69153 réponses à ce sujet

[Cro730]

My friend chose to side with the geth.
I got very angry at him...

[Vistanti]

Cro730 wrote...

My friend chose to side with the geth.
I got very angry at him...

Can't say that I'd blame you for that. If my friend did that, I might have to throw him off that cliff instead...

[Maderek]

Vistanti wrote...

God, why did they even have the possibility of letting Tali commit suicide in ME3? Just watched that scene on YouTube and it gave me massive goosebumps and chills down my spine. I gotta hand it to Bioware, as much as I abhor the idea of Tali dying, they pulled that scene off hauntingly well. *Shudders* *Starts chugging a bottle of Bacardi 151*

I watched that scene the other night on YouTube. It literally killed my mood for the entire night.

I mean, it's not like it happened in my game or anything, but still completely filled my mind with ****.

[Hypnotix0000]

Vistanti wrote...

God, why did they even have the possibility of letting Tali commit suicide in ME3? Just watched that scene on YouTube and it gave me massive goosebumps and chills down my spine. I gotta hand it to Bioware, as much as I abhor the idea of Tali dying, they pulled that scene of hauntingly well. *Shudders* *Starts chugging a bottle of Bacardi 151*

It feels like most of the "closure" we were promised came in the form of death, away from the ending. Most major characters were expendable by the end of this game, in some alternate tangent, and a LOT of secondaries just get a message on the terminal, like in ME2. *sigh*

It's almost as if they WANTED to kill everyone off, and didn't expect for anyone to keep so many "variables" alive for the end-game finale.<_<

*drains refill*

It's sad when budgets/timeline conflict with content quality.

[Olueq]

lol, all my friends dislike Tali. Well, not necessarily dislike, but they all wanted to side with the geth (they all got peace though. Thank ****ing ****).

Modifié par Olueq, 24 mars 2012 - 12:08 .

[nitefyre410]

Cro730 wrote...

My friend chose to side with the geth.
I got very angry at him...

 


I was so damn Happy when I say those blue and red  dialogue options show up...OMG.    So happy I  did a fist pump because I was looking at the regular options like... "This is not going to end well" 

[Naltair]

Hypnotix0000 wrote...

Vistanti wrote...

God, why did they even have the possibility of letting Tali commit suicide in ME3? Just watched that scene on YouTube and it gave me massive goosebumps and chills down my spine. I gotta hand it to Bioware, as much as I abhor the idea of Tali dying, they pulled that scene of hauntingly well. *Shudders* *Starts chugging a bottle of Bacardi 151*

It feels like most of the "closure" we were promised came in the form of death, away from the ending. Most major characters were expendable by the end of this game, in some alternate tangent, and a LOT of secondaries just get a message on the terminal, like in ME2. *sigh*

It's almost as if they WANTED to kill everyone off, and didn't expect for anyone to keep so many "variables" alive for the end-game finale.<_<

*drains refill*

It's sad when budgets/timeline conflict with content quality.

You sir are killing my buzz.

[Olueq]

Why did Bioware try to make us feel so sympathetic to the geth? All the rannoch missions felt so biased. Notice how they never show you any quarian children on the fleet? Also, why is siding with the quarians the renegade option (or at least implied)?

Modifié par Olueq, 24 mars 2012 - 12:12 .

[Maderek]

Olueq wrote...

Why did Bioware try to make us feel so sympathetic to the geth? All the rannoch missions felt so biased. Notice how they never show you any quarian children on the fleet?

Olueq wrote...

Notice how they never show you any quarian children on the fleet?

Olueq wrote...

quarian children

Olueq wrote...

children

There is only ONE.

[Olueq]

Maderek wrote...

Olueq wrote...

Why did Bioware try to make us feel so sympathetic to the geth? All the rannoch missions felt so biased. Notice how they never show you any quarian children on the fleet?

Olueq wrote...

Notice how they never show you any quarian children on the fleet?

Olueq wrote...

quarian children

Olueq wrote...

children

There is only ONE.

You mean harbinger? I assume its harbinger anyway.

Modifié par Olueq, 24 mars 2012 - 12:14 .

[Hypnotix0000]

Naltair wrote...

Hypnotix0000 wrote...

Vistanti wrote...

