Aller au contenu

Photo

Did the developers want us to side with the templars in DA2?


1008 réponses à ce sujet

#826
Wulfram

Wulfram
  • Members
  • 18 948 messages

IanPolaris wrote...

She HAD to be a bloodmage and her codex entry even says she was a Tevinter mage that studied bloodmagic (which makes her a bloodmage!)  Unless you use bloodmagic mindcontrol, there is simply no way to develope and test the Litany of Adralla to begin with!

-Polaris


Said Codex says she did not practice blood magic, which makes her not a blood mage.  Plus, Wynne gives a different account, and I'd generally believe stuff Bioware went to the bother of VOing over stuff in the codex.

#827
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages

Wulfram wrote...

IanPolaris wrote...

She HAD to be a bloodmage and her codex entry even says she was a Tevinter mage that studied bloodmagic (which makes her a bloodmage!)  Unless you use bloodmagic mindcontrol, there is simply no way to develope and test the Litany of Adralla to begin with!

-Polaris


Said Codex says she did not practice blood magic, which makes her not a blood mage.  Plus, Wynne gives a different account, and I'd generally believe stuff Bioware went to the bother of VOing over stuff in the codex.


Actually that's not quite what the Codex says.  The Codex says that Adralla studed the theoretical aspects rather than the practical ones, but it doesn't quite say she wasn't a bloodmage (although you, the reader, are supposed to leap to that conclusion).  Why was the codex witten in this confusing way?

Easy:  Read who wrote it.  The codex entry was written by the chantry, and they can't admit that Adralla had to be a bloodmage without making themselves look like the hypocrits they are.  Also a modicum of common sense should convince you that Adralla had to be a bloodmage.  If she wasn't able to cast mind-control magic to test the Litany, there is no way she could have tested it, and thus no way she could have perfected it.

As for Wynne, that old bat is wrong far more often than she is right, and she comes from a PoV that despises all bloodmagic no matter what.  I wouldn't be at all suprised if "Adralla was a bard" is the modern Chantry line (for the idiots in the Pews).

-Polaris

#828
Torax

Torax
  • Members
  • 1 829 messages
why is Wynne wrong? Because she isn't an lib like Uldred and thinks the Chantry is right in some aspects and wrong in others. She doesn't follow the Chantry to the letter. She is far more neutral in that aspect but she draws the line at some things including demons, blood magic and general evil stuff. Wynne is basically the Dragon Age version of Jolee Bindo. If you don't like her because she doesn't support the likes of Anders? Fine but don't then try to act like everything she states in invalid just because it's at times opposed to your own views or opinions.

The irony that I would even have to type that is the fact that because she was written by the writers and was voiced by an actor. She will ALWAYS be more right than you in regards to the context of the World she exists within. Her opinion will be more valid than your's which is based on your own preconceptions that have NOTHING to do with the her World and how it has shaped her. You can try and dance the issue of the Writers and their opinions but it's just a dance and avoids the fact that Wynne is right to her beliefs and you are wrong to attempt to invalidate it if it doesn't support your case. She lives there and even witnessed Uldred's deprave actions with blood magic. You did not. You sat at your computer playing the facade of defending the innocent mages. Wynne has done this longer than likely your entire life span.

Your opinion is just your own and not a state of fact. A codex is an opinion yes it is like Wynne's is just an opinion. But you attempting to invalidate one over the other? No, you do not get to. I'd also take the opinion of an experienced Senior Enchanter over the whiney angsty ****** that I knife every time at the end of each DA2 game. The irony of all this, Wynne is a reasonable person. Anders more like some of the posters here are not reasonable. They only want to argue/fight the issues of Templar vs. Mage while making one side evil and the other not. Wynne seemed more on the side of most of the senior enchanters. They see that the Chantry is wrong in some ways but so are many in the circle. Libs refuse to reason. Just like anyone now who would only make villains of the Chantry cause they are opposed to Blood Magic with many good reasons to do so.

I've openly said that I think Blood Magic is just a tool that can be used for good or evil. The catch 22 of it is that I would at the same time openly admit that I think the cons of blood magic far outweigh the pros. But I guess that makes me a bad guy for thinking mages should avoid it at all costs. While I also stay clear of the chantry when I can for the same reason. Cons outweigh the pros on both sides to me. Guess there is a little Jolee in me to.

