Mass Effect movie: Live Action or CG? Why?
#26
Posté 17 juin 2011 - 05:34
#27
Posté 17 juin 2011 - 07:31
Green lantern should give us a good look in to whats possible with live-action and cgi aliens.
Modifié par Relief, 17 juin 2011 - 07:34 .
#28
Posté 17 juin 2011 - 07:41
#29
Posté 17 juin 2011 - 10:37
that's the only way to do it
#30
Posté 17 juin 2011 - 10:51
#31
Posté 17 juin 2011 - 10:58
Relief wrote...
Live-action and aliens CGI. Only if it rivals the level of CGI in Star Wars and Avatar.
Green lantern should give us a good look in to whats possible with live-action and cgi aliens.
Green Lantern's use of CGI was amazing
still the ME movie needs to be all in CGI, you want the original actors, this is not a movie from a comicbook which can be interpreted, we already HAD those actors infront of us for countless of hours, anything less would just not feel right
#32
Posté 17 juin 2011 - 11:02
chester013 wrote...
Eradyn wrote...
Most companies are starting to go this route with their movies. Resident Evil, Final Fantasy, Assassins Creed, Tekken.
These are all classic movies by the way... can I get a source to back up that "most companies" comment? Because it seems to me most companies are still making live action movies.
There's plenty you can do live action, and you fill in what you cant with cg special effects, those transformers were not guys in suits you know! It doesn't have to be one or the other. This is as pointless as asking whether it should be entirely CG or filmed in black and white with nothing but piano music.
I never said that. Might want to fix your quote.
#33
Posté 17 juin 2011 - 11:14
I'm pretty sure they've already said it won't be about Shepard.
First Contact War, Maybe? I think that sounds like the most logical timeframe because it can allow them to build a completely knew hero/ine and give us some Cameos from the likes of Hackett/Anderson before they were big shots.
#34
Posté 17 juin 2011 - 11:15
So CGI it is.
#35
Posté 17 juin 2011 - 11:35
Did no one see Galaxy Quest? Remember the villain in that? Sarris? He looked perfect an that was done with animatroinics over an actor.
A Good animatronic rig that captures actor performance would work perfectly for both Turian and Krogans . . . possibly Salarians as well (though you'd need small women to wear those outfits I think).
You'd definitely need CG for Hannar and perhaps Elcor soley for wide shots I guess, but most everyone else could be done with animatronics or good make up and costumes.
#36
Posté 18 juin 2011 - 12:15
#37
Posté 18 juin 2011 - 12:19
Dazaster Dellus wrote...
chester013 wrote...
There's plenty you can do live action, and you fill in what you cant with cg special effects, those transformers were not guys in suits you know! It doesn't have to be one or the other. This is as pointless as asking whether it should be entirely CG or filmed in black and white with nothing but piano music.
Plenty, doesn't mean it will be good. There is not one movie that I am aware of where they used live action in combination with wire work and have it look good. And don't say Star Wars. Also there are things you can get away with and cg that you can't with live action. For instance. not choreographed combat. Combat can be real and physical instead of it just being a couple of close punches mixed with well placed camera angles. If a Krogan punches Shepard in a live action.... unless the actors can really sell it, some people will see through it. If a Krogan punches Shepard in a CG movie, He can REALLY punch Shepard. With Biotic attacks they can really show the impact and gravity loss realistically without having to worry about an actors safety. Also they don't have to spend an overwhelming amount of money on actors and actresses to play the roles. Voice work doesn't get nearly as much as on camera work.
CG fights can be real and physical? I read the correctly?
#38
Posté 18 juin 2011 - 12:21
Eradyn wrote...
chester013 wrote...
Eradyn wrote...
Most companies are starting to go this route with their movies. Resident Evil, Final Fantasy, Assassins Creed, Tekken.
These are all classic movies by the way... can I get a source to back up that "most companies" comment? Because it seems to me most companies are still making live action movies.
There's plenty you can do live action, and you fill in what you cant with cg special effects, those transformers were not guys in suits you know! It doesn't have to be one or the other. This is as pointless as asking whether it should be entirely CG or filmed in black and white with nothing but piano music.
I never said that. Might want to fix your quote.
Indeed you did not! My bad.
#39
Posté 18 juin 2011 - 04:45
#40
Guest__Nev4r_*
Posté 18 juin 2011 - 04:47
Guest__Nev4r_*
#41
Posté 18 juin 2011 - 04:49
Dazaster Dellus wrote...
So here is the question. Mass Effect movie....we all know it's coming. So which would you rather see Bioware do, A CG movie or give the rights to a Hollywood company and make it live action? Why do you think it would be the best choice?
IMO, CG would be best for countless reasons. If not just for the main reason that Bioware would have absolute control of the storyline and the property, I would say that the with CG you can do countless things that you can't do in live action.....or at least do well. While I could sit here and list things all day I figure I would see what the general consensus is.
CG.
but its damned expensive which is a problem especially in this economic crisis.
If its live action then i think it'll degrade the ME universe. Hollywood had at times surprise me though.
#42
Posté 18 juin 2011 - 04:56
...and go with it to Blur. Then be praised for the best videogame related movie in history.
#43
Posté 18 juin 2011 - 07:59
#44
Posté 18 juin 2011 - 08:32
#45
Posté 18 juin 2011 - 08:46
Personally, I think a movie about the First Contact Wars could be pretty cool. It would be the hardest for Hollywood to **** up, IMO.





Retour en haut






