101 réponses à ce sujet

[SilentNukee]

StowyMcStowstow wrote...

Well, to put it lightly: NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.

I do not understand why people want multiplayer in a very decidedly single-player game. It has no purpose, adds nothing to the game, and wold only serve to ****** me off. It is an expensive recipe for distaster that would not end well for anyone.

And stop making threads about it. Seriously. Just stop.

Have you played AC: Brotherhood or Uncharted 2?

[Onilink1230]

just expressing my freedom of speech in favor of what i think could be the greatest mp experience since the creation of the word

[The Spamming Troll]

everyone would be a vanguard.

[Graunt]

The only multiplayer this game should ever consider (and then only if it's somewhat easy to incorporate) is 2-3 player co-op, since the squad AI has always been pretty awful in these games.  Otherwise, no thanks.

SilentNukee wrote...

StowyMcStowstow wrote...

Well,
to put it lightly:
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.

I
do not understand why people want multiplayer in a very decidedly
single-player game. It has no purpose, adds nothing to the game, and
wold only serve to ****** me off. It is an expensive recipe for distaster
that would not end well for anyone.

And stop making threads about it. Seriously. Just stop.

Have you played AC: Brotherhood or Uncharted 2?
[smilie]../../../images/forum/emoticons/whistling.png[/smilie]

And the multiplayer in those games added what exactly to the single player portion of the game?  Yeah, nothing.  The multiplayer itself wasn't really that great either, but at least it didn't actually take away from the single player that much.

Modifié par Graunt, 14 juin 2011 - 02:18 .

[SilentNukee]

Graunt wrote...

The only multiplayer this game should ever consider (and then only if it's somewhat easy to incorporate) is 2-3 player co-op, since the squad AI has always been pretty awful in these games.  Otherwise, no thanks.

SilentNukee wrote...

StowyMcStowstow wrote...

Well,
to put it lightly:
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.

I
do not understand why people want multiplayer in a very decidedly
single-player game. It has no purpose, adds nothing to the game, and
wold only serve to ****** me off. It is an expensive recipe for distaster
that would not end well for anyone.

And stop making threads about it. Seriously. Just stop.

Have you played AC: Brotherhood or Uncharted 2?
[smilie]../../../images/forum/emoticons/whistling.png[/smilie]

And the multiplayer in those games added what exactly to the single player portion of the game?  Yeah, nothing.  The multiplayer itself wasn't really that great either, but at least it didn't actually take away from the single player that much.

It didn't take away from the single player experience AT ALL. Which is why it's a great thing, because it acted as an added little bonus that you can do once you're done the main story and/or are just bored and trying to kill time.

I'm personally not looking forward to ME strickly MP games if that's what they have in mind for the future. At least, I find the transition from the ME trilogy to that would be awkward at first. Wouldn't stop me from buying it, though.

Modifié par SilentNukee, 14 juin 2011 - 02:25 .

[Onilink1230]

i just want to incinerate some guy from [insert location here] thats all

[Skilled Seeker]

ezrafetch wrote...

I think a multiplayer in the style of RDR would be pretty cool especially with the way factions/species have been fleshed out lore-wise.

Sign on, pick a species/alliance, pick a role, go kill other species/alliances in hilarious missions and/or raids. Or you can start inter-species clans/merc groups with friends and go raid or kill people. It'd be pretty sweet. You can change whenever you want, whatever.

Krogans would be combat-focused, Soldier/Vanguard loadouts
Asari would have biotic-focused Sentinel/Adept loadouts
Salarians would have tech-focused Engineer/Infiltrator loadouts
Turians would have combat-focused Infiltrator/Soldier loadouts
Humans can have any loadout but will inherently have less "power" than other races (trade efficiency for flexibility)

It'd pretty much have to be a stand-alone DLC or full game though (I can see full game to maximize the cash involved), mostly because there's absolutely no way something that epic would be fleshed out by launch.

Biotics is rare amongst krogan, very rare. It makes no sense for vanguard to be their speciality.

Modifié par Skilled Seeker, 14 juin 2011 - 02:33 .

[Zebron is reaL]

www.youtube.com/watch

[Anihilus]

Picard: NO! NOOOO!!!

[MysticMage44]

Modifié par MysticMage44, 14 juin 2011 - 02:41 .

[Noob451]

Fragglespank wrote...

Sten: "No."

[ezrafetch]

Skilled Seeker wrote...
Biotics is rare amongst krogan, very rare. It makes no sense for vanguard to be their speciality.

Not really aware of the entirety of the lore. Even given a lack of common biotics, there'd have to be some sort of balance in terms of gameplay.  Seemed to make the most sense.  You can balance by either giving every Krogan player weak biotics or randomly generate Battlemasters with biotic capabilities.  I wouldn't want to see Krogans become Immunity spammers...