#829
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages
Wynne is frequently factually wrong which is why I give her less weight than the codecies (see Grey Warden Mages). Really that should be enough.

-Polaris

#830
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages
[dp]

#831
MichaelFinnegan

MichaelFinnegan
  • Members
  • 1 032 messages

EmperorSahlertz wrote...

As I recall it was adressed on the foums that a dwarf who has been on the surface for long enough will start dreaming. Instead of "sleeping like the stone". Could be that it was simply a theory put forward, the discussion was quite a long time ago.

My point isn't that, though. It is that there are no dwarf mages in existence today (ignoring Sandal's abilities for a moment). Also, DA2 seems to suggest that dwarves could once do magic, which could mean they somehow have lost that ability a long time ago, willingly or otherwise. And we know that dwarves don't go to the Fade when they dream, so these two might be related.

The issue with mages who fear the harrowing and being possessed comes directly from the fact that they are mages, in that they attract demons. They'd have less to fear if that connection to the Fade could be removed, in the same manner as the dwarves, not in the manner of the tranquil.

#832
Torax

Torax
  • Members
  • 1 829 messages

IanPolaris wrote...

Wynne is frequently factually wrong which is why I give her less weight than the codecies (see Grey Warden Mages). Really that should be enough.

-Polaris


No see you using a codex to attempt to outweigh a character in a world is basically almost near what you accuse her of having less weight for. See you use codexs which are opinions of other characters from one point of view to attempt to outweigh a person who lives within said Circle. That is the equal to taking passages out of context from the Bible to support to some case of morality when if the entire passage of the Bible was read it could actually work against the cause. Wynne dislikes Blood Magic cause of the negatives it leads to. More likely to be in the way of demons. Even Anders hates demons. Wynne respects Andraste but doesn't appear to consider herself a devoted member of the Chantry. She does what she feels is right. You would use a Codex to invalidate her while at the same time pointing out in another case that a codex was written by the Chantry to suit their needs. You can't have both. I'd still take Wynne's word over a member of the Chantry. I'd take someone who does things for the right the reasons not just because of a letter of the law.

#833
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages

Torax wrote...

IanPolaris wrote...

Wynne is frequently factually wrong which is why I give her less weight than the codecies (see Grey Warden Mages). Really that should be enough.

-Polaris


No see you using a codex to attempt to outweigh a character in a world is basically almost near what you accuse her of having less weight for. See you use codexs which are opinions of other characters from one point of view to attempt to outweigh a person who lives within said Circle. That is the equal to taking passages out of context from the Bible to support to some case of morality when if the entire passage of the Bible was read it could actually work against the cause. Wynne dislikes Blood Magic cause of the negatives it leads to. More likely to be in the way of demons. Even Anders hates demons. Wynne respects Andraste but doesn't appear to consider herself a devoted member of the Chantry. She does what she feels is right. You would use a Codex to invalidate her while at the same time pointing out in another case that a codex was written by the Chantry to suit their needs. You can't have both. I'd still take Wynne's word over a member of the Chantry. I'd take someone who does things for the right the reasons not just because of a letter of the law.


Yes and this is justified.  The Codecies represent the Lore of the Game as it is interpreted and understood by the authors of the Codex.  While that might mean a Codex is factually incorrect, it DOES mean the information is correct and factual (like an encyclopedia entry) according to the people that wrote it.  Furthermore, presumably, like encyclopedia articles, Codex entries reflect works of scholarship with research, fact-checking, etc.  What Wynne gives is her own unsubstantianted opinion of who she thinks Adralla is (which doesn't even make casual sense since she says Adralla is a "Bard" but all bards in Thedas are Rogues and then identifies the Litany as a spell).

The Codex entry is self-referentially consistant within the context of who wrote it (unlike most of what Wynne has to say).

Ergo, I give more weight to the Codex.

-Polaris

#834
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 987 messages
I have to agree with Ian about Adralla. There's no way she could've known her counter measures were so effective without practicing blood magic if she was the only one studying them.


If she had a few mage friends willing to help out, then sure there's a chance she wasn't a blood mage. But since that doesn't seem to be the case because the Tevinters were unhappy with what she was doing, she had to be a practicing blood mage.

#835
Torax

Torax
  • Members
  • 1 829 messages

IanPolaris wrote...

Torax wrote...

IanPolaris wrote...

