Vault08 wrote...
The rachni 'allies' outnumbering the indoctrinated ones is up for debate. Who knows how many (maybe all?) the reapers have? What if they got the queen? Then the whole race is ****ed and instead of gaining an ally you get a new enemy.
Anderson looks much more keen on fighting on the frontlines and lending a helping hand on Earth. With the entire planet in disarray and the council at a loss for what to do, Anderson can't represent humanity and be partaking in firefights on Earth. As shown in the E3 demo he stays behind. Udina is much more level-headed when it comes to politics, and has more experience. He may not always do the right thing for the right reasons, but he wants the best for humanity. Kind of like the Illusive man, but not in the same way.
Yes you could argue that the allies may not outnumber the indoctrinated rachni and the reapers may have got the queen as you say, i argue different obviously. I'm basing my argument on the fact that there are many indoctrinated husks we know about in me3, Krogan,Asari,Batarian but it doesn't make sense that all of these races or even the majority of them are indoctrinated husks (if it did then we've already lost).
So taking it that the reapers have indoctrinated some of our potential allies but more than likely we still have more of those species on our side than the reapers do, it would also follow the same logic that the rachni would fall into this category. I of course could be wrong, but i'd say the evidence so far is in my favour (the queen said she'd help) rather than (she just dissappeared and said nothing) so i think we'll get more rachni as allies than as enemies.
Udina and Tim both having the best interests of humanity at heart, hmmm well then there now, By the looks of things and with what we know Tim is still in charge of a cerberus thats hunting Shepard (so which of those two do you really think has the best interests of humanity at heart?)
Anderson does by the look of things stay and fight on earth but giving the recon the novels gave he aint the councillor no matter what you did by the time we start me3, so we're stuck with Udina. Someone you say has the best interests of humanity at heart also, well i must have met a different Udina than you did.
He locked down the normandy not because of humanity's best interest considering Shepard was actually serving that by what he was doing but because it might create a politcal backlash against Udina (which considering Shepard was a spectre really makes no sense), He doesn't want Shepard to investigate the dissappearance of human colonies not because it might be happening but because its politically inconvieniant (anderson however doesn't try to stop or dissuade shepard and in fact gets shepard's spectre status reinstated.
Despite any evidence or claim shepard ever makes with or without evidence, Udina always takes the non supporting Shepard role which again is not based on humanities best interest but political convieniance.
Udina cares nothing about humanities best interest but whats best politically for Udina and if after 2 games you've come to a different conclussion then nothing i say will change your mind.
But if you don't think Udina at some point will try to screw with Shepard again, try to stop an action by Shepard or try to do whats best politically or physically for Udina and not humanity (represented as always by Shepard aka you) then your in for a shock.
Modifié par alperez, 16 juin 2011 - 11:17 .
Retour en haut
