Aller au contenu

Photo

Tali'Zorah ME3 Thread *MAJOR SPOILER WARNING!*


69153 réponses à ce sujet

#28226
exelsis

exelsis
  • Members
  • 2 088 messages
Know these names. Loathe these names.

Mac Walters (lead)
Neil Pollner (senior

They ruined ME3, or sat back and let it be ruined. Awful for the series either way.

#28227
skwisgaarthegod

skwisgaarthegod
  • Members
  • 869 messages
Well good night/morning guys. My cat is nagging me to go and sleep :P
Keelah Se'lai.

#28228
Guest_Calinstel_*

Guest_Calinstel_*
  • Guests

Bfler wrote...

Dilandau3000 wrote...

Calinstel wrote...

Um, Navy ships use lots of shotguns.  Usually, the targets are fairly
close quarters so long range weapons are pointless.  Also, a shotgun
blast is less likely to punch a hole in your outer hull.
(real answers here)

Yeah, that's a good point. Shotgun is a good weapon for close-quarters shipboard combat, like the Alarei mission.


An assault rifle would also do this.

In my opinion the only practical explanation for her not to use a sniper riflle is that it could be difficult to look through the scope with her mask.

Scopes should not even be a concern.  The quarian masks/visors could have direct datafeeds from the scope of any weapon to them rendering even the need to look at the weapon pointless let alone having to look 'down' a scope.  My Navel career showed, at least aboard a submarine, that the shotgun and small arms are the best combination.  Now, topside is another matter.  :)

#28229
TrueMadayar

TrueMadayar
  • Members
  • 1 599 messages

Calinstel wrote...


Scopes should not even be a concern.  The quarian masks/visors could have direct datafeeds from the scope of any weapon to them rendering even the need to look at the weapon pointless let alone having to look 'down' a scope.  My Navel career showed, at least aboard a submarine, that the shotgun and small arms are the best combination.  Now, topside is another matter.  :)


The time where one took out enemy crew with long range rifles are quite over, I admit. Ah, the days. Back in the 1500, when we used the muskets to clear the deck...

Also, if a quarian mask could link up to the scope - couldn't you then accurately fire from the hip?

#28230
BigglesFlysAgain

BigglesFlysAgain
  • Members
  • 2 279 messages

TrueMadayar wrote...

Calinstel wrote...


Scopes should not even be a concern.  The quarian masks/visors could have direct datafeeds from the scope of any weapon to them rendering even the need to look at the weapon pointless let alone having to look 'down' a scope.  My Navel career showed, at least aboard a submarine, that the shotgun and small arms are the best combination.  Now, topside is another matter.  :)


The time where one took out enemy crew with long range rifles are quite over, I admit. Ah, the days. Back in the 1500, when we used the muskets to clear the deck...

Also, if a quarian mask could link up to the scope - couldn't you then accurately fire from the hip?


Well yes, I would assume that all advanced armour in the mass effect univeres has systems like that, but I assume its good practice to hold the weapon in a controled possition even if you don't look down the scope.

And in 1500 ships still carried longbows :D

Modifié par BigglesFlysAgain, 01 avril 2012 - 02:27 .


#28231
TrueMadayar

TrueMadayar
  • Members
  • 1 599 messages

BigglesFlysAgain wrote...


Well yes, I would assume that all advanced armour in the mass effect univeres has systems like that, but I assume its good practice to hold the weapon in a controled possition even if you don't look down the scope.

And in 1500 ships still carried longbows :D



Wonder why. A Magnetic Accelerator Weapon shouldn't have a kickback anymore, anyway.

Actually, crossbows were easier to store. But the more advanced had already flintlock guns. I remember it as if it was yesterday...

#28232
Fenrisfil

Fenrisfil
  • Members
  • 1 866 messages
It's interesting that the best things in ME3 are things that are essentially carried over from the previous games. While where they've introduced new elements, it seems rushed and half arsed. Tutchanka and Rannoch were three games in the making and they end up miles ahead of the rest of ME3.

Plus of course you can't romance Tali unless you started it in ME2, so another thing that relies on the previous games. Not that I have a problem with that, it just shows how well it worked making use of those things and how they messed up by largely abandoning that approach after the Rannoch story arc. They had all the tools there, they just needed to put more time into making it work.

