27 réponses à ce sujet

[rolson00]

i'm sorry javier but i have to voice my concerns

myself like most of you on here have been hearing rumors of ME3 multiplayer, and some have posted links with their concerns about it.
well they are not going away, theres a thread with  a link here if you want a peek and now to what is worrying me.
 
well i'v just read more posts today and followed the links when javier gave up locking threads, and what i saw made my heart sink,

these rumors are ringing true,add that to the fact that bioware hasnt dissmissed them.
 
they havnt even got chris to post on here to say they arnt true. i dont know how many of you like me dont like multi players that much. i love the me series i loved the fact that they kept it single player.
 
i fear that they are going to be making us play online even if we dont mean to,
 i know that this is not their intension but its what will happen. i know this from the fable seires they force you to play online(remember fable 3 that xbox live deamon door inthe mistpeek vally? what about the achievments to marry another players char?).
im really really hoping that bioware arnt making ME3 mulitplayer. the chances are hight that afterME3 there will be a ME MMO which i wont be getting as i hate playing with other people you just cant do your own thing i hate having to relie on other people as well i hate it when other people steal your kills i most of all i that when another player is ina funny mood they start attacking you but most of all i hate hearing the micophones! i know a lot of do use micophones and im sorry but that is why i play single player games!
thankyou for lisening to me moaning, i would love to hear your views as on this as well
EDIT ad this rumored multie player to this kinect they are doing its all got to be taken out of somewhre hasnt it?

Modifié par rolson00, 16 juin 2011 - 11:02 .

[underhill1990]

If there is multiplayer, dont play it. Issue resolved, your welcome

[BestAlgorithm]

underhill1990 wrote...

If there is multiplayer, dont play it. Issue resolved, your welcome

It's not that simple. Do you really think it is?

[Tachai03]

Is multiplayer really that big of a concern? Nobody is forcing you to go the multiplayer route if it *does* exist.

I'm not understanding all the fuss surrounding this issue; just don't play multiplayer.

[underhill1990]

BestAlgorithm wrote...

underhill1990 wrote...

If there is multiplayer, dont play it. Issue resolved, your welcome

It's not that simple. Do you really think it is?

yes. 

[BestAlgorithm]

Tachai03 wrote...

Is multiplayer really that big of a concern? Nobody is forcing you to go the multiplayer route if it *does* exist.

I'm not understanding all the fuss surrounding this issue; just don't play multiplayer.

They're using resources that could be going to the single player experience. Rather than make the single player better they're tacking on a ****ty mode.

[Fogg]

I wouldn't mind multiplayer as long the singleplayer is good. Perhaps they should make the multiplayer a DLC...

In fact, who want's to join my clan?

[Ruud333]

My view is that this could have been posted in one of the other existing threads :-/

[underhill1990]

BestAlgorithm wrote...

Tachai03 wrote...

Is multiplayer really that big of a concern? Nobody is forcing you to go the multiplayer route if it *does* exist.

I'm not understanding all the fuss surrounding this issue; just don't play multiplayer.

They're using resources that could be going to the single player experience. Rather than make the single player better they're tacking on a ****ty mode.

I was not aware you already played the game

[BestAlgorithm]

underhill1990 wrote...

BestAlgorithm wrote...

underhill1990 wrote...

If there is multiplayer, dont play it. Issue resolved, your welcome

It's not that simple. Do you really think it is?

yes. 

(S)he'll be supporting they don't want to see. They'll be taking away resources that could be used for the single player aspect. Do you see how that works?

[BestAlgorithm]

underhill1990 wrote...

BestAlgorithm wrote...

Tachai03 wrote...

Is multiplayer really that big of a concern? Nobody is forcing you to go the multiplayer route if it *does* exist.

I'm not understanding all the fuss surrounding this issue; just don't play multiplayer.

They're using resources that could be going to the single player experience. Rather than make the single player better they're tacking on a ****ty mode.

I was not aware you already played the game

What does playing the game have to do with resource management and knowing what I like?

[SilentNukee]

My thread was locked, and I was saddened...Have you played AC: Brotherhood or Uncharted 2? If it's anything like that, we'll be fine. But, Priestly specifically told me in a message that it's just a rumor.

[Tachai03]

BestAlgorithm wrote...

Tachai03 wrote...

Is multiplayer really that big of a concern? Nobody is forcing you to go the multiplayer route if it *does* exist.

I'm not understanding all the fuss surrounding this issue; just don't play multiplayer.

They're using resources that could be going to the single player experience. Rather than make the single player better they're tacking on a ****ty mode.

I don't think Bioware would actually take quality out of the single player aspects of the game just because they implement multiplayer.