Wynne is frequently factually wrong which is why I give her less weight than the codecies (see Grey Warden Mages). Really that should be enough.

-Polaris


No see you using a codex to attempt to outweigh a character in a world is basically almost near what you accuse her of having less weight for. See you use codexs which are opinions of other characters from one point of view to attempt to outweigh a person who lives within said Circle. That is the equal to taking passages out of context from the Bible to support to some case of morality when if the entire passage of the Bible was read it could actually work against the cause. Wynne dislikes Blood Magic cause of the negatives it leads to. More likely to be in the way of demons. Even Anders hates demons. Wynne respects Andraste but doesn't appear to consider herself a devoted member of the Chantry. She does what she feels is right. You would use a Codex to invalidate her while at the same time pointing out in another case that a codex was written by the Chantry to suit their needs. You can't have both. I'd still take Wynne's word over a member of the Chantry. I'd take someone who does things for the right the reasons not just because of a letter of the law.


Yes and this is justified.  The Codecies represent the Lore of the Game as it is interpreted and understood by the authors of the Codex.  While that might mean a Codex is factually incorrect, it DOES mean the information is correct and factual (like an encyclopedia entry) according to the people that wrote it.  Furthermore, presumably, like encyclopedia articles, Codex entries reflect works of scholarship with research, fact-checking, etc.  What Wynne gives is her own unsubstantianted opinion of who she thinks Adralla is (which doesn't even make casual sense since she says Adralla is a "Bard" but all bards in Thedas are Rogues and then identifies the Litany as a spell).

The Codex entry is self-referentially consistant within the context of who wrote it (unlike most of what Wynne has to say).

Ergo, I give more weight to the Codex.

-Polaris


You are only supporting a codex if it supports your case. I would still take a the opinion of a reasonable member of the Senior Enchanters over most the mages you admire. I'd also take her opinion over most of the members of the Chantry you'd ever run across and many of the codex entries that just attempt to call things like Blood Magic a sin. Why would you invalidate her anyway? Or does her hatred of Blood Magic and her belief the Circle helps mages that exist with in it just opposes your anger towards the Chantry and their Templars?

#836
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages
No I'm not. I discount Wynne testimony unless I have no other option because she is so frequently wrong. I almost always use the Codex entries as my "go to" source for game lore with the UNDERSTANDING that these Codex entries are written with a specific PoV that has to be accounted for.

-Polaris

#837
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 987 messages
Torax, Wynne has been living in a Chantry controlled area for her whole life since she was taken there. The Chantry has been mired in hypocrisy for a long time, so much so that they use blood magic (phylacteries) to track down a mage.


Wynne herself acknowledges that the Circles are a prison, but they are necessary. Her condemnation of blood magic is no doubt due to her Chantry dogma brainwashing. It should be obvious to anyone in Thedas --- mages especially so --- that blood magic could be used medicinally since it can control the flow of blood.

#838
Torax

Torax
  • Members
  • 1 829 messages

IanPolaris wrote...

No I'm not. I discount Wynne testimony unless I have no other option because she is so frequently wrong. I almost always use the Codex entries as my "go to" source for game lore with the UNDERSTANDING that these Codex entries are written with a specific PoV that has to be accounted for.

-Polaris


I could argue some are just a parable or a story at best. For example all the traveling tales and opinions of the Scholar. Those are hardly factual that they are just his opinion of how he sees a culture. This is same for all Codexs. So this is why I accuse of you of using them as a fact if they support your case and discrediting them if they do not. They are opinions and some of them are so old they were opinions of Thedas forged long before Wynne was even born. Many of them were based in the Chantry before it evolved to their current state. So it's like a reference to an encyclopedia from 1705 versus one from 2005. The World view alone would be completely different. So you don't get to shield yourself via just a text format versus someone living in a present day Circle. That would actually more help to validate Wynne than invalidate her.

#839
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages

Torax wrote...

IanPolaris wrote...

No I'm not. I discount Wynne testimony unless I have no other option because she is so frequently wrong. I almost always use the Codex entries as my "go to" source for game lore with the UNDERSTANDING that these Codex entries are written with a specific PoV that has to be accounted for.

