The ME universe over the span of just 2 games had many instances involving interactions that were huge as well as minute. Are there any issues you want to see resolved completely or do you think you've forgotten about a majority of them? The big ones are always simple to recall. Like the Rachni queen. What about the smaller ones?
I can't expect to see all loose ends tied, though it would be exceptional if they were. Many have forgotten what others may remember.
As players of the game, what areas do you want to see closure in?
Closure.....
Débuté par
shadowreflexion
, juin 14 2011 04:40
Retour en haut
#2
Posté 14 juin 2011 - 04:43
Alamar2078
-
- Members
- 2 618 messages
Actually a solid sense of "closure" is the BIG thing that I want from ME3. I want this to feel like it is a proper end of the trilogy while [devil's advocate] leaving B/W enough room to play in the ME universe if they'd like.
#3
Posté 14 juin 2011 - 04:43
marshalleck
-
- Members
- 15 645 messages
All major character arcs. Little details, such as Armistan Banes for example would be amazing, but I'm not expecting anything there.
#4
Guest_Gnas_*
Posté 14 juin 2011 - 04:47
Guest_Gnas_*
Guest_Gnas_*
-
- Guests
Balak. That Batarian needs to die and my Shepard is more than willing to pull the trigger.
#5
Posté 14 juin 2011 - 04:50
marshalleck
-
- Members
- 15 645 messages
Sure, as long as it comes with a cost. Letting that psychopath go in the first place is absurdly reckless. You already had your chance to put a bullet in him.Gnas wrote...
Balak. That Batarian needs to die and my Shepard is more than willing to pull the trigger.
Modifié par marshalleck, 14 juin 2011 - 04:51 .
#6
Posté 14 juin 2011 - 05:19
shadowreflexion
-
- Members
- 634 messages
marshalleck wrote...
Sure, as long as it comes with a cost. Letting that psychopath go in the first place is absurdly reckless. You already had your chance to put a bullet in him.Gnas wrote...
Balak. That Batarian needs to die and my Shepard is more than willing to pull the trigger.
I agree with both points but what could possibly be the cost? 300,000 are already dead unless they say we did it out of spite stemming from BDtS. So you think that having closure should include consequences?
#7
Posté 14 juin 2011 - 05:22
Arcite550
-
- Members
- 311 messages
What about the brother and sister in the first ME fighting over the child thing. 
I wonder what happened there
I wonder what happened there
#8
Posté 14 juin 2011 - 05:34
marshalleck
-
- Members
- 15 645 messages
What are you talking about? Balak has nothing to do with Arrival.shadowreflexion wrote...
marshalleck wrote...
Sure, as long as it comes with a cost. Letting that psychopath go in the first place is absurdly reckless. You already had your chance to put a bullet in him.Gnas wrote...
Balak. That Batarian needs to die and my Shepard is more than willing to pull the trigger.
I agree with both points but what could possibly be the cost? 300,000 are already dead unless they say we did it out of spite stemming from BDtS. So you think that having closure should include consequences?
#9
Posté 14 juin 2011 - 05:36
marshalleck
-
- Members
- 15 645 messages
Arcite550 wrote...
What about the brother and sister in the first ME fighting over the child thing.
You can see them on the Citadel in ME2 actually, once again debating which augments to purchase from one of the vendors on the lower level.
#10
Posté 14 juin 2011 - 05:53
shadowreflexion
-
- Members
- 634 messages
You didn't get what I meant. What I meant is the Batarians saying that with those events that resulted in those deaths, could be interpreted by them as an act of revenge. Not at all saying that the two events are related. Just saying that at a trial they could try to use that as the reason. Like saying, Balak got away and Shep was looking for any reason to get payback against our race so he destroyed our star system. Though that had nothing to do with it.marshalleck wrote...
What are you talking about? Balak has nothing to do with Arrival.shadowreflexion wrote...
marshalleck wrote...
Sure, as long as it comes with a cost. Letting that psychopath go in the first place is absurdly reckless. You already had your chance to put a bullet in him.Gnas wrote...
Balak. That Batarian needs to die and my Shepard is more than willing to pull the trigger.
I agree with both points but what could possibly be the cost? 300,000 are already dead unless they say we did it out of spite stemming from BDtS. So you think that having closure should include consequences?
#11
Posté 14 juin 2011 - 06:14
United_Strafes
-
- Members
- 1 098 messages
If I get to see Banes I'll be satisfied, you know he's still alive.
#12
Posté 14 juin 2011 - 09:08
onelifecrisis
-
- Members
- 2 829 messages
As I posted in the ME3 concerns thread, I want to see the Reapers defeated and Shepard's story closed. No TBC crap please, Bioware. I will not fund a never-ending story. I'd even accept Reaper victory if that's all that's on offer. Just some kind of proper ending.
Modifié par onelifecrisis, 14 juin 2011 - 09:09 .
