Properly Spec'd Vanguard will be able to charge a lot.
A properly spec'ed Vanguard will be able to charge A LOT. And with his new power that synergizes with charge, the class is awesome.
Modifié par JamieCOTC, 03 septembre 2011 - 08:44 .
TheShogunOfHarlem wrote...
You guys haven't heard the news.100k wrote...
Bad King wrote...
Fata Morgana wrote...
100k wrote...
Seriously Lucas! Replacing the police mens guns with Walkie Talkies in ET?
Er, that was Steven Spielberg that had ET edited, not Lucas.
Oy, kids today.
Lucas has made much stranger edits to his films:
www.youtube.com/watch
God, somebody please punch that man in the head. Please.
I meant Lucas and Spielberg because they work so closely on films.
I honestly was a defender of George Lucas when the prequels came out. I honestly thought that generally the PT worked well. However there were some very critical flaws in Narrative focus, Dialogue and Actor/Director relations. 6 years after ROTS, Those issues I now see as huge fundamental flaws in the PT. What was the point of having Jar Jar? (no I'm not one of the Jar Jar Haters) Or General Greivous? Why not add more depth to Count Dooku instead of introducing Grievous. It was things like that made the Prequels into a huge narrative mess.
Mikeyzs94 wrote...
Awesome thread!!!very informative and easy to read
the only thing on my mind now is if kasumi will be back
100k wrote...
*snip*
What the hell is wrong with that man? Somebody should just walk up to him in public, and scream "STOP RAPING OUR CHILDHOODS!"
Seriously, what the hell has Lucas done since the last SW movie -- hell, since ROTJ? Just remade his trilogies over and over again with different special effects??? I can't get over how unquestionably dumb he is.
Modifié par JamieCOTC, 03 septembre 2011 - 10:22 .
ZenJestr wrote...
Mikeyzs94 wrote...
Awesome thread!!!very informative and easy to read
the only thing on my mind now is if kasumi will be back
it's heavily implied that both DLC characters are getting ME2 Wrex treatment...i.e. cameo only
Even though I am not in the "George Lucas destroyed my childhood" Since I think it is a selfish, arrogant way to view the Star Wars films. I do however think that as a Filmmaker George is damaging his legacy and the integrity of his films with all of these pointless revisions. I'm just angry that he flatly refuses to release the OT as they originally were (perhaps with some minor effects enhancements) in high quality sound and picture.100k wrote...
TheShogunOfHarlem wrote...
You guys haven't heard the news.100k wrote...
Bad King wrote...
Fata Morgana wrote...
100k wrote...
Seriously Lucas! Replacing the police mens guns with Walkie Talkies in ET?
Er, that was Steven Spielberg that had ET edited, not Lucas.
Oy, kids today.
Lucas has made much stranger edits to his films:
www.youtube.com/watch
God, somebody please punch that man in the head. Please.
I meant Lucas and Spielberg because they work so closely on films.
I honestly was a defender of George Lucas when the prequels came out. I honestly thought that generally the PT worked well. However there were some very critical flaws in Narrative focus, Dialogue and Actor/Director relations. 6 years after ROTS, Those issues I now see as huge fundamental flaws in the PT. What was the point of having Jar Jar? (no I'm not one of the Jar Jar Haters) Or General Greivous? Why not add more depth to Count Dooku instead of introducing Grievous. It was things like that made the Prequels into a huge narrative mess.
What the hell is wrong with that man? Somebody should just walk up to him in public, and scream "STOP RAPING OUR CHILDHOODS!"
Seriously, what the hell has Lucas done since the last SW movie -- hell, since ROTJ? Just remade his trilogies over and over again with different special effects??? I can't get over how unquestionably dumb he is.
JamieCOTC wrote...
ZenJestr wrote...
Mikeyzs94 wrote...
Awesome thread!!!very informative and easy to read
the only thing on my mind now is if kasumi will be back
it's heavily implied that both DLC characters are getting ME2 Wrex treatment...i.e. cameo only
Damn, I can't remember where, but I did read that you could interact w/ them this time. Maybe that's something. I'm sure you're right, but Kasumi was very popular, so it will be interesting how they deal with it.
A couple of months.I012345 wrote...
How long after ME2 is ME3 supposed to start? Is it a two year gap again?
I012345 wrote...
How long after ME2 is ME3 supposed to start? Is it a two year gap again?
Modifié par Vertigo_1, 04 septembre 2011 - 05:42 .
I012345 wrote...
How long after ME2 is ME3 supposed to start? Is it a two year gap again?
Err, there are many 32 year olds who don't look like a worn out old scarred and pitted battle axe like Shepard does. Shepard looks like that because in addition to surviving numerous firefights, he got burned up and dismembered after falling through a planet's atmosphere from space. Sheploo in ME3 looks much older than his actual age.100k wrote...
I consider his death to not change his age. He's 32. Explains why he looks so tired.
Modifié par marshalleck, 04 septembre 2011 - 08:34 .
Modifié par faneriewar, 04 septembre 2011 - 09:02 .
faneriewar wrote...
While we're discussing the age of Sheploo, here are the ages for other characters during ME3.
Kaidan Alenko (35), Ashley Williams (28), Liara T'Soni (109), David Anderson (49), Miranda Lawson (36), Jacob Taylor (29), Kasumi Goto (26), Thane Krios (40), Tali (25), Joker (31), and Jack (25).
As for service in the Alliance.
Shepard leading with 14 years, if he was still considered part of the Alliance after the start of ME2. Kaidan with 13 and Ashley with 12.
The intel to gather this came from the ME timeline. Did this months ago, sorry if the years are inaccurate.
EDIT: Made a mistake, I used the Arrival year to calculate this. . . not the year in which ME3 occurs.
LGTX wrote...
Humans live up to 150 years on average in the ME universe. Medical advancements. Deducing age from a character's appearance may be a fool's errand when you think about it.
Retour en haut