-Polaris


I could argue some are just a parable or a story at best. For example all the traveling tales and opinions of the Scholar. Those are hardly factual that they are just his opinion of how he sees a culture. This is same for all Codexs. So this is why I accuse of you of using them as a fact if they support your case and discrediting them if they do not. They are opinions and some of them are so old they were opinions of Thedas forged long before Wynne was even born. Many of them were based in the Chantry before it evolved to their current state. So it's like a reference to an encyclopedia from 1705 versus one from 2005. The World view alone would be completely different. So you don't get to shield yourself via just a text format versus someone living in a present day Circle. That would actually more help to validate Wynne than invalidate her.


This is why I am upset with you.  You level a rather serious accusation at me and do nothing to back this up.  In fact your accusation is wrong.  I have always viewed Codex Entries as a "greater" source of information than in-character dialog unless the character speaking has specific and very explicit reasons to know better (such as actually BEING a templar rather than writing about it).,  The fact is that Wynne is frequently wrong about what she thinks she knows.  That's no suprise considering her background and her age.  This does NOT mean I view codex entries as absolute facts.  Rather they are the best information available written from the explicit (and often slanted) Point of View of the Author.

-Polaris

#840
EmperorSahlertz

EmperorSahlertz
  • Members
  • 8 809 messages
Again: we are talking about MAGIC, there are infinite possibilities for Adralla to be able to study her countermeasures without being a blood mage herself. It is MAGIC. Hence the common phrase: a MAGE did it.

On a side note: in which cases was Wynne wrong about? I disagreed with her on some points, but I don't remember her being explicitly wrong.

Modifié par EmperorSahlertz, 24 juin 2011 - 07:06 .


#841
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages

EmperorSahlertz wrote...

Again: we are talking about MAGIC, there are infinite possibilities for Adralla to be able to study her countermeasures without being a blood mage herself. It is MAGIC. Hence the common phrase: a MAGE did it.


In Dragon Age, Magic follows certain rules and has laws that can be discovered and followed.  Basically magic in Thedas is pretty much what science (or more accurately technology) is to this one.  As such, how is Adralla going to discover if her litany works?  She has to TEST IT!  How does she test this?  She has to be a bloodmage.  No getting around it.  Saying, "But it's magic" when magic is defined, is intellectually lazy and frankly dishonest.

On a side note: in which cases was Wynne wrong about? I disagreed with her on some points, but I don't remember her being explicitly wrong.


She is wrong about pretty much everything she claims as fact about Grey Wardens including the number of Grey Warden mages.

-Polaris

#842
EmperorSahlertz

EmperorSahlertz
  • Members
  • 8 809 messages
She could also have tested it by being given permit to follow Templars who were hunting a known blood mage.. The possibilities are infinite.

So Wynne is wrong about a secretive organization, and that devaluates all her other opionions? That's... I don't even... Really?

#843
Torax

Torax
  • Members
  • 1 829 messages

EmperorSahlertz wrote...

She could also have tested it by being given permit to follow Templars who were hunting a known blood mage.. The possibilities are infinite.

So Wynne is wrong about a secretive organization, and that devaluates all her other opionions? That's... I don't even... Really?


This is why I tend to be in conflict with him. This self vindication that blinds him to all other points of views. He'll keep this path no matter what. He finds some opening and goes with it for years. So yes if she is wrong by giving the player a story about gray wardens that is more just a parable about how they protect mankind? She will be wrong about anything else that is in conflict with his opinion of things like the Chantry, The Circles, The Templars and so on. Especially if any of it is against his constant argument that mages are oppressed and magic is repressed by the Chantry. Including things like Blood Magic...

#844
sphinxess

sphinxess
  • Members
  • 503 messages

IanPolaris wrote...

EmperorSahlertz wrote...

Again: we are talking about MAGIC, there are infinite possibilities for Adralla to be able to study her countermeasures without being a blood mage herself. It is MAGIC. Hence the common phrase: a MAGE did it.


In Dragon Age, Magic follows certain rules and has laws that can be discovered and followed.  Basically magic in Thedas is pretty much what science (or more accurately technology) is to this one.  As such, how is Adralla going to discover if her litany works?  She has to TEST IT!  How does she test this?  She has to be a bloodmage.  No getting around it.  Saying, "But it's magic" when magic is defined, is intellectually lazy and frankly dishonest.
-Polaris


In fantasy fiction you have to have certain rules established when you create a world. Pulling out changes to advance a story <as is often done in television series these days sadly> is hack writing - Bioware seems to be quite good at trying to stay within the framework they establish thats why claiming its magic and every rule can be broken simply doesn't fit.

