Aller au contenu

Photo

ME3 multiplayer. terrible idea or stroke of geniuse


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
101 réponses à ce sujet

#1
Onilink1230

Onilink1230
  • Members
  • 31 messages
Ok fellow Mass Enthusiests while browsing other forums i have noticed several negative thoughts about Mass Effect 3 having multiplayer. the only good reason i can find is that development resources  will be taken away from making the mass effect single player and thus harm the final product. i agree entirely how ever since some people for what ever reason will not be able to purchase dlc for mass effect 3 the reaper conflict will be resolved at the end of the main story, and BW has already confirmed that they will be making dlc for 3, so i think that BW could play around with MP as a dlc.

In my opinion MP could add depth to an already amazing game and without it being a distraction from the SP experience we all know and love i say go for it!:D

#2
Fragglespank

Fragglespank
  • Members
  • 332 messages
Sten: "No."

#3
KainrycKarr

KainrycKarr
  • Members
  • 4 819 messages
Or instead of a crappy MP DLC we could just wait until the inevitable spin-off ME game which would almost certainly have MP.  A spin-off dedicated to MP would be infinitely better for everyone involved, rather than forcing MP into a system not designed for it.

Why can't people just leave the trilogy alone?

Modifié par KainrycKarr, 14 juin 2011 - 01:15 .


#4
crimzontearz

crimzontearz
  • Members
  • 16 789 messages
no

no

HELL no

#5
mikejcroc

mikejcroc
  • Members
  • 29 messages


#6
Lunatic LK47

Lunatic LK47
  • Members
  • 2 024 messages

crimzontearz wrote...

no

no

HELL no


This. If this is forced in, I'll guarantee a riot bigger than the Rodney King Scandal in 1992.

#7
SilentNukee

SilentNukee
  • Members
  • 1 665 messages
*Waits for Javier to lock the thread.* :P
Honestly though, have you not played AC: Brotherhood or UC2/3? (Well, probably not 3 yet :P) It was nice little added bonus.

#8
Someone With Mass

Someone With Mass
  • Members
  • 38 560 messages
Image IPB

#9
Vez04

Vez04
  • Members
  • 4 266 messages
Wish people seriously would just *Deal With It* when it comes to ME3 has no multiplayer, instead of making threads about it every week.

Modifié par Vez04, 14 juin 2011 - 01:34 .


#10
Images

Images
  • Members
  • 586 messages
My response to the OP?

Image IPB


Heh, just kidding! Though I do disagree. :)

Modifié par Images, 14 juin 2011 - 01:32 .


#11
SilentNukee

SilentNukee
  • Members
  • 1 665 messages

Images wrote...

My response to MP in ME3?

Image IPB


YESSS!! Game of Thrones!!! Last night's episode made me want to punch my TV...I mean, WTF!?

#12
thatguy212

thatguy212
  • Members
  • 1 747 messages
Honestly the only problem with multiplayer is how would power usage work?

#13
ScepticMatt

ScepticMatt
  • Members
  • 484 messages
Hmm ... how about no? I'd rather have more SP content.

*waits for the Javier*

#14
Casper DM

Casper DM
  • Members
  • 69 messages
I am not against a Mass Effect multiplayer or MMO for that matter but ME3 should stay true to being a solo campaign.

The real question for me is how could you make a Mass Effect multiplayer work, I know I found Star Wars Battlefront to be a lot of fun and would definitely considering getting a Mass Effect version of it should one be released.

#15
Ninjapino

Ninjapino
  • Members
  • 442 messages

KainrycKarr wrote...

Or instead of a crappy MP DLC we could just wait until the inevitable spin-off ME game which would almost certainly have MP.  A spin-off dedicated to MP would be infinitely better for everyone involved, rather than forcing MP into a system not designed for it.

Why can't people just leave the trilogy alone?


^this

I don't think they'd put it in if it wasn't at least decent, I trust Bioware that much, but it'd be much better if it was it's own separate entity altogether.  Honestly, though, I don't think we really have to worry about it being in ME3, I can't see it actually happening.

#16
ezrafetch

ezrafetch
  • Members
  • 535 messages
I think a multiplayer in the style of RDR would be pretty cool especially with the way factions/species have been fleshed out lore-wise.

Sign on, pick a species/alliance, pick a role, go kill other species/alliances in hilarious missions and/or raids. Or you can start inter-species clans/merc groups with friends and go raid or kill people. It'd be pretty sweet. You can change whenever you want, whatever.

