this!"
Modifié par PMC65, 12 octobre 2011 - 11:33 .





Retour en haut