Modifié par sphinxess, 24 juin 2011 - 07:25 .


#845
EmperorSahlertz

EmperorSahlertz
  • Members
  • 8 809 messages

Torax wrote...

EmperorSahlertz wrote...

She could also have tested it by being given permit to follow Templars who were hunting a known blood mage.. The possibilities are infinite.

So Wynne is wrong about a secretive organization, and that devaluates all her other opionions? That's... I don't even... Really?


This is why I tend to be in conflict with him. This self vindication that blinds him to all other points of views. He'll keep this path no matter what. He finds some opening and goes with it for years. So yes if she is wrong by giving the player a story about gray wardens that is more just a parable about how they protect mankind? She will be wrong about anything else that is in conflict with his opinion of things like the Chantry, The Circles, The Templars and so on. Especially if any of it is against his constant argument that mages are oppressed and magic is repressed by the Chantry. Including things like Blood Magic...

To be fair, I don't think I'm much better. I'm just in the opposite camp than Polaris, and we've been going at it for a while now.

#846
Sajuro

Sajuro
  • Members
  • 6 871 messages

IanPolaris wrote...

EmperorSahlertz wrote...

Again: we are talking about MAGIC, there are infinite possibilities for Adralla to be able to study her countermeasures without being a blood mage herself. It is MAGIC. Hence the common phrase: a MAGE did it.


In Dragon Age, Magic follows certain rules and has laws that can be discovered and followed.  Basically magic in Thedas is pretty much what science (or more accurately technology) is to this one.  As such, how is Adralla going to discover if her litany works?  She has to TEST IT!  How does she test this?  She has to be a bloodmage.  No getting around it.  Saying, "But it's magic" when magic is defined, is intellectually lazy and frankly dishonest.


-Polaris

Wouldn't it have been more valuable to test it against blood mages who were actively trying to control minds? The litany does not work if the spell was already cast and it also hurts Abominations, and I think it would be rather ineffecient if she had someone else use the litany while she was using blood magic and she couldn't use it while she was casting herself because both seem to require concentration.
Her testing it in combat would also make more sense since she did live in tevinter and blood mages were a lot more common  than in the rest of Thedas.
Besides, before finishing it, she could have studied the theory of blood magic and how it worked to mind control people before coming up with, in theory, something that could counteract the casting of blood magic bent on mind control.
Could Adralla have been a practicing blood mage, possibly, was the only way to test her litany was to use blood magic to mind control people, nope.

#847
Silfren

Silfren
  • Members
  • 4 748 messages

maxernst wrote...

Oh, certainly the mage hunters could be in control of the state.  And trained mages who have proven themselves may very well be okay in society--and that appears to be how the Circle in Ferelden operates.  All Wynne had to do to join the Warden was ask the First Enchanter for permission.  Presumably that was how the mage that was searching for rare herbs in DA:A was out there--she was obviously not an apostate.  But some some sort of external control is required, and I see no evidence that Anders was willing to accept that.  Being torn from one's family is inevitable if you happen to be born in small village (as most people probably are), because mages need to be trained to be safe.  Not to mention the fact that I don't see how non-mage parents would cope with a child with potentially lethal temper tantrums.

In the societies where mages are supposedly "free" cited by people, I have a strong suspicion that mages occupy a distinct social caste (shaman/seer/keeper etc).  Because of strong cultural tradtions, conditioning for their role since childhood, and quite probably a role that gives them a high social status and quality material life, the vast majority of mages in these societies are probably content with their role, and willing to put down those that aren't.  But social controls are far easier to exert in highly traditional societies than in a place like Kirkwall or even Ferelden, and you can't simply import social models derived from other societies in a piecemeal fashion.  I still say that in a more competitive society, like Kirkwall appears to be, free mages will always wind up on top, and a minority which is innately different from the rest of the population will ultimately treat the rest of the population brutally.  Slavery may be abhorrent according to the Andrastean religion, but the notion that slavery makes the Tevinter Imperium SO different that freeing the Circles from chantry oversight (which is still not free enough for Anders' taste) will perfectly fine elsewhere is misguided.  And what is slavery anyway?  According to what we heard in DA:O, the chevaliers in Orlais enjoy the right to rape their peasants.  I wouldn't be surprised if Orlesian serfs are legally bound to the land and effectively bought and sold with it.  How different is that from slavery, really?


