ME3: Known Features - Closing Comments
#2251
Posté 23 octobre 2011 - 09:33
#2252
Posté 24 octobre 2011 - 12:59
Ah, for ****'s sake...variobunz wrote...
- social games are planned for ME3 to ingrease your "readiness-level" (Facebook, Google+...)
- Also Apps for smartphones and tablets will give you a possibility to ingrease your "readiness-level"
And this is quite ridiculous. It would be understandable if you were just fighting glowies in the multiplayer mode, but there's more than enough people willing to fight for Cerberus.- No PvP mode is planned. Reason: "For a believable story it would make no sense." - Casey Hudson
#2253
Posté 24 octobre 2011 - 05:06
Kaiser Shepard wrote...
but there's more than enough people willing to fight for Cerberus.
You mean willing to fight for humanity.
#2254
Posté 24 octobre 2011 - 05:07
marshalleck wrote...
Kaiser Shepard wrote...
but there's more than enough people willing to fight for Cerberus.
You mean willing to fight for humanity.
They're one in the same.
#2255
Posté 24 octobre 2011 - 05:20
Good man. That was the correct response.Seboist wrote...
marshalleck wrote...
Kaiser Shepard wrote...
but there's more than enough people willing to fight for Cerberus.
You mean willing to fight for humanity.
They're one in the same.
#2256
Posté 24 octobre 2011 - 05:23
#2257
Posté 24 octobre 2011 - 08:28
#2258
Posté 24 octobre 2011 - 09:33
Also, what's with the new title?
#2259
Posté 24 octobre 2011 - 10:50
And this title is a very possible scenario
Modifié par variobunz, 24 octobre 2011 - 10:51 .
#2260
Posté 24 octobre 2011 - 11:16
Near sociopaths willing to fight for the secondary antagonist of the game?Kaiser Shepard wrote...
And this is quite ridiculous. It would be understandable if you were just fighting glowies in the multiplayer mode, but there's more than enough people willing to fight for Cerberus.
Coolio.
That'd be like wanting to play as Garganensis in the MP mode of AoM.
Modifié par Phaedon, 24 octobre 2011 - 11:22 .
#2261
Posté 24 octobre 2011 - 11:35
Phaedon wrote...
Kaiser Shepard wrote...
And this is quite ridiculous. It would be understandable if you were just fighting glowies in the multiplayer mode, but there's more than enough people willing to fight for Cerberus.
Near sociopaths willing to fight for the secondary antagonist of the game?
Coolio.
That'd be like wanting to play as Garganensis in the MP mode of AoM.
Considering how many people jump at the chance to play as a Sith or Forsaken (etc etc.) playing as a member of Cerberus almost seems tame by comparison.
I'm not exactly upset at there being no PVP, I'm more interested in the co op componant anyway, but it was definitely feasible and wouldn't of necessarily broken believability.
#2262
Posté 24 octobre 2011 - 11:46
Besides, the people who I am referring to,know who they are. ;-)
#2263
Posté 24 octobre 2011 - 01:57
Phaedon wrote...
Seeing as both of these factions are primary enemies who do not, literally receive injuries on their buttocks, I don't understand your comparison.
Besides, the people who I am referring to,know who they are. ;-)
Hey Phaedon, I couldn't find the update so, what's with the new thread's title?
#2264
Posté 24 octobre 2011 - 02:12
Kaiser Shepard wrote...
Ah, for ****'s sake...variobunz wrote...
- social games are planned for ME3 to ingrease your "readiness-level" (Facebook, Google+...)
- Also Apps for smartphones and tablets will give you a possibility to ingrease your "readiness-level"
Completely agree w/ you there.
And this is quite ridiculous. It would be understandable if you were just fighting glowies in the multiplayer mode, but there's more than enough people willing to fight for Cerberus.- No PvP mode is planned. Reason: "For a believable story it would make no sense." - Casey Hudson
True enough if the Cerberus troops were willing recruits fighting for humanity, but there could be a plot element that prevents them from being willing allies. Clones, indoctrination, etc.
Modifié par JamieCOTC, 24 octobre 2011 - 02:14 .
#2265
Guest_Arcian_*
Posté 24 octobre 2011 - 02:16
Guest_Arcian_*
Renegade circlejerking at its finest.marshalleck wrote...
Good man. That was the correct response.Seboist wrote...
marshalleck wrote...
Kaiser Shepard wrote...
but there's more than enough people willing to fight for Cerberus.
You mean willing to fight for humanity.
They're one in the same.
Modifié par Arcian, 24 octobre 2011 - 02:28 .
#2266
Posté 24 octobre 2011 - 02:31
Will my Shepards need a new "surgery" in order to cure, for a 2nd time, the flesh eating bacteria on their faces ?
#2267
Posté 24 octobre 2011 - 03:12
#2268
Guest_Arcian_*
Posté 24 octobre 2011 - 03:38
Guest_Arcian_*
You win the "You win the award"-award.Thessair wrote...
Merely a humorous title, methinks.
#2269
Posté 24 octobre 2011 - 03:42
jwalker wrote...
What's with the thread title ?
Will my Shepards need a new "surgery" in order to cure, for a 2nd time, the flesh eating bacteria on their faces ?
Holy Hera, another Guild Wars avatar.
At any rate, the title is referring to the developer tweet stating that Normandy upgrades gained in ME2 will have some sort of effect in ME3. Probably the only upgrade many of us ever skipped was the 50k platinum surgery center. I never bothered with it for any of my Paragons (why would I?) and for at least half of my Renegades.
#2270
Posté 24 octobre 2011 - 04:38
Meh, from an in-universe perspective everything is justifiable in one way or another. I look at it and simply say "bad writing", as this series was supposed to be about choice.JamieCOTC wrote...
Kaiser Shepard wrote...
Ah, for ****'s sake...variobunz wrote...
- social games are planned for ME3 to ingrease your "readiness-level" (Facebook, Google+...)
- Also Apps for smartphones and tablets will give you a possibility to ingrease your "readiness-level"
Completely agree w/ you there.And this is quite ridiculous. It would be understandable if you were just fighting glowies in the multiplayer mode, but there's more than enough people willing to fight for Cerberus.- No PvP mode is planned. Reason: "For a believable story it would make no sense." - Casey Hudson
True enough if the Cerberus troops were willing recruits fighting for humanity, but there could be a plot element that prevents them from being willing allies. Clones, indoctrination, etc.
#2271
Posté 24 octobre 2011 - 05:56
A single sentence should do finely for most of the redundant ones if they even deserve a call out.
#2272
Posté 24 octobre 2011 - 06:29
really bioware really? You have to have facebook to complete the game? WTF.
#2273
Posté 24 octobre 2011 - 06:41
Of course you won't HAVE to use Facebook to complete the game, don't be daft. They've already said that the best ending is possible entirely in the single-player campaign.Abirn wrote...
Way to exclude those of us who don't have social media accounts like factbook or google+
really bioware really? You have to have facebook to complete the game? WTF.
Besides, most people have Facebook or at least some kind of social network profile anyway. I don't know why you'd be against social networking when you use BSN - which is a form of social network.
#2274
Posté 24 octobre 2011 - 07:46
#2275
Posté 24 octobre 2011 - 07:48
Abirn wrote...
Way to exclude those of us who don't have social media accounts like factbook or google+
really bioware really? You have to have facebook to complete the game? WTF.
That is jumping the gun to an absolutely absurd proportion. BioWare would never do that.





Retour en haut





