Aller au contenu

Photo

Is Ashley Still your girl?


1035 réponses à ce sujet

#276
whywhywhywhy

whywhywhywhy
  • Members
  • 697 messages

Made Nightwing wrote...
Look, I can't do a damn thing about how the writers worded the plot.

Agreed

Made Nightwing wrote...
If I had more details on the 5fth Fleet's manpower and resources., then I could make a better estimate.

True but the alliance has more resources then just fith fleet.  They have the Corsairs they could have and should have used them.

Made Nightwing wrote...
We only saw a fraction of the area that the Normandy crashed in. Say the initial search party had a limit of three weeks to conduct retrieval operations. that's enough time to remove many of the Normandy's critical systems that survived the crash, with standard errors such as equipment malfunctions and pirate's skirmishing with escort vessels. There are loopholes that give an indication as to what went wrong.

It retrieval is not possible then destruction is preferable.  The wreckage wasn't destroyed.  We know that critical systems most likely weren't removed because they left the dog tags.  But what your saying should have happened all the evidence we have so far points to it not happening.  And this is the problem. 

For this reason all others posted by Knight, laecraft and I, Ashley is no longer my girl.

#277
knightnblu

knightnblu
  • Members
  • 1 731 messages
The email from Hackett indicates that nobody has visited the Normandy SR1 crash site in two years and that if Shepard places the memorial, he will be the first. That means that the Alliance did in fact abandon Shepard and the 20 missing crewmen as well as the highly classified construction of the starship and its technologies.

As humanity's first Spectre, Shepard was somebody important. Abandoning him would be like abandoning Charles Lindbergh or Amelia Earhart without a search. But the Alliance did it. If they didn't know where the Normandy was planetside after retrieving the surviving crewmembers and being told which system the Normandy went down in, they sure as hell didn't look for his body or the bodies of the 20 crewmen missing in action.

That having been said, it would be a daunting task in order to find a cold object in space. However, 21 missing Alliance personnel, one of them humanity's first Spectre, should have warranted at least an attempt to do so. Despite the Alliance's failure, the Shadow Broker managed to retrieve Shepard's corpse. Could it be because he was the only one who even bothered to look?

If the Shadow Broker found Shep's corpse, you can bet dollars to doughnuts that he also retrieved the secrets of the SR1. That's two Alliance failures, if you are counting. Is it really any wonder that the Reapers now own Earth in ME3? The Alliance's failure to even look for the missing men and women who served in good faith led directly to Shepard becoming the property of Cerberus and the loss of highly sensitive military technology and possibly even sensitive data and codes if the Normandy's computers were not totally destroyed on impact. That is a massive failure by the Alliance.

Maybe the Alliance thought that they couldn't handle whatever took out the SR1. Maybe they just said the hell with Shepard and his missing crew. Maybe Williams did as well, isn't she Alliance through and through? Didn't she say that the Alliance was in her blood? If the Alliance is indeed so deeply embedded in Ashley's blood, as she stridently claims that it is on Horizon, why wouldn't she abandon Shepard? The Alliance certainly did.

What's more, the Alliance and Williams blame Shepard for what they are really responsible for despite the bitter irony of such an accusation. Somehow, I doubt that the writers of ME3 have even noticed this. But this is why Ashley's words on Horizon sounded hollow in my ears and why she needs to eat a lot of crow before I can forgive her for it.

#278
Guest_Catch This Fade_*

Guest_Catch This Fade_*
  • Guests
I had a "faithful to Ashley" playthrough until I switched Xbox 360s. I definitely plan on wooing her again and being faithful to her for another Shepard though. She may be a bit of a bigot, but she's my bigot.

Modifié par jreezy, 21 juillet 2011 - 11:23 .


#279
whywhywhywhy

whywhywhywhy
  • Members
  • 697 messages

knightnblu wrote...

The email from Hackett indicates that nobody has visited the Normandy SR1 crash site in two years and that if Shepard places the memorial, he will be the first. That means that the Alliance did in fact abandon Shepard and the 20 missing crewmen as well as the highly classified construction of the starship and its technologies.

