The only viable reason to end it is because of the final reaper invasion, but who says they are the only threat in the universe. Like Soveriegn said there is a relm of existence beyond your comprehension. Give me your thoughts on Mass Effect ending and ideas on how they could continue the series.DONT LET MASS EFFECT DIE
WHY END MASS EFFECT?
#1
Posté 16 juin 2011 - 05:06
The only viable reason to end it is because of the final reaper invasion, but who says they are the only threat in the universe. Like Soveriegn said there is a relm of existence beyond your comprehension. Give me your thoughts on Mass Effect ending and ideas on how they could continue the series.DONT LET MASS EFFECT DIE
#2
Posté 16 juin 2011 - 05:07
#3
Posté 16 juin 2011 - 05:09
#4
Posté 16 juin 2011 - 05:11
#5
Posté 16 juin 2011 - 05:12
I have no doubt ME 3 will have an open ending as well.. "just in case"
#6
Posté 16 juin 2011 - 05:13
Modifié par Captain Iglo, 16 juin 2011 - 05:14 .
#7
Posté 16 juin 2011 - 05:15
What I hate is that when things have to go on and on....like halo 4. Why can't it just end?
#8
Posté 16 juin 2011 - 05:15
People need to read.
#9
Posté 16 juin 2011 - 05:15
LOL<3Captain Iglo wrote...
You honestly think that there is any chance, with the current state of the game industry in mind, that this is the last what we will see of the Mass Effect franchise?! Good sir you clearly underestimating EAs needs!
I love your Icon!
#10
Posté 16 juin 2011 - 05:17
TheCrakFox wrote...
The galaxy is only ever one uncharted relay away from an intergalactic war
#11
Posté 16 juin 2011 - 05:18
#12
Posté 16 juin 2011 - 05:18
Edit: Here's my idea:
I'd like to see something set in near future after the defeat of the Reapers. Here's how I'd like to see it:
Takes place 5 to 10 years after ME3. In ME3, Shepard and company defeated
the Reapers with finality. They're dead, gone, and not coming back. Shepard survived the Reaper War as did his crew, so they can make cameo appearances if desired, but this isn't particularly necessary.
The Council (no matter which one it was in your playthrough) was mostly or completely dissolved after the Reaper War. A new Council was formed which doesn't suck as much.
The homeworlds of humanity, the asari, the turians, and the salarians were saved from complete annihilation during the war, however the damage to all was extensive. The asari, turians, and salarians in particular have had a hard time as they also lost a lot of very large, prosperious colony worlds. Earth has lost perhaps 1/3 of its population (about 3 billion). Every race lost a lot of its heavy industries during the war.
The Quarians regained Rannoch and a few colony worlds. They are rebuilding, but have no military assistance to offer outside defending their own worlds. The Quarians have also been granted an embassy on the Citadel for their assistance during the Reaper War. The Migrant Fleet has been dismantled for resources to rebuild their worlds.
The Geth have completed their Dyson Sphere and almost all of them reside there at the moment, happy to be left alone.
By the time of ME4, reconstruction is going on in a big way, but for the near term none of the major races can project military power like they could previously. The Batarians and the various minor states of the Terminus Systems have stepped into this power vacuum. The Citadel races are able to do little beyond defend the heart of their own territory. As a result, various Terminus systems states have occupied large swathes of territory that once belonged to the humans, asari, turians, and salarians. The Council races are able to defend their homeworlds and their central, most wealthy surviving colonies. Outside of this small slice of civilized space, the rest of the galaxy has turned into the Wild West.
During all this turmoil, something happens with the mass relay network. No one is for sure why it happened or what caused it. One day, every mass relay in the entire damned galaxy activated. All of them. This puts the Council into a panic. Currently, Council law states that a dormant relay cannot be activated if the location of
the endpoint is not known. This law is to prevent another Rachni type disaster. Now, however, there are hundreds, possibly thousands of unexplored, previously dormant relays that are now active.
The Council starts recruiting every explorer and mercenary they can afford, and sends what military forces they can spare to explore the newly opened relays. The protagonist / player character is a former soldier from the Reaper War that the Council recruits as part of this effort. You will be able to choose between being a Human (former Alliance Marine), a Turian (former Turian Army soldier), an Asari (former Asari commando in the service of the Armali Council), a Quarian (former Migrant Fleet Marines combat engineer), or a Krogan (an Urdnot Battlemaster who made a name for himself during the Reaper War).
With all the Mass Relays active now, the galaxy just got a lot bigger, a lot more mysterious, and possibly a lot more dangerous.
The tone of this series would be different. Shepard's trilogy is an epic space opera, with huge stakes. This one would be more a dry humored, rambunctious romp across the galaxy. There'd still be strong antagonists, but we would likely not be looking at something like the Reapers again.
I also have no interest in an MMO. If Bioware wants to make one, that's fine, but I won't play it. If they make an MMO set just after ME3, and make it story-line neutral, and then use the profits to fund the next ME trilogy as I detailed above, I'm completely good with that.
I'll add that I think going with motley crew instead of "best of the best" kind of crew could be entertaining.