Krogans would be combat-focused, Soldier/Vanguard loadouts
Asari would have biotic-focused Sentinel/Adept loadouts
Salarians would have tech-focused Engineer/Infiltrator loadouts
Turians would have combat-focused Infiltrator/Soldier loadouts
Humans can have any loadout but will inherently have less "power" than other races (trade efficiency for flexibility)

It'd pretty much have to be a stand-alone DLC or full game though (I can see full game to maximize the cash involved), mostly because there's absolutely no way something that epic would be fleshed out by launch.

Modifié par ezrafetch, 14 juin 2011 - 01:56 .


#17
ShepardVI

ShepardVI
  • Members
  • 15 messages
No,No way in hell should they put a MP component on ME3... the Mass effect series should stay a singleplayer series, As it doesn't Need MP. its doing perfectly fine,every game don't need MP..

#18
CrimsonNephilim

CrimsonNephilim
  • Members
  • 1 648 messages
The only reason I don't see MP/Co-op not working in Mass Effect is

Decisions- The way the conversations work in Mass Effect, Shepard is given options of what choices to make and based on those choices, form how the game plays out. Since the dialogue is directed at Shepard to make the decisions, kind of hard to see how MP/Co-op could work around this. Plus, when on the Normandy what would the co-op player do in the mean time while Shepard is making rounds on the ship to speak to the crew?

Also, BW already stated the MP/Co-op was a no go for the trilogy based on the fact that it would drive the game in the direction of becoming a Shooter, when it is suppose to be an RPG. A Lot of fans got upset with ME2 because the changes to it took away from the RPG aspect. For ME3, they are re-focusing on bringing the RPG aspect back into the game.

Modifié par CrimsonNephilim, 14 juin 2011 - 01:49 .


#19
Ninjapino

Ninjapino
  • Members
  • 442 messages
I like your idea, @ezrafetch. I'd think having it be different merc groups would be fun, an easy way to separate them (classes, races, uniforms, etc), and an easy way to give it a background (different merc groups fighting each other.....not too complicated).

#20
Onilink1230

Onilink1230
  • Members
  • 31 messages
uh be cause i know now that 6 months after me3's release that im gonna get bored an i want to play mass effect its a great game

and as far as powers i dont have the full thought out but with the exception of maybe adrenalin burst all the powers should work fine in mp

listen i dont want to force a louse mp but it think bw can pull it off and as i said before i think it could add some depth to the ip as a whole

#21
REgentleman

REgentleman
  • Members
  • 81 messages
Agreed on the powers thing, thatguy. While the powers would be what would set ME multiplayer aside from other hump it/plop it cover shooters, I can't imagine having a lot of fun getting put in a Heavy Singularity loop until the other guy summons the mercy to finish off my ragdoll, as much fun as that is in the main game. Would powers be flying back and forth all the time, or would they be in more of the brief power-up niche? Assuming the multiplayer is relatable at all to standard single-player ME3 gameplay. (all hypothetical, of course)

How much would there be fighting-game style ways to tech or soften the impact of powers, if any? How balanced would gun-based styles, melee-based styles, anything not power-based be compared to Engineers and Adepts? (No preference myself, but anyway) And how would the inevitable (really freakin loud) argument between the people who enjoy playing ME for the RPG elements, versus the RTS elements, versus the shooter elements be mediated by the developers?

Of course, I'd be making the assumption there that powers are involved much at all, and that we're not something like red-shirt grunts from certain factions or something more on that line. Hmm.. cerberus vs alliance maps.. geth vs quarians setups.. my head spins with the possibilities.

I'd hate to be the guy who has to decide whether to keep all assets focused on the single-player, or try to divert some to put together a fun multiplayer bit, however short-lived it might be.

edit: Beat to the punch by Ezrafeth, exactly. the kind of thing I had in mind.

Modifié par REgentleman, 14 juin 2011 - 01:59 .


#22
Onilink1230

Onilink1230
  • Members
  • 31 messages
iv always wondered how my Shepard and his companions would fair against someone else's am i the only one?

#23
KingNothing125

KingNothing125
  • Members
  • 2 291 messages

Someone With Mass wrote...

Image IPB


This.

#24
StowyMcStowstow

StowyMcStowstow
  • Members
  • 648 messages
Well, to put it lightly: NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.

I do not understand why people want multiplayer in a very decidedly single-player game. It has no purpose, adds nothing to the game, and wold only serve to ****** me off. It is an expensive recipe for distaster that would not end well for anyone.

And stop making threads about it. Seriously. Just stop.

#25
onelifecrisis

onelifecrisis
  • Members
  • 2 829 messages
No.