As humanity's first Spectre, Shepard was somebody important. Abandoning him would be like abandoning Charles Lindbergh or Amelia Earhart without a search. But the Alliance did it. If they didn't know where the Normandy was planetside after retrieving the surviving crewmembers and being told which system the Normandy went down in, they sure as hell didn't look for his body or the bodies of the 20 crewmen missing in action.

That having been said, it would be a daunting task in order to find a cold object in space. However, 21 missing Alliance personnel, one of them humanity's first Spectre, should have warranted at least an attempt to do so. Despite the Alliance's failure, the Shadow Broker managed to retrieve Shepard's corpse. Could it be because he was the only one who even bothered to look?

If the Shadow Broker found Shep's corpse, you can bet dollars to doughnuts that he also retrieved the secrets of the SR1. That's two Alliance failures, if you are counting. Is it really any wonder that the Reapers now own Earth in ME3? The Alliance's failure to even look for the missing men and women who served in good faith led directly to Shepard becoming the property of Cerberus and the loss of highly sensitive military technology and possibly even sensitive data and codes if the Normandy's computers were not totally destroyed on impact. That is a massive failure by the Alliance.

Maybe the Alliance thought that they couldn't handle whatever took out the SR1. Maybe they just said the hell with Shepard and his missing crew. Maybe Williams did as well, isn't she Alliance through and through? Didn't she say that the Alliance was in her blood? If the Alliance is indeed so deeply embedded in Ashley's blood, as she stridently claims that it is on Horizon, why wouldn't she abandon Shepard? The Alliance certainly did.

What's more, the Alliance and Williams blame Shepard for what they are really responsible for despite the bitter irony of such an accusation. Somehow, I doubt that the writers of ME3 have even noticed this. But this is why Ashley's words on Horizon sounded hollow in my ears and why she needs to eat a lot of crow before I can forgive her for it.

When you spell it all out in a pretty package like that you leave me less ammo to debate with :D
I was giving them bread crumbs and we all know it leads to a delicious cake under a box mysteriously held up by stick and string.:ph34r::lol:

#280
Casterdael

Casterdael
  • Members
  • 70 messages
What strickens me as odd is that everyone blames Ashley for the debacle at Horizon. It was just basically Shepard who treated her as someone who he barely knew but talked to her because he was socially obliged to it. A huge lack of tact on Shepard's side. No wonder she exploded in his face.

#281
Guest_Catch This Fade_*

Guest_Catch This Fade_*
  • Guests

knightnblu wrote...

The email from Hackett indicates that nobody has visited the Normandy SR1 crash site in two years and that if Shepard places the memorial, he will be the first. That means that the Alliance did in fact abandon Shepard and the 20 missing crewmen as well as the highly classified construction of the starship and its technologies.

As humanity's first Spectre, Shepard was somebody important. Abandoning him would be like abandoning Charles Lindbergh or Amelia Earhart without a search. But the Alliance did it. If they didn't know where the Normandy was planetside after retrieving the surviving crewmembers and being told which system the Normandy went down in, they sure as hell didn't look for his body or the bodies of the 20 crewmen missing in action.

That having been said, it would be a daunting task in order to find a cold object in space. However, 21 missing Alliance personnel, one of them humanity's first Spectre, should have warranted at least an attempt to do so. Despite the Alliance's failure, the Shadow Broker managed to retrieve Shepard's corpse. Could it be because he was the only one who even bothered to look?

If the Shadow Broker found Shep's corpse, you can bet dollars to doughnuts that he also retrieved the secrets of the SR1. That's two Alliance failures, if you are counting. Is it really any wonder that the Reapers now own Earth in ME3? The Alliance's failure to even look for the missing men and women who served in good faith led directly to Shepard becoming the property of Cerberus and the loss of highly sensitive military technology and possibly even sensitive data and codes if the Normandy's computers were not totally destroyed on impact. That is a massive failure by the Alliance.

