I disagree. Who was it who said something like 'zealots are easy to sway to ones side, because they are already used to rationalizing contradictions'?Medhia Nox wrote...
@Dean_The_Young: Zealots tend not to have a clause in their belief structure that allows them to basically "try on" another person's belief system for a time.
That alone creates a completely new character archetype in my opinion.
Samara never 'tried on' Shepard's belief system, she agreed to obey him even in contradition of what her ideology would normally demand as part of her own ideology. That's pretty much par-for-course for zealot agents of every ideology known to man when working for some greater good with non-believers. Pro-democracy military official who believe the best way to save a democracy is to launch a coup. Pro-communisum agents who support, well, non-communist dictators. Christian ideologues who agree to work for a heathen state. Etc.
Old news.
No, but then I can't particularly imagine Rambo as a Renegade, nor did Samara assimilate Shepard's ethics.Could you imagine some Renegade - let's say, Rambo - meeting Gandhi and saying: "I don't believe in your way of acting - but I will assimilate to your code of ethics while I am with you."
Could you imagine Gandhi talking to Rambo and saying the same thing (never mind that one is a fictional character and one was real).
No, what Samara does is pretty standard for ideologues who need to work with non-believers for the good of their own ideology.It's hard enough for forum goers to come to a consensus of opinion - what Samara does is beyond human capability.





Retour en haut





