161 réponses à ce sujet

[Siona]

There is not enough DO NOT WANT in the world for me to voice how much I would hate multi-player for ME3, and if that's seriously the only, only, ONLY reason it's been extended into 2012 rather than taking the time to polish its already existing features to a shine, I will be pretty damn disappointed.

[JetsoverEverything]

Lumikki wrote...

Bioware has allready sayed, NO multiplayer in ME3.
It's allready in sticky threads.

What comes after ME3 story is other question. But hole ME Shepard story has been single player game and it's good at it. Why **** up it with features what most of forum members here doesn't even want.

you still belive what bioware says?

man they lie to us all the time lol

[Lumikki]

marshalleck wrote...

Your source is bull****. Look at what charmingcharlie wrote to you just a few moments ago. If you actually read the GameInforer article you keepp citing, it doesn't in any way explicitly confirm that there will not be MP in ME3.

I don't think you get it. It's allready confirmed that NO multiplayer.

What you say is: that someone in Bioware did not confirm it or deny, one way or other.

You deside to conclude that means it's not confirmed, because you choose to. That's just rumor.
Have they change they mind, that's just rumor, but latest info what we really have is confirmed no multiplayer.

Can Bioware change they mind, of course they can, they often say nothing is final. How ever, official current statement from Bioware is: No multiplayer. They confirment it for that magazine, what you think about it, is irrelevant.

[CroGamer002]

marshalleck wrote...

Mesina2 wrote...

No proof that this is true.


It's just a wild rumor where someones needs to lose his teethes for spreading it.

Ray Muzyka should lose his teeth?

http://www.pcgamer.c...player-and-mmo/

Watch the video yourself. When asked a direct, easy to answer question "will ME3 have multiplayer" he starts dodging and evading, saying "nothing to announce."

If MP in ME3 were completely off the table, why wouldn't he just say "no MP in ME3"?

He needs to lose his teeths for that.

Casey already said twice it won't happen.


And why would they make it?
Both fans and reviewers are against it.

[squee365]

Someone said Casey Hudson tweeted about ME3 being singleplayer only, but I just looked through all his tweets and couldn't find anything.

[charmingcharlie]

Lumikki wrote...

I don't think you get it. It's allready confirmed that NO multiplayer.

What you say is: that someone in Bioware did not confirm it or deny, one way or other.

I don't think YOU quite get it, it has NOT been confirmed.  The link you posted was a summary of the Game Informer article in which Casey most definitely DID NOT rule out MP in Mass Effect 3.  I have already posted exactly what he said and at no point does he say "there will be no MP in Mass Effect 3".  Unless I am missing something, so here is what Casey said again :-

Casey Hudson wrote ... We haven't YET come up with a way to do that, so we don't have anything to announce at this time. But obviously muliplayer is something we want to do more of in the future as a company.

Now please show me WHERE in that statement he says "there will be no MP in Mass Effect 3".  Until we get a Bioware employee saying "there will be no MP in Mass Effect 3" then you cannot claim it has been confirmed there will be no MP in Mass Effect 3.

Modifié par charmingcharlie, 16 juin 2011 - 04:11 .

[Massadonious1]

It almost sounds like you hope it's true.

[Brownfinger]

Mesina2 wrote...

He needs to lose his teeths for that.

Casey already said twice it won't happen.


And why would they make it?
Both fans and reviewers are against it.

No. YOU are against it.
Make the distinction.

[squee365]

No we don't we just want closure and a definite answer. If its confirmed, I'll probably complain about it, if not then Yay bioware for having balls.

[United_Strafes]

There's like 10 freaking threads about this ****, and you make a new one......

[Jaron Oberyn]

@marshalleck - I agree, both of them are abusing their "powers". Javier mostly with his biased lockdowns and threats against users, but phaedon as well. It's obvious that multiplayer is going to be in the game, it's just a matter of when they announce it

-Polite

[Lumikki]

charmingcharlie wrote...

Casey Hudson wrote ...
We haven't YET come up with a way to do that, so we don't have anything to announce at this time. But obviously muliplayer is something we want to do more of in the future as a company.

Can you please provide bigger quote from that Magazines text both sides, so I can judge my self. What you quote there lacks all connection to anything, it's too seperated sentenses.

Modifié par Lumikki, 16 juin 2011 - 04:16 .

[marshalleck]

Lumikki wrote...

marshalleck wrote...

Your source is bull****. Look at what charmingcharlie wrote to you just a few moments ago. If you actually read the GameInforer article you keepp citing, it doesn't in any way explicitly confirm that there will not be MP in ME3.

I don't think you get it. It's allready confirmed that NO multiplayer.

No it is not confirmed that there's no multiplayer. Every time you say this, you link to someone else interpreting a journalists interpretation of statements from Bioware. Ever heard of "Chinese whispers"?

"the first player whispers a phrase or sentence to the next player. Each player successively whispers what that player believes he or she heard to the next. The last player announces the statement to the entire group. Errors typically accumulate in the retellings, so the statement announced by the last player differs significantly, and often amusingly, from the one uttered by the first."

That's exactly what "no multiplayer" amounts to. Here Ray Muzyka is directly refuting that with a very clear "neither confirmed nor denied" and you just keep on babbling about Phaedon's known features thread. Look, I understand you really don't want MP in ME3. I understand why you fear it will hurt the development of the single player campaign. It's a valid concern. But you need to just face it. It's not completely written off just yet. 

Modifié par marshalleck, 16 juin 2011 - 04:17 .