Maybe the Alliance thought that they couldn't handle whatever took out the SR1. Maybe they just said the hell with Shepard and his missing crew. Maybe Williams did as well, isn't she Alliance through and through? Didn't she say that the Alliance was in her blood? If the Alliance is indeed so deeply embedded in Ashley's blood, as she stridently claims that it is on Horizon, why wouldn't she abandon Shepard? The Alliance certainly did.

What's more, the Alliance and Williams blame Shepard for what they are really responsible for despite the bitter irony of such an accusation. Somehow, I doubt that the writers of ME3 have even noticed this. But this is why Ashley's words on Horizon sounded hollow in my ears and why she needs to eat a lot of crow before I can forgive her for it.

I wished I'd payed attention to your post before I wrote mine. You've made me doubt everything the Alliance and Ashley stand for, with good reason. Good job sir/madam!:lol::D

#282
Iakus

Iakus
  • Members
  • 30 316 messages

Casterdael wrote...

What strickens me as odd is that everyone blames Ashley for the debacle at Horizon. It was just basically Shepard who treated her as someone who he barely knew but talked to her because he was socially obliged to it. A huge lack of tact on Shepard's side. No wonder she exploded in his face.


I don't blame Ashley.  I put the blame squarely on the shoulders of those responsible.

The writers.

#283
whywhywhywhy

whywhywhywhy
  • Members
  • 697 messages
That's a acceptable reason for Ashley still to be your girl.

edit:
It's funny you posted that I was just thinking about it.  How they alienated both Liara and Ash from the player only to give him three new LI to pursue.  Then they kind of fixed it with LOTSB for Liara not entirely but better.  So that got me to thinking they were going to try to fix ash by giving her a "I'm looking out for you by freeing you from prison and I'm so hot now you have to forgive me way." in me3 or release a new DLC dedicated to VS.

Modifié par whywhywhywhy, 21 juillet 2011 - 03:00 .


#284
knightnblu

knightnblu
  • Members
  • 1 731 messages
whywhywhywhy - Sorry for stealing your thunder :-)

jreezy - No worries my friend, thanks for the kind words and the support!

iacus - God knows that I would love to blame the writers for this debacle, but characters are who they are written to be. For good or ill, you have to respond to them as they are written or you lose immersion. So, I do blame Ashley for her behavior. She was Shep's LI, she had been intimate with him, she claimed to love him, and on Horizon she lost her mind. She doesn't even ask him for a full explanation.

I have often thought that character romances in games were written by geeks who never dated a girl until they were 30 or so, judging by the dialog that was written for the characters. In fact, some of the dialog in ME1 was almost painful, though the context was warm. As a result, I have always believed that such dialog should be read by an actual woman or two to see what they thought about it and if they look at you funny, start over and take any suggestions that they make to heart.

Now we have the situation with Arrival and if Ashley thought Shepard had gone dark side for working with Cerberus, she is going to freak when she finds out about the body count of the victims of that episode in ME3. Can't imagine how the writers are going to handle that one, but they painted themselves into a corner as I see it.

Of course, they could always take the stand that Ashley was never interested in Shepard to begin with and confused lust with love. That would solve the problem of her meltdown, but it would certainly infuriate the people who like her and wish to maintain her as a LI. Any way you slice it, the writers have their work cut out for them and they have created a mine field for themselves.

As for Liara's romance in ME2, that was way better than what happened to poor Ahsley.

#285
Iakus

Iakus
  • Members
  • 30 316 messages

knightnblu wrote...

iacus - God knows that I would love to blame the writers for this debacle, but characters are who they are written to be. For good or ill, you have to respond to them as they are written or you lose immersion. So, I do blame Ashley for her behavior. She was Shep's LI, she had been intimate with him, she claimed to love him, and on Horizon she lost her mind. She doesn't even ask him for a full explanation.

I have often thought that character romances in games were written by geeks who never dated a girl until they were 30 or so, judging by the dialog that was written for the characters. In fact, some of the dialog in ME1 was almost painful, though the context was warm. As a result, I have always believed that such dialog should be read by an actual woman or two to see what they thought about it and if they look at you funny, start over and take any suggestions that they make to heart.