If for you it is slavery that is the issue...well, locking the mages away in Circles as currently happens (or did before Anders triggered the war) IS slavery.  Slavery is exactly what it is, and frankly, the systemic removal of mages from society to lock them away in towers, and everything else that is part and parcel of the tradition, including discouraging them from having children and taking away any children that do happen...fits the definition of genocide.  Not talking about the Right of Annulment here, but the general treatment of mages.

#848
Silfren

Silfren
  • Members
  • 4 748 messages
[quote]Torax wrote...

One praying mage you run into in Origins hated her gift of magic. To a point the only peaceful resolution to her stress and melancholy is to point out that she could ask to be made tranquil. While characters like Anders or Jowan think that being made Tranquil is practically death? It's office she did not. Owain also wanted it done instead of risking a Harrowing and or death. Owain seemed to find it agreeable. Slavery or no is argued in a few aspects. There is no cookie cutter rule that even existed in the cases presented to us.

[quote]

The mage you refer to who hated her magic is Keili, and she makes it clear that she hates magic not because she's afraid of demons coming after her, but because she has internalized the belief that magic is a curse from the Maker and absolutely nothing else.  She believes that it is a punishment for sin, a sign of her inherent wickedness. 

There's precisely one thing that causes that kind of self-hatred in this situation: religious brainwashing.  Find a better example.

#849
Silfren

Silfren
  • Members
  • 4 748 messages

Torax wrote...

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

but did Kelli see her magic as a curse of her own volition or because she's been spoonfed that it is a curse? The Chantry preaches that magic is a curse


The demons will call to mages in their dreams. Some may not have the will or the wish to have to face it. Owain asked to be made Tranquil because he didn't want to face the harrowing or be plagued by demons. This is the same thing Kelli seemed to be feeling. You want to see her as a pressured to think it's a curse? By whom? I doubt Irving would ever say such a thing. Gregoir didn't seem to be the sort to call it a curse. The Chantry didn't seem to imply magic is a curse. Meredith did. But that is one person not all. The Chantry claims that the Magisters brought their sin to the seat of the maker and then became the first darkspawn. This can be implied as magic is sinful but that in no way means it's a curse. What you are doing is applying it from the view of a villain you dislike not the general feeling the games have shown.


Greagoir most certainly does call magic a curse.  He states it is also a gift, but he nevertheless considers it equally as much a curse, as the first few opening lines to the Mage Origin.  And the Chantry does very much teach that magic is a curse--it is this very belief that it uses to justify locking mages away.  It would be very difficult to justify the practice to the general populace without magic-as-curse  being the foundation of the culture surrounding it.  You can figure this much out from listening to Lily, who directly refers to mages as "those cursed with magic."  

#850
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages

Sajuro wrote...

[Wouldn't it have been more valuable to test it against blood mages who were actively trying to control minds? The litany does not work if the spell was already cast and it also hurts Abominations, and I think it would be rather ineffecient if she had someone else use the litany while she was using blood magic and she couldn't use it while she was casting herself because both seem to require concentration.


Who says she didn't try?  It might be beyond the capacity, or she might have run out of time, or it might even be that not even the Chantry knows the full extent of Adralla's work.

As for someone else using the Litany, that is the entire point of the exercise!  The Litany was and is supposed to be (and was designed to be) a non-bloodmage's defense against mind-control magic, so Adralla would almost be required to have someone other than herself test it.  Sorta the point in fact.

Her testing it in combat would also make more sense since she did live in tevinter and blood mages were a lot more common  than in the rest of Thedas.


She didn't finish her research in Tevinter.

Besides, before finishing it, she could have studied the theory of blood magic and how it worked to mind control people before coming up with, in theory, something that could counteract the casting of blood magic bent on mind control.


It would still have to be tested and the Chantry didn't have any bloodmages other than Adralla.

Could Adralla have been a practicing blood mage, possibly, was the only way to test her litany was to use blood magic to mind control people, nope.


Actually yes unless the Chantry was deliberately training and using other bloodmages to help Adralla and there is zero indication of that.  The whole POINT of the Litany was for a non-bloodmage to use it against a mind-control spell in progess and the only possible person that could know a mind control spell to use would be Adralla which ipso facto makes her a bloodmage.

-Polaris