Matriarch
I'd
Like to
Fornicate
I haven't really used her in any of my playthroughs, but I imagine Throw + Plasma Shotty + Mattock = Unlimited Power
Modifié par Zakatak757, 19 septembre 2011 - 02:06 .
Modifié par Zakatak757, 19 septembre 2011 - 02:06 .
Modifié par Flamewielder, 19 septembre 2011 - 04:44 .
The Justicars aren't sworn to any constiutional authority: if they were, the Asari political elite wouldn't be so wary of a coup, and someone could have just ordered Samara not to break out.Flamewielder wrote...
You're right. The police officer actually comments on it, further supporting this conclusion. The Third Oath (the one sworn to an individual) appears to be rarely invoked. I infer that the First and Second Oath likely subsume the justicar(s) to higher levels of authority or constitutional documents (such as the US Oath of Alliegance). That would make them more common, at least common enough to become part of popular lore.
Flamewielder wrote...
Heavy Reave + Mattock + Throw is what I use with Samara. She's not as versatile as Miri (Heavy Warp + Disruption + Squad damage boost) but great against strong biotic barrier users like collector assassins, asari sentinels and Harbinger.
If I expect a lot of mechs/geths, I'll rather use more techy types like Legion, Garrus, Kasumi or Tali.
Samara and Miri are my favorite team for the final stage of the SM.
Dean_the_Young wrote...
No, but then I can't particularly imagine Rambo as a Renegade, nor did Samara assimilate Shepard's ethics.
Could you imagine some Renegade - let's say, Rambo - meeting Gandhi and saying: "I don't believe in your way of acting - but I will assimilate to your code of ethics while I am with you."
Could you imagine Gandhi talking to Rambo and saying the same thing (never mind that one is a fictional character and one was real).
Dean_the_Young wrote...
The Justicars aren't sworn to any constiutional authority: if they were, the Asari political elite wouldn't be so wary of a coup, and someone could have just ordered Samara not to break out.Flamewielder wrote...
You're right. The police officer actually comments on it, further supporting this conclusion. The Third Oath (the one sworn to an individual) appears to be rarely invoked. I infer that the First and Second Oath likely subsume the justicar(s) to higher levels of authority or constitutional documents (such as the US Oath of Alliegance). That would make them more common, at least common enough to become part of popular lore.
The Justicars are independent, not government-controlled, government-owned, or government-sanctioned. The closest they come is that the Asari Oaths of Subsumission include the defense of Asari common law and culture... which has the effect of that they (probably) won't overthrow an unjust government. But the Justicars do not answer to the government.
Justicars aren't sworn to the state. Justicars are sworn to the Code, and the Code's relationship with the state is non-subserviant.
She's great to have along during the suicide mission against Harbinger, but I often wonder why she would need an SMG if she has unlimited ammo capacity for her assault rifle. Was always confused by the developers' decision to equip her that way.jamesp81 wrote...
Samara stomps all over Collectors and other biotic enemies. And unlike Miranda who carries an SMG and a pistol, Samara brings some real conventional firepower to the field with her assault rifle training. I guess that's the benefit of multiple centuries of combat experience.
Ugh. No cure has been seriously tried for because the asari refuse to break their damned silence on the matter. And it's not just about getting salarian help; hell, humans invented medigel. They tend to be good at unorthodox situations, or initially unsolvable problems. I honestly can't support any asari who takes action related to Ardat-Yakshi that involves supporting the status quo.There is no cure in sight
Xilizhra wrote...
Ugh. No cure has been seriously tried for because the asari refuse to break their damned silence on the matter. And it's not just about getting salarian help; hell, humans invented medigel. They tend to be good at unorthodox situations, or initially unsolvable problems. I honestly can't support any asari who takes action related to Ardat-Yakshi that involves supporting the status quo.There is no cure in sight
Flamewielder wrote...
I know the SMG would rip through shields faster than the Mattock, but I never bother switching... too lazy I guess.
Modifié par Lizardviking, 21 septembre 2011 - 01:41 .
Well, they really suck at it. It's possible for their overtures to other scientific groups to be fairly discreet if they don't want to cause a public panic, which I don't think would last that long. Science advances slowest when it's done alone.I would imagine that the Asari are constantly trying to make a cure for the AY. Given that it seems to be their one great shameful secret.
Guest_RambosoGrinton_*
Xilizhra wrote...
Ugh. No cure has been seriously tried for because the asari refuse to break their damned silence on the matter. And it's not just about getting salarian help; hell, humans invented medigel. They tend to be good at unorthodox situations, or initially unsolvable problems. I honestly can't support any asari who takes action related to Ardat-Yakshi that involves supporting the status quo.There is no cure in sight
Modifié par TK514, 24 septembre 2011 - 04:28 .
When there is evidence of a cure being sought, I'll concede.Just for the sake of debate, unless you have access to sources I'm unfamiliar with, the idea that no cure has been sought, or even that no outside assistance has been solicited, seems to be an assumption on your part. It doesn't make much sense that the Asari -wouldn't- look or a cure, and hiding the condition from the galactic community is a general statement that does not rule out discreet inquiries having been made. It's not as though the term is unknown outside the Asari. I believe it is used by multiple non-asari during the course of ME2.
Xilizhra wrote...
When there is evidence of a cure being sought, I'll concede.Just for the sake of debate, unless you have access to sources I'm unfamiliar with, the idea that no cure has been sought, or even that no outside assistance has been solicited, seems to be an assumption on your part. It doesn't make much sense that the Asari -wouldn't- look or a cure, and hiding the condition from the galactic community is a general statement that does not rule out discreet inquiries having been made. It's not as though the term is unknown outside the Asari. I believe it is used by multiple non-asari during the course of ME2.
True, but the burden of proof is on the one claiming for there to be something.TK514 wrote...
Xilizhra wrote...
When there is evidence of a cure being sought, I'll concede.Just for the sake of debate, unless you have access to sources I'm unfamiliar with, the idea that no cure has been sought, or even that no outside assistance has been solicited, seems to be an assumption on your part. It doesn't make much sense that the Asari -wouldn't- look or a cure, and hiding the condition from the galactic community is a general statement that does not rule out discreet inquiries having been made. It's not as though the term is unknown outside the Asari. I believe it is used by multiple non-asari during the course of ME2.
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
Xilizhra wrote...
True, but the burden of proof is on the one claiming for there to be something.TK514 wrote...
Xilizhra wrote...
When there is evidence of a cure being sought, I'll concede.Just for the sake of debate, unless you have access to sources I'm unfamiliar with, the idea that no cure has been sought, or even that no outside assistance has been solicited, seems to be an assumption on your part. It doesn't make much sense that the Asari -wouldn't- look or a cure, and hiding the condition from the galactic community is a general statement that does not rule out discreet inquiries having been made. It's not as though the term is unknown outside the Asari. I believe it is used by multiple non-asari during the course of ME2.
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
That's a rather inventive interpretation. Law-enforcement, by its nature, is quite often an anti-majority force. Nor does cooperation with a law-enforcement have anything to do with submitting to popular opinion.Flamewielder wrote...
Justicars bind themselves to obey the will of the majority everytime they cooperate with law-enforcement agencies, which I'm guessing happens on a regular basis. Binding themselves through oaths of subsumation to cooperate with police implies a (temporary) endorsement of the Law.
They are duty bound to help police for twenty-four hours, and then are free to resume whatever they want. That there is a time-limit of such narrow width rather implies against constant cooperation by rule of the Code.I think Justicars are ideologues that will cooperate with asari governments, as they are duty bound to do so as long as said government aims to comply with the Code's values, if not letter.