Eradyn wrote...
@Shygravel: I don't think there are any ingame references to Garrus' age. We have to pretty much draw it from conjecture based on what we know of the game's lore and what makes sense logically. But you see in ME1 (and especially in ME3) that...Garrus can't be that young, and indeed it's never even mentioned or implied that he is, in the first game. Indeed, as you stated, Garrus had to have had time to climb the ranks in C-Sec. There's no way they're handing off an investigation on the Citadel's top Spectre to a rookie. No way.
Garrus had to be far enough up the chain of command, and have been there long enough to gain experience and a rep, to be given that responsibility, and he had to have had enough sway to even be able to make demands of those in the control tower regarding Dr. Saleon (and considering Executor Palin was the only one able to countermand him...yeah). And that's not even considering the reality that turians remain on active duty status until the age of 30. I know some like to brush that under the rug, but then you have to start going into head-canon territory. For me, the only thing that makes sense is that he's over 30. Probably well over 30. Nailing down a number would be pure conjecture on my part, but considering what I read in the ME3 dialogue...I think there's something to the idea that Garrus is much older than some think he is. He's been around the block a few times, he knows how the world works, and that's part of why he's so disgusted and disillusioned with politicians and red tape. It's also why he decides to quit and sign on with Shepard, to actually get things done and see how those without the restraints of red tape get things done. Not a sign of youth or naivete, just a sign of someone fed up with the system after working with it long enough.
I agree with you, though; I would love to see BW include something like that in a codex or, better yet, intertwine it with the game. Maybe a "personnel record" or something that Shepard is given. I can dream.
The age thing: Yeah, I've always been suspect of this 'he's younger than 30' stuff that floats around. Wasn't that largely propagated by a tweet or some such from one of the writers? If so I can understand why players have latched on to that idea. It just never made sense to me, so in my headcanon, he's older. Even if he was excused early from military service, pending work on C-Sec (something that in and of itself would indicate either a) His performance in the military was meritorious enough that he was given exception as a boon or

he was shuttled away because of some desire to remove him from the Turian military ---> 'a' makes way more sense to me than 'b') it would still take time to work the ranks in C-Sec and gain the sort of experience that would have them turn to him for investigation of a Specter.
Disillusionment: Garrus being disillusioned with politics and red tape never struck me as a young mans rebelling against authority, but an older persons growing restless and tired of percieved failures and injustices in a system they were raised to believe in/strive for. An itching weariness rather than 'screw y'all, you can't tell me what to do anymore!'.
Has anyone here ever read Starship Troopers? Not the horrible movie (I mean, funny horrible, but horrible) but the book? My husband is a Marine and the book is on the USMC reading list, so he's a huge fan of it and insisted I read it as well. I bring this up because apparently the Turian military was modeled in part off Heinlein's military. The idea of military not just as defensive/offensive forces for a nation, but also encompassing civic duties most modern nations assign to the civilian sector. Heck, in Heinlein's world, one was not even able to attain full citizenship without undergoing military service --> it represented the height of civic worth. (and also fed the military machine, but I'm not here to discuss the real world political/moral implications! *nips that*) My point is that growing up in a society like that generally involves a great deal of indoctrination and propaganda: Some people eventually come to disagree with it. But it's engrained in the makeup and a lot of people who move beyond 'the hype' still hold onto the sense of duty/the basic moral blueprint from which the perceive the world. You even see this in modern military: I've known marines/soldiers/etc who were definitely fed up with certain aspects of the military/how things were handled - the politics, the red tape, etc. A myriad little things that seem to interfere with getting **** done the right way/to good results (sound familiar garrus fans?) -- but most of those people I've known/know still fundamentally believe in the core values they were taught, in the -idea- behind the reality.
^That's how Garrus has always come off to me. A self-proclaimed 'bad turian' -- struggling to bridge the gap between ideas(ideals) and reality and all the crap that goes wrong along the way. But still a product of the society he was raised in, the training he received and still fundamentally bonded to them even if he chooses unorthodox paths to follow.
....
<_<
If that made no sense, I've still only had one cup of coffee. Sorry for the 'wall.