I also thought up the entire MP experience in <2 minutes, so there's going to be some major issues...especially since I literally almost forgot about the turians

You could also include Geth, even, but I'm not sure how that would work, there'd probably be way too much overlap given their skillset.

Modifié par ezrafetch, 14 juin 2011 - 02:48 .

[Dark Star]

BioWare already confirmed in an interview with GameInformer that there will be no multiplayer in ME3.





This is a very good thing.

[ladyvader]

StowyMcStowstow wrote...

Well, to put it lightly: NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.

I do not understand why people want multiplayer in a very decidedly single-player game. It has no purpose, adds nothing to the game, and wold only serve to ****** me off. It is an expensive recipe for distaster that would not end well for anyone.

And stop making threads about it. Seriously. Just stop.

Mass Effect is the best single player game this generation of games.  Why ruin it with a gimick like MP?   The co-op in both Fable II and III were awful.  Worked at times, but was more of headache.  All of this just to make you collect crap with others via MP just ruined the Fable franchise in my view.  

Hell to the nth degree NO!

I don't play many MP games, because the story usually blows and they tend to put too much focus on the MP.  Again.

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!

EDIT: Now if BioWare wants to make another Mass Effect and make that MP, I would actually be ok with it, but not anything that deals with Commander Shepard's trilogy.

Modifié par ladyvader, 14 juin 2011 - 02:51 .

[Onilink1230]

and they also said that they are scaning the forums so if if most people had wanted mp they would do it

[Kileyan]

I would love a later spinoff game that was 100 percent done for multiplayer shooter. I really do like the Mass Effect fiction.

I would hate a half arsed addition or DLC that did mplay badly and neutered all the characters skills for single play at the same time, in order to make them work for mplay.

[Kaiser Shepard]

Stroke of genius, as long as it's done in a Horde/Firefight kind of way. Holding the line against wave upon wave of AI baddies, working together with three (or less) people you actually met on here.

Wouldn't be that difficult to create, nor would it consume a lot of time or resources. Some of the tasks (or the majority of them) could even be outsourced to one of EA's other studios, such as DICE.

Modifié par Kaiser Shepard, 14 juin 2011 - 03:04 .

[SennenScale]

Terrible, terrible idea.

[Hathur]

This argument is 100% completely pointless, Casey Hudson said long ago there will be no multiplayer in ME3... what's the point in discussing a feature that isn't going to happen?

Just let this dead horse die already, its rotted, fetid corpse has been flogged enough.

[Zelelous]

 i think it could work, i heard people dont like the idea of a buncha shepard runnin around so why not play as different mercenary groups or task forces such as

• blue suns , eclipse , bloodpack vorcha , alliance military , cerberus agents ,
• standard gametypes like tdm, domination, etc. and maybe some creative ones
• the use of vehicles like ships fork lifts and heavy mechs

[Icinix]

Why does it have to be one or the other?

Why can't it be a gameplay element that some people may wish to take advantage of and others will skip over in the menu options?

[Skilled Seeker]

Horde mode DLC will happen. I'm calling it here and now!

[shnizzler93]

Not going to happen

[Kileyan]

Icinix wrote...

Why does it have to be one or the other?

Why can't it be a gameplay element that some people may wish to take advantage of and others will skip over in the menu options?

Because it really is a one or the other thing.

Multiplayer takes away from time in crafting a single player story. It would change everything. It isn't as easy as just letting your buddy take over as one of your npcs. It would be two Sheps trying to play a story and share story choices................or it would be an entire game within the game that is ONLY co-op mplay story.

Those things really do matter and take time, and will take time and resources away from crafting a proper awesome ending to this trilogy.

[Lunatic LK47]

Kileyan wrote...

Icinix wrote...

Why does it have to be one or the other?

Why can't it be a gameplay element that some people may wish to take advantage of and others will skip over in the menu options?

Because it really is a one or the other thing.

Multiplayer takes away from time in crafting a single player story. It would change everything. It isn't as easy as just letting your buddy take over as one of your npcs. It would be two Sheps trying to play a story and share story choices................or it would be an entire game within the game that is ONLY co-op mplay story.

Those things really do matter and take time, and will take time and resources away from crafting a proper awesome ending to this trilogy.

This. Every game that suddenly dropped in multiplayer "just because" ended up half-assing single-player.

Resident Evil 5: Co-op is MANDATORY for harder difficulties (i.e. Partner A.I. is that useless.)

Halo 3: Flood Infantry eraticcaly turn invincible DUE TO A GLITCH for campaign just because of the extensive focus on multiplayer, X-Box Live, and 4-player Co-op.

Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood: Whatever hard-core fans I know of were disappointed with the campaign.