#28233
lomifeh

lomifeh
  • Members
  • 438 messages
Well besides the fact that it looks cool? A shotgun is less likely to breach a hull.  I did notice that stuff that had it's roots in ME1 seemed to be more fleshed out.  My guess?  Stuff that survived the original idea regarding Dark Energy was carried through the best since it may have already had a framework.  I am more and more convinced the lost of Drew K hurt things in a deeper way than I thought it would.

Modifié par lomifeh, 01 avril 2012 - 02:33 .


#28234
Angmir

Angmir
  • Members
  • 615 messages
Probably been posted hundred times allready but still if you havent seen



ME3 cartoon - featuring Tali (she is the vocal of our band ! )

#28235
mauro2222

mauro2222
  • Members
  • 4 236 messages

undyinghunter wrote...

darthrevaninlight wrote...

mauro2222 wrote...

undyinghunter wrote...

 I dont mean an in-game wedding, maybe just mention it in an epilouge and have a proposal in the final battle conversation or in the conversation before the assualt on the Cerberus base.


No! I don't want anything related to weddings. I'm selfish, I demand it. :pinched:

mauro,
y u no want wedding?:crying: shep+tali+family+houseonRannoch?


Thank you Revan. Im a sucker for endings like that, glad to see Im not alone.


LOL

Wedding = Shep+Tali+House?

I didn't knew that quarians were so strict.

Shala: You need to... "marry" with this human in order to have properties. Even if it's only a human custom.

#28236
Dilandau3000

Dilandau3000
  • Members
  • 2 489 messages

lomifeh wrote...

Stuff that survived the original idea regarding Dark Energy was carried through the best since it may have already had a framework.  I am more and more convinced the lost of Drew K hurt things in a deeper way than I thought it would.

I thought that the idea that dark energy was supposed to be a big thing had already been debunked? Or at least, Karpyshyn denied it was ever part of the grand plan.

#28237
zim1017

zim1017
  • Members
  • 291 messages
Anyone thought of how Quarians dress for weddings? No way they don't have some sort of ceremonial clothes for that, likely handed down to conserve resources of course, but that kind of makes it more special.

#28238
Dilandau3000

Dilandau3000
  • Members
  • 2 489 messages

zim1017 wrote...

Anyone thought of how Quarians dress for weddings? No way they don't have some sort of ceremonial clothes for that, likely handed down to conserve resources of course, but that kind of makes it more special.

We don't even know if they have weddings, do we?

#28239
Unschuld

Unschuld
  • Members
  • 3 468 messages

TrueMadayar wrote...

Wonder why. A Magnetic Accelerator Weapon shouldn't have a kickback anymore, anyway.




Um, what? Every action has an equal and opposite reaction, something like that? Yes, they should still have recoil. 

#28240
Cheese of Borg

Cheese of Borg
  • Members
  • 1 298 messages

exelsis wrote...

At this point, I'd rather than the ending was me, holding tali close after the harbinger attack, just embracing her as we both die. Better than the crap bioware gave us. At least this way we are together.


I could see that...
Shep:Tali... I...
Tali:I know, and I've got you...

@sadface

#28241
Guest_Calinstel_*

Guest_Calinstel_*
  • Guests

TrueMadayar wrote...

Calinstel wrote...


Scopes should not even be a concern.  The quarian masks/visors could have direct datafeeds from the scope of any weapon to them rendering even the need to look at the weapon pointless let alone having to look 'down' a scope.  My Navel career showed, at least aboard a submarine, that the shotgun and small arms are the best combination.  Now, topside is another matter.  :)


The time where one took out enemy crew with long range rifles are quite over, I admit. Ah, the days. Back in the 1500, when we used the muskets to clear the deck...

Also, if a quarian mask could link up to the scope - couldn't you then accurately fire from the hip?

Well, yes.  It should be a possibility.  Heck, we have fancy weapons system now that allow the user to have a weapons eye view.  At least, as shown in ME3, the space tech finally evolved to allow Shepard to record meetings.  Now, they just need to work on the tech that allows video.  :)

#28242
BigglesFlysAgain

BigglesFlysAgain
  • Members
  • 2 279 messages

Unschuld wrote...

TrueMadayar wrote...

Wonder why. A Magnetic Accelerator Weapon shouldn't have a kickback anymore, anyway.




Um, what? Every action has an equal and opposite reaction, something like that? Yes, they should still have recoil. 



Yep, codex states that recoil is the main limiting factor in weapon power.

#28243
bazzag

bazzag
  • Members
  • 3 147 messages

zim1017 wrote...

