Tali'Zorah ME3 Thread *MAJOR SPOILER WARNING!*
#28226
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 01:20
Mac Walters (lead)
Neil Pollner (senior
They ruined ME3, or sat back and let it be ruined. Awful for the series either way.
#28227
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 01:54
Keelah Se'lai.
#28228
Guest_Calinstel_*
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 02:19
Guest_Calinstel_*
Scopes should not even be a concern. The quarian masks/visors could have direct datafeeds from the scope of any weapon to them rendering even the need to look at the weapon pointless let alone having to look 'down' a scope. My Navel career showed, at least aboard a submarine, that the shotgun and small arms are the best combination. Now, topside is another matter.Bfler wrote...
Dilandau3000 wrote...
Yeah, that's a good point. Shotgun is a good weapon for close-quarters shipboard combat, like the Alarei mission.Calinstel wrote...
Um, Navy ships use lots of shotguns. Usually, the targets are fairly
close quarters so long range weapons are pointless. Also, a shotgun
blast is less likely to punch a hole in your outer hull.
(real answers here)
An assault rifle would also do this.
In my opinion the only practical explanation for her not to use a sniper riflle is that it could be difficult to look through the scope with her mask.
#28229
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 02:22
Calinstel wrote...
Scopes should not even be a concern. The quarian masks/visors could have direct datafeeds from the scope of any weapon to them rendering even the need to look at the weapon pointless let alone having to look 'down' a scope. My Navel career showed, at least aboard a submarine, that the shotgun and small arms are the best combination. Now, topside is another matter.
The time where one took out enemy crew with long range rifles are quite over, I admit. Ah, the days. Back in the 1500, when we used the muskets to clear the deck...
Also, if a quarian mask could link up to the scope - couldn't you then accurately fire from the hip?
#28230
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 02:25
TrueMadayar wrote...
Calinstel wrote...
Scopes should not even be a concern. The quarian masks/visors could have direct datafeeds from the scope of any weapon to them rendering even the need to look at the weapon pointless let alone having to look 'down' a scope. My Navel career showed, at least aboard a submarine, that the shotgun and small arms are the best combination. Now, topside is another matter.
The time where one took out enemy crew with long range rifles are quite over, I admit. Ah, the days. Back in the 1500, when we used the muskets to clear the deck...
Also, if a quarian mask could link up to the scope - couldn't you then accurately fire from the hip?
Well yes, I would assume that all advanced armour in the mass effect univeres has systems like that, but I assume its good practice to hold the weapon in a controled possition even if you don't look down the scope.
And in 1500 ships still carried longbows
Modifié par BigglesFlysAgain, 01 avril 2012 - 02:27 .
#28231
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 02:30
BigglesFlysAgain wrote...
Well yes, I would assume that all advanced armour in the mass effect univeres has systems like that, but I assume its good practice to hold the weapon in a controled possition even if you don't look down the scope.
And in 1500 ships still carried longbows
Wonder why. A Magnetic Accelerator Weapon shouldn't have a kickback anymore, anyway.
Actually, crossbows were easier to store. But the more advanced had already flintlock guns. I remember it as if it was yesterday...
#28232
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 02:30
Plus of course you can't romance Tali unless you started it in ME2, so another thing that relies on the previous games. Not that I have a problem with that, it just shows how well it worked making use of those things and how they messed up by largely abandoning that approach after the Rannoch story arc. They had all the tools there, they just needed to put more time into making it work.
#28233
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 02:31
Modifié par lomifeh, 01 avril 2012 - 02:33 .
#28234
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 02:34
ME3 cartoon - featuring Tali (she is the vocal of our band ! )
#28235
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 02:34
undyinghunter wrote...
darthrevaninlight wrote...
mauro,mauro2222 wrote...
undyinghunter wrote...
I dont mean an in-game wedding, maybe just mention it in an epilouge and have a proposal in the final battle conversation or in the conversation before the assualt on the Cerberus base.
No! I don't want anything related to weddings. I'm selfish, I demand it.
y u no want wedding?shep+tali+family+houseonRannoch?
Thank you Revan. Im a sucker for endings like that, glad to see Im not alone.
LOL
Wedding = Shep+Tali+House?
I didn't knew that quarians were so strict.
Shala: You need to... "marry" with this human in order to have properties. Even if it's only a human custom.
#28236
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 02:36
I thought that the idea that dark energy was supposed to be a big thing had already been debunked? Or at least, Karpyshyn denied it was ever part of the grand plan.lomifeh wrote...
Stuff that survived the original idea regarding Dark Energy was carried through the best since it may have already had a framework. I am more and more convinced the lost of Drew K hurt things in a deeper way than I thought it would.
#28237
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 02:46
#28238
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 02:50
We don't even know if they have weddings, do we?zim1017 wrote...
Anyone thought of how Quarians dress for weddings? No way they don't have some sort of ceremonial clothes for that, likely handed down to conserve resources of course, but that kind of makes it more special.
#28239
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 02:51
TrueMadayar wrote...
Wonder why. A Magnetic Accelerator Weapon shouldn't have a kickback anymore, anyway.
Um, what? Every action has an equal and opposite reaction, something like that? Yes, they should still have recoil.
#28240
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 02:51
exelsis wrote...
At this point, I'd rather than the ending was me, holding tali close after the harbinger attack, just embracing her as we both die. Better than the crap bioware gave us. At least this way we are together.
I could see that...