God, why did they even have the possibility of letting Tali commit suicide in ME3? Just watched that scene on YouTube and it gave me massive goosebumps and chills down my spine. I gotta hand it to Bioware, as much as I abhor the idea of Tali dying, they pulled that scene of hauntingly well. *Shudders* *Starts chugging a bottle of Bacardi 151*

It feels like most of the "closure" we were promised came in the form of death, away from the ending. Most major characters were expendable by the end of this game, in some alternate tangent, and a LOT of secondaries just get a message on the terminal, like in ME2. *sigh*

It's almost as if they WANTED to kill everyone off, and didn't expect for anyone to keep so many "variables" alive for the end-game finale.<_<

*drains refill*

It's sad when budgets/timeline conflict with content quality.

You sir are killing my buzz.

:?mah bad. I'm not sloshed enough yet, apparently.

So... change of topic, when did Tali first capivate your adventure? Right from the start for me. SO amped when she was confirmed LI in ME2.

[Maderek]

Olueq wrote...

Maderek wrote...

Olueq wrote...

Why did Bioware try to make us feel so sympathetic to the geth? All the rannoch missions felt so biased. Notice how they never show you any quarian children on the fleet?

Olueq wrote...

Notice how they never show you any quarian children on the fleet?

Olueq wrote...

quarian children

Olueq wrote...

children

There is only ONE.

You mean harbinger? I assume its harbinger anyway.

Nah, just some dork who makes reapers and kills organics in his spare time.

EDIT: oh damn it, im at the top of the page. excuse me for moment



Excuse the random pic from a google search, I don't really have any Tali pictures on my computer that isn't porn.

Modifié par Maderek, 24 mars 2012 - 12:26 .

[Geckilian]

Right, picked up in total Zaeed, Garrus, Mordin, Jack and Kasumi now in ME2.

Slight confession though - though I've owned ME1 and 2 since release, I started playing with ME3. As such, in 2 how far in to the main game does recruiting Tali become available?

[Olueq]

Maderek wrote...

Olueq wrote...

Maderek wrote...

Olueq wrote...

Why did Bioware try to make us feel so sympathetic to the geth? All the rannoch missions felt so biased. Notice how they never show you any quarian children on the fleet?

Olueq wrote...

Notice how they never show you any quarian children on the fleet?

Olueq wrote...

quarian children

Olueq wrote...

children

There is only ONE.

You mean harbinger? I assume its harbinger anyway.

Nah, just some dork who makes reapers and kills organics in his spare time.

EDIT: oh damn it, im at the top of the page. excuse me for moment

I find it funny how shepard gets so upset over one dumb kid dying, yet doesnt care about 300 000 batarians, or all the renegade options of killing people. Seriously, it has to be indoctrination or it does not make sense.

[Olueq]

Geckilian wrote...

Right, picked up in total Zaeed, Garrus, Mordin, Jack and Kasumi now in ME2.

Slight confession though - though I've owned ME1 and 2 since release, I started playing with ME3. As such, in 2 how far in to the main game does recruiting Tali become available?

After Horizon. So after you recruit Grunt now.

[Maderek]

Geckilian wrote...

Right, picked up in total Zaeed, Garrus, Mordin, Jack and Kasumi now in ME2.

Slight confession though - though I've owned ME1 and 2 since release, I started playing with ME3. As such, in 2 how far in to the main game does recruiting Tali become available?

After what's considered the second half. After recruiting the first four squad-members, and a doing a main mission, you should be able to go on a daring mission on a very sunny planet to save Tali. "Priority: Tali in Heat"

[HellBovine]

Cause that kid was special! It was the only child he had seen in his long years of travel.

Modifié par HellBovine, 24 mars 2012 - 12:26 .

[Mr. Big Pimpin]

Olueq wrote...

Why did Bioware try to make us feel so sympathetic to the geth? All the rannoch missions felt so biased. Notice how they never show you any quarian children on the fleet? Also, why is siding with the quarians the renegade option (or at least implied)?

I've been saying/asking the same thing for a while now. My bet is that they wanted roughly equal numbers of people to choose either side, so decided to present a biased view in order to sway more towards the geth. Many people sadly were easily manipulated by this.