Now we have the situation with Arrival and if Ashley thought Shepard had gone dark side for working with Cerberus, she is going to freak when she finds out about the body count of the victims of that episode in ME3. Can't imagine how the writers are going to handle that one, but they painted themselves into a corner as I see it.

Of course, they could always take the stand that Ashley was never interested in Shepard to begin with and confused lust with love. That would solve the problem of her meltdown, but it would certainly infuriate the people who like her and wish to maintain her as a LI. Any way you slice it, the writers have their work cut out for them and they have created a mine field for themselves.

As for Liara's romance in ME2, that was way better than what happened to poor Ahsley.


I can and do put the blame on the writers.

Ashley was my favorite character in ME1, and Kaidan was my second favorite.  VIrmire to this day gives me a twinge because I can only save one (usually Ash)  That is the Ash and Kaidan I remember.  Two minutes on Horizon can't wash that away.  It just makes me want to play ME1 again.

Ah, Horizon, which has both of them acting totally out of character.  It is in fact shoddy writing and I hope the Bioware developers feels bad about it and have resolved to do better this time.  I'm hoping that they will go through great pains to have this blemish on the ME franchise be addressed and resolved in a mature and thoughtful manner so the story can move on.

I'm hoping that the VS doesn't get further mangled, making it abundantly clear that choosing him/her as the LI is the "wrong" answer.  My saying throughout ME2's time:  "I will not forget Ash, even if Bioware has"

And yes, I do find it odd that Liara, despite her original cold, obsessive demeanor in ME2, gets a DLC that "rehabilitates" her and lets the player continue a romance, or make a clean break.  We also have six LIs in ME2 whom Shepard is presumably still on good terms with in ME3.  Yet Ash/Kaidan it looks like we have to "win back" and deal with unresolved issues, like allegations of treason.  What's up with that?

Modifié par iakus, 21 juillet 2011 - 08:17 .


#286
ShepardsIdol

ShepardsIdol
  • Members
  • 68 messages
Ash is still mine. She isnt a bigot and it was definitely my fault for her explosion. "Ash Its been too long" after 2 years probably wasnt the best move on my part.

#287
knightnblu

knightnblu
  • Members
  • 1 731 messages
iacus said, "We also have six LIs in ME2 whom Shepard is presumably still on good terms with in ME3. Yet Ash/Kaidan it looks like we have to "win back" and deal with unresolved issues, like allegations of treason. What's up with that?"

I can tell you what's up with that, it was unintended consequences. I am convinced that BioWare never intended for there to be a huge gulf between Shepard and the VS. They just wanted to open the possibility of having a romance in ME2 without interference from ME1. So they had the VS break a little crappy with you in order to irritate you enough that you wouldn't feel like a heel if you got busy with another person in ME2 if the VS was an LI and/or to feel more isolated and more prone to accept Cerberus as a partner.

That schism was supposed to be a minor one and meant to cured by the later semi-sincere and tepid apology she sent. The player was supposed to go, "Oh pure, sweet Ashley. She has suffered so much. I can't wait to see her two years down the road!" and go on about his business. For some folks it was a smashing success, for others...not so much.

Liara was...different in ME2, but came around to a satisfactory conclusion for her player LI. Williams on the other hand created a wide chasm for some players and added insult to injury with her traitor comment after she and the Alliance sold you out to Cerberus in the first place because it was too much trouble to look for your body or to secure classified Alliance technology. Not only that, but that she would so casually dispose of someone that she claimed to love is unfathomable to me.

My solution for all of this? GTFOMS or the writers can fix it. At this point in the game, I really don't care which option they go with as long as I can get one of them.