Shep:Tali... I...
Tali:I know, and I've got you...
@sadface
#28241
Guest_Calinstel_*
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 02:53
Guest_Calinstel_*
Well, yes. It should be a possibility. Heck, we have fancy weapons system now that allow the user to have a weapons eye view. At least, as shown in ME3, the space tech finally evolved to allow Shepard to record meetings. Now, they just need to work on the tech that allows video.TrueMadayar wrote...
Calinstel wrote...
Scopes should not even be a concern. The quarian masks/visors could have direct datafeeds from the scope of any weapon to them rendering even the need to look at the weapon pointless let alone having to look 'down' a scope. My Navel career showed, at least aboard a submarine, that the shotgun and small arms are the best combination. Now, topside is another matter.
The time where one took out enemy crew with long range rifles are quite over, I admit. Ah, the days. Back in the 1500, when we used the muskets to clear the deck...
Also, if a quarian mask could link up to the scope - couldn't you then accurately fire from the hip?
#28242
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 02:59
Unschuld wrote...
TrueMadayar wrote...
Wonder why. A Magnetic Accelerator Weapon shouldn't have a kickback anymore, anyway.
Um, what? Every action has an equal and opposite reaction, something like that? Yes, they should still have recoil.
Yep, codex states that recoil is the main limiting factor in weapon power.
#28243
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 03:02
zim1017 wrote...
Anyone thought of how Quarians dress for weddings? No way they don't have some sort of ceremonial clothes for that, likely handed down to conserve resources of course, but that kind of makes it more special.

http://t0.gstatic.co...WrG203tYJKZd7tA
#28244
Guest_Calinstel_*
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 03:03
Guest_Calinstel_*
Okay, that ending would have turned this 54 year old into a sobbing mess.Cheese of Borg wrote...
exelsis wrote...
At this point, I'd rather than the ending was me, holding tali close after the harbinger attack, just embracing her as we both die. Better than the crap bioware gave us. At least this way we are together.
I could see that...
Shep:Tali... I...
Tali:I know, and I've got you...
@sadface
(Damn you, I can actually picture that scene AND hear Tali saying the words.)
#28245
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 03:05
Dilandau3000 wrote...
We don't even know if they have weddings, do we?zim1017 wrote...
Anyone thought of how Quarians dress for weddings? No way they don't have some sort of ceremonial clothes for that, likely handed down to conserve resources of course, but that kind of makes it more special.
We don't actually, but we do know their relationships to their parents are relatively like ours, so I couldn't imagine they don't have some sort of binding relationship status, they're not Salarians after all.
#28246
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 03:06
Unschuld wrote...
TrueMadayar wrote...
Wonder why. A Magnetic Accelerator Weapon shouldn't have a kickback anymore, anyway.
Um, what? Every action has an equal and opposite reaction, something like that? Yes, they should still have recoil.
You could probably do something with mass effect fields to absorb the recoil. Either that or space magic.
#28247
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 03:08
bazzag wrote...
zim1017 wrote...
Anyone thought of how Quarians dress for weddings? No way they don't have some sort of ceremonial clothes for that, likely handed down to conserve resources of course, but that kind of makes it more special.
http://t0.gstatic.co...WrG203tYJKZd7tA
The bottom picture is definitely cute, but it's also more a human wedding dress meeting a quarian suit, still interesting to see traditions synthesize. Also, Tali kind of has a ''Ffff... I hate dresses'' look to me.
#28248
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 03:09
Unschuld wrote...
Um, what? Every action has an equal and opposite reaction, something like that? Yes, they should still have recoil.
But why would the kickback of a MAG have to be to the back? I mean, you do not speed the bullet from the back in a MAG, you speed it from the sides. Also, it's magnetic acceleration, the speed comes from different fields, not from a single impact. Truly believe there would not have a kickback anymore.
Must say, as it is, the second and third game got the old single shot guns back to please the players, not that it's all too sensible.
Then again, if Tali could fire her shotgun without drawback, she would rule us.
#28249
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 03:09
Yeah, but permanent partnerships don't necessarily imply wedding ceremonies. I have an aunt and uncle who've been together for decades without being married (they only married a few years ago because they were emigrating, and the legal status of marriage made it easier).zim1017 wrote...
Dilandau3000 wrote...
We don't even know if they have weddings, do we?zim1017 wrote...
Anyone thought of how Quarians dress for weddings? No way they don't have some sort of ceremonial clothes for that, likely handed down to conserve resources of course, but that kind of makes it more special.
We don't actually, but we do know their relationships to their parents are relatively like ours, so I couldn't imagine they don't have some sort of binding relationship status, they're not Salarians after all.
#28250
Posté 01 avril 2012 - 03:10
zim1017 wrote...
Dilandau3000 wrote...
We don't even know if they have weddings, do we?zim1017 wrote...
Anyone thought of how Quarians dress for weddings? No way they don't have some sort of ceremonial clothes for that, likely handed down to conserve resources of course, but that kind of makes it more special.
We don't actually, but we do know their relationships to their parents are relatively like ours, so I couldn't imagine they don't have some sort of binding relationship status, they're not Salarians after all.
Given they have to share the small crowded spaces of live ships and they of course need to keep the population going, I imagine they probably have quite strict rules about marriage. I expect iit could be quite disruptive to ship harmony otherwise. It may even be they have arranged marriages with Quarians from other vessles.





Retour en haut