[CitizenJape]

Mass Effect multiplayer, at some point, becomes an inevitability. As those before have said, it wouldn't make sense in the 3rd installment of a game designed to tell the tale of ONE man/woman saving the galaxy. It's impossible to have 2 Shepard's on screen. And it wouldn't make sense, given the rich narratives that BioWare creates, to have us just pick some random mercs and go shoot it out on a multiplayer map with some ridiculous perk system to "supplement" the single player game. However, if it were possible to forgo the AI for a friend controlling a party member....

[Flashlegend]

No Multiplayer in ME3 has not been confirmed. When Devs are questioned about it they dodge the question. Simple as that. You can take that how you will, but saying that no MP has been confirmed is a lie. I have the Game informer article in front of me. No where does it explicitly say there is no multiplayer. They can summarize it in that way but that doesn't mean its true.

Also, I find it to be very abusive on JB's part that he can just continuously close threads like this just because he believe there will be no multiplayer even though it hasn't been explicity confirmed.

Modifié par Flashlegend, 16 juin 2011 - 04:19 .

[Forsythia]

BioWare will probably dodge the question until they see the time fit to confirm that there is indeed a multiplayer feature in ME3. I seriously think there will be some form of multiplayer tacked on the game. Why? EA thinks every game should need multiplayer, look at Dead Space 2. Was it fun? Sure, for a week. And that's what is going to happen to ME3 multiplayer: dead after a few weeks. Wasted resources if you ask me.

Multiplayer in the ME universe? Fine, but after ME3 please.

Modifié par Forsythia, 16 juin 2011 - 04:19 .

[BloodyTalon]

Another Mp Thread, alright so is mass effect mp or single player is a scifi version of two worlds or not?

[CroGamer002]

Brownfinger wrote...

Mesina2 wrote...

He needs to lose his teeths for that.

Casey already said twice it won't happen.


And why would they make it?
Both fans and reviewers are against it.

No. YOU are against it.
Make the distinction.

I remember that last year made wishlist about ME3 and in from one of thing it was no mulitplayer.
For crying out laud, it's IGN!
They would ussualy want that.


Also how long are you on this forums.
Vast majority is against ME3 multiplayer, though open for spin of game with multiplayer.


Also 9 months is just not enough to make multiplayer on game with this game mechanics on 3 platforms.

Infinity Ward and Treyarch are making Call of Duty every year( 2 years for each) and they have short singleplayer and multiplayer that always has some problem.


And they are experienced with that thing for over a decade. Come on now.

[marshalleck]

Forsythia wrote...

BioWare will probably dodge the question until they see the time fit to confirm that there is indeed a multiplayer feature in ME3. I seriously think there will be some form of multiplayer tacked on the game. Why? EA thinks every game should need multiplayer, look at Dead Space 2. Was it fun? Sure, for a week. And that's what is going to happen to ME3 multiplayer: dead after a few weeks. Wasted resources if you ask me.

Multiplayer in the ME universe? Fine, but after ME3 please.

And to answer a question I've seen before, which on the face of it seems like a good argument "if ME3 had multiplayer, why not announce it at E3?"

Because as Ray Muzyka and Casey have both said, they're still looking at how it would be implemented in ME3. They have nothing to show at E3, so they won't announce it. How bad would it look for them to say "ME3 would have such and such MP mode, but we don't have anything to show you so now let's forget about that and take a look at this combat demo..."

So again. Not saying it's in the game, just saying it hasn't been written off like some members of the community want you to think. Bioware are obviously trying very hard to keep their options open here and not paint themselves into a corner of "but you PROMISED there would be NO MULTIPLAYER IN ME3!!"

Modifié par marshalleck, 16 juin 2011 - 04:29 .

[efrgfhnm_]

The way I see it, if BioWare wants to make a game as critically acclaimed as the first two, and keep the fanbase happy, they won't have multiplayer.
If however they don't mind the reviews taking a hit and pissing off a huge number of ME fans in a feeble attempt to appeal to the casual COD crowd who are not going to bother with RPGs, then they'll go with multiplayer

[Someone With Mass]

Forsythia wrote...

BioWare will probably dodge the question until they see the time fit to confirm that there is indeed a multiplayer feature in ME3. I seriously think there will be some form of multiplayer tacked on the game. Why? EA thinks every game should need multiplayer, look at Dead Space 2. Was it fun? Sure, for a week. And that's what is going to happen to ME3 multiplayer: dead after a few weeks. Wasted resources if you ask me.

Multiplayer in the ME universe? Fine, but after ME3 please.

This.

There's really no need for multiplayer, since Mass Effect became what it is solely on singleplayer. I really hope those morons at EA can understand it.

[Moralio]

If it is indeed true then it is completely wasted development time.

[Sailears]

I would imagine they're trying out something, but not yet confident if it will be suitable/work out for the final release.

If it does, then they haven't denied it; if it doesn't then they can just let it slip away.


[Personally I don't want to see/don't really care for any sort of multiplayer, so I hope it doesn't work out (apologies to any people who may be working hard at it! )]

Modifié par Curunen, 16 juin 2011 - 04:32 .

[Paraxial]

Oh good, more completely unnecessary additions to the game. This partnered with Kinect, and we're on our way to a great experience cluttered with **** I don't need.

[masterkajo]

Brownfinger wrote...

As I said in the "features" thread:

I was emphatically opposed to multiplayer in Mass Effect. But as it's detailed there, that's the most intelligent and appealing way to implement it.
Missions outside of the main story, dedicated solely to the multiplayer component, have potential to be amazing. Imagine a four player squad of Turians, Palaven crumbling and burning all around them, fighting off oncoming Husk waves, trying to hold out as long as they can to buy civilian transports enough time to affect their escape. Give these scenarios context within the overall story and flesh out the universe by showing that the conflict is so huge that it encompasses far beyond what we see through the eyes of Shepard.

I'm converted. I'd *love* to play that.

You made me a believer!... I guess if done right it could very well be an addition to the game.