#288
ubermensch007

ubermensch007
  • Members
  • 760 messages

knightnblu wrote...Also, if she didn't believe Shepard why should she believe Anderson? How does Anderson know what Shepard is all about? He hasn't seen him in two years, just like Ashley. Unless that's who she is intimate with and who she now trusts while she clearly no longer trusts Shepard. Now that
would be an interesting happenstance for ME3. Shepard's mentor being Ashley's new paramour would go a long ways toward explaining her meltdown on Horizon. His personality is much like Shepard's, he is free
according to Shadow Broker files, he brought her aboard the Normandy when Shepard was disabled by the comm relay, and he has a reputation as a top notch soldier. A perfect man for Ashley since Shepard has gone to
his grave, so to speak.
 
That love triangle would lend some interesting choices to the characters in ME3 and perhaps that is the
other shoe that we are waiting to hear hit the floor. How does Shepard proceed? Does he strive to win her back from the man who was his mentor? What does Ashley feel? Is she torn between a past with the man who made
her feel worth what she was striving to achieve or the man who repaired the hole in her heart and gave her a path to move forward on? Against the backdrop of the galaxy on fire, that is some good material for
people to navigate in my opinion and it would set up some powerful tensions between the characters with options for both paragons and renegades.

 
As improbable and unlikely as Wiiliams and Anderson being romantically involved may seem to most.Knight, I think that you might be right. :P

Casterdael wrote...What strikes me as odd is that everyone blames Ashley for the debacle
at Horizon. It was just basically Shepard who treated her as someone who he barely knew but talked to her because he was socially obliged to it.A huge lack of tact on Shepard's side. No wonder she exploded in his
face.

Yeah so Knight, is this the sort of person that my Shepard should trust to be a member of the jury in his trial?! :pinched:

Casterdael, Shepard is not the one to blame for the fiasco on Horizon; Admiral Anderson is...After recieving Anderson's email my Commander Shepard made a b-line to the Citadel.To find out what's what and especially to know how Ashley is doing and where is she.But for some reason or 'other' Anderson stonewalls Shepard.He doesn't even give Williams a heads up, that the Council has reinstated Shepard's Spectre staus.

And now I'm starting to wonder, was Anderson stonewalling Shepard :? or ****-blocking Shepard? <_<
STONEWALL (verb)

  The verb STONEWALL has 2 senses:
1. obstruct or hinder any discussion

2. engage in delaying tactics or refuse to cooperate

****BLOCKER
A person who deliberately or inadvertently makes impossible another's
intended goal of sexual intercourse; Something designed to prevent one
from achieving a goal

Yeah...Admiral Anderson may be guilty of both offenses. :police: And did you notice in the 
E3 Mass Effect 3 Demo when the Admiral talks to the Lieutenant, she doesn't even ask if the Commander is okay.:unsure:

Modifié par ubermensch007, 22 juillet 2011 - 04:15 .


#289
ebevan91

ebevan91
  • Members
  • 1 511 messages
Yes. I never fancied the human-asari or human-quarian romances.

So Ashley's still my girl, or woman. Whatever.

#290
The Real Bowser

The Real Bowser
  • Members
  • 703 messages
I like Tali more than Ash, but Ashley is still my infiltrator's love interest, and that's not changing. Ever.

#291
Kane Corr

Kane Corr
  • Members
  • 63 messages
Romance in Mass 1 = Ash

Romance in Mass 2 = Miranda

Justified? Yeah. Ash and I were def broken up. HOWEVER....Mass Effect 3 is a whole nother story.

Things will be interesting.

#292
Guest_Catch This Fade_*

Guest_Catch This Fade_*
  • Guests

ubermensch007 wrote...

knightnblu wrote...Also, if she didn't believe Shepard why should she believe Anderson? How does Anderson know what Shepard is all about? He hasn't seen him in two years, just like Ashley. Unless that's who she is intimate with and who she now trusts while she clearly no longer trusts Shepard. Now that
would be an interesting happenstance for ME3. Shepard's mentor being Ashley's new paramour would go a long ways toward explaining her meltdown on Horizon. His personality is much like Shepard's, he is free
according to Shadow Broker files, he brought her aboard the Normandy when Shepard was disabled by the comm relay, and he has a reputation as a top notch soldier. A perfect man for Ashley since Shepard has gone to
his grave, so to speak.
 
