ArcanaLegacy wrote...
BubbleSauce wrote...
ArcanaLegacy wrote...
This has been covered b4 but who the new ppl that werent around b4 -
Would you shoot down an indoctrinated Garrus trying to kill you?
I sure as hell wouldnt. Or least not want too. Id capture him and confine him somewhere safe til i figured out how to save his mind or at least til i defeated the reapers. But look what happened with Benezia. Anyone indoctrinated would never be the same. My only theory to break the "spell" is to destroy the root of the control. Hence again - til i defeated the reapers.
Even if you did do that, as the wiki states: The mental damage from indoctrination is severe and permanent. As Shepard saw, the captured salarians on Virmire had been turned into shambling husks, who either attacked on sight or just stood awaiting orders.
And yes, I'd kill him, I'd be sad about it, I feel slightly detatched from the situation now because we're only discussing it, but if it did come to that then of course I'd kill him. He's lost by that point, it'd be more painful for me to see someone I was close to have to continue to exist in that state, than have to see them killed. There are fates worse than death, why do you think Saren put a bullet in his head?
Plus, he's dangerous in that condition, what other choice is there? And do really think shepard will be able to contain and capture garrus if he went feral? Turians are tall and bulky and strong, and the reapers are in control of him by that stage...
And theres no way it can be PERMANENT. Severe yes. But no one knows for sure. Reapers have always existed. Whos to say that the indoctrination cant be broken/severed once theyre gone? Its an interesting theory that I hope gets answered in ME3. Does indoctrination continue to influence those affected even when the reapers are gone? Thats one mystery I want answers for.
Sorry, if that last bit was intergral to your arguement, but I can't read it, spoilers and all...
Why exactly is there no way it can be permanent? Indoctrination is a technology, it isn't magic, (well I don't exactly
know that, but I think we can all agree that it'd be pretty f*cking stupid if it did turn out to be magic) it's much more likely that it actually changes the way the brain functions rather than simply taking control for a little while, and even if it wasn't, like I said, the effects are severe, you saw what happened to the salarians on virmire. It doesn't matter if it still works after the reapers are gone if it causes permanent brain damage, and turns them feral...
Maybe in the early stages it can reversed, as it's stated in the lore, indoctrination is a gradual thing, it doesn't happen immediately, and it is stated in the wiki that the more control over a person a reaper has the less fuctional they become, so I suppose maybe if garrus was indoctrinated it'll lead to the same thing as Saren's indoctrination in which saren made him self so valuable to the reapers that he knew they would never let him get that far. (Hence why he was able to be convinced otherwise at the end of ME1)
Even at that it depends on several differant variables, as in how far into the indoctrination he is, whether or not it can be reversed etc. It's impossible to say whether or not I'd shoot him because I don't know the circumstances. In your post you said that
he'd be trying to kill you. I interpretted that as him being pretty far into the ordeal, shepard means a lot to Garrus, and I should think it'd take a lot of work for the reapers to convince garrus to kill her. Maybe I interpreted in wrongly, whatever. It's impossible to say if you don't specify, but I'll put it plainly.
If he could be reverted back to old garrus then of course I wouldn't, why would I, it makes no sense and I should scarcely think any right minded person
would indeed kill him if they knew the situation could be rectified.
If it was irreversable or if he was left in a state afterwards in which he simply wasn't himself, then yes, I'd kill him, because I don't want to see garrus in a cell, jumping around like a confused ape, knowing that there's nothing that can be done about it, especially if he becomes a danger to others...
Modifié par BubbleSauce, 23 novembre 2011 - 10:44 .