Also, what kind of "multiplayer" are we speculating about here? Maybe the multiplayer is completely seperate from the story and is just an add-on.

[Therefore_I_Am]

BestAlgorithm wrote...

underhill1990 wrote...

If there is multiplayer, dont play it. Issue resolved, your welcome

It's not that simple. Do you really think it is?

The one thing that would irritate me, is that if it were to be implemented, I would refer back to Casey Hudson saying that there won't be any multiplayer in ME3.
Don't say something than contradict yourself later on. That's all I ask.

Modifié par Therefore_I_Am, 16 juin 2011 - 11:04 .

[Quinnzel]

Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering.
I wouldn't worry about it, no need to run down the path of the Darkside.
...yet anyways, if they backtrack and confirm it, proceed directly to Part 2 of the Sith Code.

[rolson00]

Ruud333 wrote...

My view is that this could have been posted in one of the other existing threads :-/

they are lockdown

[Lumikki]

Rumor is rumor.

[underhill1990]

your assuming the single player will be sh**. The game already looks amazing and it comes out in march. So dont worry your little head about it.

[Sir Ulrich Von Lichenstien]

BestAlgorithm wrote...

underhill1990 wrote...

BestAlgorithm wrote...

underhill1990 wrote...

If there is multiplayer, dont play it. Issue resolved, your welcome

It's not that simple. Do you really think it is?

yes. 

(S)he'll be supporting they don't want to see. They'll be taking away resources that could be used for the single player aspect. Do you see how that works?

IF and note how I bolded and capitalised that if, the rumours are true, then they won't be taking resources from the singleplayer game because that is most likely going to be getting done by the Edmonton team with the Montreal team working on the MP aspect, which means resources aren't being taken away from the single player. Do you understand the concept of different teams working on different things?

[United_Strafes]

Why worry, if there was not going to be any multiplayer concept at all they would have said "there will be no multiplayer" at E3 instead of "we have nothing to announce".. The game looked pretty complete at E3 nothing that would warrant 4 extra months. So idk it'll probably be a crap add-in like the Dead Space 2 multi, didn't matter cause Dead Space 2 was still a good game.

Who knows maybe they will do a good job and it'll be hella fun, but I seriously doubt it.

[BestAlgorithm]

Tachai03 wrote...

BestAlgorithm wrote...

Tachai03 wrote...

Is multiplayer really that big of a concern? Nobody is forcing you to go the multiplayer route if it *does* exist.

I'm not understanding all the fuss surrounding this issue; just don't play multiplayer.

They're using resources that could be going to the single player experience. Rather than make the single player better they're tacking on a ****ty mode.

I don't think Bioware would actually take quality out of the single player aspects of the game just because they implement multiplayer.

Also, what kind of "multiplayer" are we speculating about here? Maybe the multiplayer is completely seperate from the story and is just an add-on.

It's not so much about taking away quality from the single player (although that's possible because of a lack of developers to work on polishing, bug checking, etc)... it's about not adding more to the single player because they're focusing on the multiplayer.

[underhill1990]

Therefore_I_Am wrote...

BestAlgorithm wrote...

underhill1990 wrote...

If there is multiplayer, dont play it. Issue resolved, your welcome

It's not that simple. Do you really think it is?

The one thing that would irritate me about this, is that if it were to be implemented, I would refer back to Casey Hudson saying that there won't be any multiplayer in ME3.
Don't say something than contradict yourself later on. That's all I ask.

I heard it will be a horde-esque co-op mode, not something like COD

[crimzontearz]

if the rumor turns out to be true I'llhave only onething to say

"thank you EA..../sarcasm"

[CrimsonNephilim]

Right now they are just rumors =/. We won't know for sure until Bioware comes out with a statement confirming/debunking all the MP talk going around, which is hopefully soon as there is a lot of concern about this from fans.

[BestAlgorithm]

Sir Ulrich Von Lichenstien wrote...

BestAlgorithm wrote...

underhill1990 wrote...

BestAlgorithm wrote...

underhill1990 wrote...

If there is multiplayer, dont play it. Issue resolved, your welcome

It's not that simple. Do you really think it is?

yes. 

(S)he'll be supporting they don't want to see. They'll be taking away resources that could be used for the single player aspect. Do you see how that works?

IF and note how I bolded and capitalised that if, the rumours are true, then they won't be taking resources from the singleplayer game because that is most likely going to be getting done by the Edmonton team with the Montreal team working on the MP aspect, which means resources aren't being taken away from the single player. Do you understand the concept of different teams working on different things?

You know what teams are going to work on which projects? And yes, I think that'd be a waste because the other team can focus on more singleplayer stuff.