[Olueq]

Mr. Big Pimpin wrote...

Olueq wrote...

Why did Bioware try to make us feel so sympathetic to the geth? All the rannoch missions felt so biased. Notice how they never show you any quarian children on the fleet? Also, why is siding with the quarians the renegade option (or at least implied)?

I've been saying/asking the same thing for a while now. My bet is that they wanted roughly equal numbers of people to choose either side, so decided to present a biased view in order to sway more towards the geth. Many people sadly were easily manipulated by this.

I actually thought the same thing. Even though when you actually think about it, siding with the geth makes no sense considering their technology would still exist if they all died, they are a liability (as they can be easily brainwashed), have no emotion, and you would be killing million of innocents. Yet some people are still dumb enough to side with them?

Modifié par Olueq, 24 mars 2012 - 12:33 .

[Olueq]

Obviously peace is still most likely the best option though.

[Maderek]

Olueq wrote...

Mr. Big Pimpin wrote...

Olueq wrote...

Why did Bioware try to make us feel so sympathetic to the geth? All the rannoch missions felt so biased. Notice how they never show you any quarian children on the fleet? Also, why is siding with the quarians the renegade option (or at least implied)?

I've been saying/asking the same thing for a while now. My bet is that they wanted roughly equal numbers of people to choose either side, so decided to present a biased view in order to sway more towards the geth. Many people sadly were easily manipulated by this.

I actually thought the same thing. Even though when you actually think about it, siding with the geth makes no sense considering their technology would still exist, they are a liability as they can be easily brainwashed, have no emotion, and you would be killing million of innocents. Yet some people are still dumb enough to side with them?

"Yeah, why side with the Geth when I can just tell everyone to shut up and make everybody love me?"

Seriously, I don't see the point in anything else when you can just side with everyone.

[Ryuji2]

TrueMadayar wrote...

Well, if Multus or the Doc or some of the other candidates show up, tell them they have the bar. Until then, behave yourselves and help yourselves!

And hold the line. The ending will come. If we have to make it ourselves.

Keelah Se'Lai!

Later man. Keelah Se'lai. I got the bar while you're gone until Doc or Multus shows up.

Also fun thing. One of my friends just got a quarian engineer...then I get one at the same time. Weird.

Anyways, I think the reason they're biased against the quarians is to show that the geth didn't want to fight in the first place and didn't seem to ever have any intention to. Just my two cents.

Modifié par Ryuji2, 24 mars 2012 - 12:33 .

[Olueq]

Maderek wrote...

Olueq wrote...

Mr. Big Pimpin wrote...

Olueq wrote...

Why did Bioware try to make us feel so sympathetic to the geth? All the rannoch missions felt so biased. Notice how they never show you any quarian children on the fleet? Also, why is siding with the quarians the renegade option (or at least implied)?

I've been saying/asking the same thing for a while now. My bet is that they wanted roughly equal numbers of people to choose either side, so decided to present a biased view in order to sway more towards the geth. Many people sadly were easily manipulated by this.

I actually thought the same thing. Even though when you actually think about it, siding with the geth makes no sense considering their technology would still exist, they are a liability as they can be easily brainwashed, have no emotion, and you would be killing million of innocents. Yet some people are still dumb enough to side with them?

"Yeah, why side with the Geth when I can just tell everyone to shut up and make everybody love me?"

Seriously, I don't see the point in anything else when you can just side with everyone.

Obviously, this is if you cant.

[Mr. Big Pimpin]

Olueq wrote...

I actually thought the same thing. Even though when you actually think about it, siding with the geth makes no sense considering their technology would still exist if they all died, they are a liability (as they can be easily brainwashed), have no emotion, and you would be killing million of innocents. Yet some people are still dumb enough to side with them?

That's the problem; people don't think about any of the things you just mentioned.

[HellBovine]

Mr. Big Pimpin wrote...

Olueq wrote...

I actually thought the same thing. Even though when you actually think about it, siding with the geth makes no sense considering their technology would still exist if they all died, they are a liability (as they can be easily brainwashed), have no emotion, and you would be killing million of innocents. Yet some people are still dumb enough to side with them?

That's the problem; people don't think about any of the things you just mentioned.

That's the problem; people don't think