And I want my whole crew to be able to get in a barfight. In afterlife. With LaGrange by ZZ Top playing on the jukebox
Modifié par jamesp81, 16 juin 2011 - 06:39 .
#13
Posté 16 juin 2011 - 05:20
''Don't Stop there's so much to be found''
#14
Posté 16 juin 2011 - 05:21
I will miss shepard but then i want to know who the main character will be in the new mass effect series
#15
Posté 16 juin 2011 - 05:22
MMO after a few years.
#16
Posté 16 juin 2011 - 05:26
#17
Posté 16 juin 2011 - 05:28
Captain Iglo wrote...
You honestly think that there is any chance, with the current state of the game industry in mind, that this is the last what we will see of the Mass Effect franchise?! Good sir you clearly underestimating EAs needs!
I have full confidence in BioWare's ability to produce another great Mass Effect game that doesn't feature Shepard on any of his/her companions (probably will have to take place a few 100 years in the future). However with EA you never know what's going to happen. They might make a Mass Effect mmo instead of ME4. They might turn it into an fps, whatever makes the most money.
As for me, I consider ME3 the end of the franchise FOR NOW and depending on what EA is making BioWare turn the franchise into I'll think about a possible ME4.
Continuing Shep's story would become increasingly difficult - with the variables of our various decisions quickly getting out of hand. Revisiting the ME universe should work fine - and I can see any number of games taking advantage of the setting. Even another Shooter/RPG hybrid would be welcome, particulalry one with more open gameplay and ability to play different species.
They've already confirmed ME3 is the end of Shepard's story. Not letting his story end here and instead move on to a 4th ME game where Shepard still faces a galactic civil war would be one of the worst things they could do right now.
Modifié par Robhuzz, 16 juin 2011 - 05:29 .
#18
Posté 16 juin 2011 - 05:36
KainrycKarr wrote...
We know, 100% that ME3 is not the last ME game; just the last in Shepard's story.
People need to read.
But the OP makes a good point! A better question would be:
Would you stop getting Mass Effect games because Shepard's part in it is over?
This is a fair question because they've spent so much time getting you attached to every character since the beginning and to not "see" them would be devastating to some.
Just like in media where a beloved character doesn't return. It may not be that character's story anymore, but it wouldn't make it less painful to watch without that character. Being Commander Sheperd is the reason people picked this game up and even though you can play with your fav squadmate (just go it) - in my case, it be Miranda, as much as I love for her to save the galaxy, that's was/is reserved for Commander Sheperd.
It would be a very egregious assumption if I said, I'd never play another game again; however, shouldn't people feel a sense of loss as that is what Sheperd's part in the series is about? Not a war, but people you care about? It'd be very hard to get into if they made the "Galactic War" story just that as ot won't have the "human" element to it which they have emphasized since the beginning. (By human I mean all of the civilations combating the Reaper Threat and all the little things in between)
#19
Posté 16 juin 2011 - 05:40
#20
Posté 16 juin 2011 - 05:42
This trilogy has actually followed a remarkable parallel to the original Star Wars trilogy. The first was being transplanted into a universe and events that were suddenly picking up speed. The second was a darker time with a slower threat but a massive conflict on the horizon. And the third was an epic, cinematic, war-torn blowout in, as thompsonaf said, a blaze of glory. Far better to end it here.
#21
Posté 16 juin 2011 - 05:43
Spin off games are expected.
#22
Posté 16 juin 2011 - 06:05
I'm sure there will be more to the ME series after ME3 but will feature a new main character and a new protagonist, maybe even in a new galaxy or something. But Shep's story is done with ME3, its time for the next generation of hero's to emerge.
#23
Posté 16 juin 2011 - 06:08
#24
Posté 16 juin 2011 - 06:10
andric07 wrote...
Bioware has spent the last 6 years building one of the most definitive titles of our generation. Mass effect has since then expanded greatly and picked up many fans along the way. I have become not only fond of the gameplay of mass effect but also emotionally attached to the characters and story. Seeing Commander Shepard grow into one of the greatest heroes of gaming like masterchief, i dont want to see it end and im sure lots of fans dont as well.
The only viable reason to end it is because of the final reaper invasion, but who says they are the only threat in the universe. Like Soveriegn said there is a relm of existence beyond your comprehension. Give me your thoughts on Mass Effect ending and ideas on how they could continue the series.DONT LET MASS EFFECT DIE
ABSOLUTELY NOT. Shepards story NEEDS to end after the final destruction of the reapers.
Why you ask? BECAUSE YOU CAN NOT TOP THE REAPERS AS A VILLIAN. Seriously, how are we supposed to take day to day galactic threats seriously when shepard JUST curbstomped the Reapers? And trying to increase the power of shepards foes past the reapers would just be silly. Oh they'll destroy the galaxy even harder oooooo.
The Mass Effect universe can be used in an RTS, an FPS, an MMO after Shepards story is done, but Shepard cannot be involved.
It'd be like making a cop drama where the main character is God with a capital G, there's no tension.
#25
Posté 16 juin 2011 - 06:12
Shep deserves a break from the Reaper BS after ME3.





Retour en haut