Anyone thought of how Quarians dress for weddings? No way they don't have some sort of ceremonial clothes for that, likely handed down to conserve resources of course, but that kind of makes it more special.


Image IPB
http://t0.gstatic.co...WrG203tYJKZd7tA
Image IPB

#28244
Guest_Calinstel_*

Guest_Calinstel_*
  • Guests

Cheese of Borg wrote...

exelsis wrote...

At this point, I'd rather than the ending was me, holding tali close after the harbinger attack, just embracing her as we both die. Better than the crap bioware gave us. At least this way we are together.


I could see that...
Shep:Tali... I...
Tali:I know, and I've got you...

@sadface

Okay, that ending would have turned this 54 year old into a sobbing mess.
(Damn you, I can actually picture that scene AND hear Tali saying the words.) :(

#28245
zim1017

zim1017
  • Members
  • 291 messages

Dilandau3000 wrote...

zim1017 wrote...

Anyone thought of how Quarians dress for weddings? No way they don't have some sort of ceremonial clothes for that, likely handed down to conserve resources of course, but that kind of makes it more special.

We don't even know if they have weddings, do we?


We don't actually, but we do know their relationships to their parents are relatively like ours, so I couldn't imagine they don't have some sort of binding relationship status, they're not Salarians after all.

#28246
Fenrisfil

Fenrisfil
  • Members
  • 1 866 messages

Unschuld wrote...

TrueMadayar wrote...

Wonder why. A Magnetic Accelerator Weapon shouldn't have a kickback anymore, anyway.


Um, what? Every action has an equal and opposite reaction, something like that? Yes, they should still have recoil. 


You could probably do something with mass effect fields to absorb the recoil. Either that or space magic.

#28247
zim1017

zim1017
  • Members
  • 291 messages

bazzag wrote...

zim1017 wrote...

Anyone thought of how Quarians dress for weddings? No way they don't have some sort of ceremonial clothes for that, likely handed down to conserve resources of course, but that kind of makes it more special.


Image IPB
http://t0.gstatic.co...WrG203tYJKZd7tA
Image IPB


The bottom picture is definitely cute, but it's also more a human wedding dress meeting a quarian suit, still interesting to see traditions synthesize. Also, Tali kind of has a ''Ffff... I hate dresses'' look to me.

#28248
TrueMadayar

TrueMadayar
  • Members
  • 1 599 messages

Unschuld wrote...


Um, what? Every action has an equal and opposite reaction, something like that? Yes, they should still have recoil. 


But why would the kickback of a MAG have to be to the back? I mean, you do not speed the bullet from the back in a MAG, you speed it from the sides. Also, it's magnetic acceleration, the speed comes from different fields, not from a single impact. Truly believe there would not have a kickback anymore.

Must say, as it is, the second and third game got the old single shot guns back to please the players, not that it's all too sensible.

Then again, if Tali could fire her shotgun without drawback, she would rule us.

#28249
Dilandau3000

Dilandau3000
  • Members
  • 2 489 messages

zim1017 wrote...

Dilandau3000 wrote...

zim1017 wrote...

Anyone thought of how Quarians dress for weddings? No way they don't have some sort of ceremonial clothes for that, likely handed down to conserve resources of course, but that kind of makes it more special.

We don't even know if they have weddings, do we?


We don't actually, but we do know their relationships to their parents are relatively like ours, so I couldn't imagine they don't have some sort of binding relationship status, they're not Salarians after all.

Yeah, but permanent partnerships don't necessarily imply wedding ceremonies. I have an aunt and uncle who've been together for decades without being married (they only married a few years ago because they were emigrating, and the legal status of marriage made it easier).

#28250
Fenrisfil

Fenrisfil
  • Members
  • 1 866 messages

zim1017 wrote...

Dilandau3000 wrote...

zim1017 wrote...

Anyone thought of how Quarians dress for weddings? No way they don't have some sort of ceremonial clothes for that, likely handed down to conserve resources of course, but that kind of makes it more special.

We don't even know if they have weddings, do we?


We don't actually, but we do know their relationships to their parents are relatively like ours, so I couldn't imagine they don't have some sort of binding relationship status, they're not Salarians after all.


Given they have to share the small crowded spaces of live ships and they of course need to keep the population going, I imagine they probably have quite strict rules about marriage. I expect iit could be quite disruptive to ship harmony otherwise. It may even be they have arranged marriages with Quarians from other vessles.