That love triangle would lend some interesting choices to the characters in ME3 and perhaps that is the
other shoe that we are waiting to hear hit the floor. How does Shepard proceed? Does he strive to win her back from the man who was his mentor? What does Ashley feel? Is she torn between a past with the man who made
her feel worth what she was striving to achieve or the man who repaired the hole in her heart and gave her a path to move forward on? Against the backdrop of the galaxy on fire, that is some good material for
people to navigate in my opinion and it would set up some powerful tensions between the characters with options for both paragons and renegades.

 
As improbable and unlikely as Wiiliams and Anderson being romantically involved may seem to most.Knight, I think that you might be right. :P

Casterdael wrote...What strikes me as odd is that everyone blames Ashley for the debacle
at Horizon. It was just basically Shepard who treated her as someone who he barely knew but talked to her because he was socially obliged to it.A huge lack of tact on Shepard's side. No wonder she exploded in his
face.

Yeah so Knight, is this the sort of person that my Shepard should trust to be a member of the jury in his trial?! :pinched:

Casterdael, Shepard is not the one to blame for the fiasco on Horizon; Admiral Anderson is...After recieving Anderson's email my Commander Shepard made a b-line to the Citadel.To find out what's what and especially to know how Ashley is doing and where is she.But for some reason or 'other' Anderson stonewalls Shepard.He doesn't even give Williams a heads up, that the Council has reinstated Shepard's Spectre staus.

And now I'm starting to wonder, was Anderson stonewalling Shepard :? or ****-blocking Shepard? <_<
STONEWALL (verb)

  The verb STONEWALL has 2 senses:
1. obstruct or hinder any discussion

2. engage in delaying tactics or refuse to cooperate

****BLOCKER
A person who deliberately or inadvertently makes impossible another's
intended goal of sexual intercourse; Something designed to prevent one
from achieving a goal

Yeah...Admiral Anderson may be guilty of both offenses. :police: And did you notice in the 
E3 Mass Effect 3 Demo when the Admiral talks to the Lieutenant, she doesn't even ask if the Commander is okay.:unsure:

I was watching that demo and something unrelated to Ashley or relationships in general has me worried. The speaker was talking about how they beefed up enemy A.I. so they could control the battlefield better. I sincerely hope that BioWare also found ways to make the squad A.I. better. Playing Mass Effect 2 on Insanity made me realize how useless my squad members are most of the time. On a related note: I loathe Ashley so much right now because of her accusations on Horizon.

Modifié par jreezy, 22 juillet 2011 - 05:51 .


#293
knightnblu

knightnblu
  • Members
  • 1 731 messages
You know, I hate to say it, but Ashley does seem like a gold digger doesn't she? On the one hand, she acknowledges that is it wrong for personnel to date members of their own unit because of "complications" in a letter to her sister, but then she nearly stalks Shepard in ME. Kind of reminds me of some of those ladies that go after Hollywood stars looking to cash in.

She links herself to him romantically with suggestions so obvious that a neon sign would be less blatant, but how far does her loyalty go? She claims to have mourned Shepard and read a lot of Tennyson, but I didn't see any of it. Her association with Shepard seems to have paid off though.

She's no longer blacklisted by the Alliance military. Her career is now on the upswing, she's famous and well known as a hero, and she's now her own woman. What does she need Shepard for? He can't do anything for her anymore because he's dead, but maybe humanity's first Councilor can. Hooking up with Anderson gives her access to the Alliance brass, access to the Council, and the prestige of being with humanity's first galactic politician as she rubs shoulders with the high and mighty of the galaxy at social events on Anderson's arm. Good times.

Now you're probably saying, Anderson wouldn't do that and if Shepard were alive I would agree with you. However, Anderson is alone and Williams is a young, good looking woman with a nice figure. There are benefits. Combined with the fact of Shepard having gone to the great beyond, who would Anderson be hurting?

After Ashley's not so warm welcome on Horizon, it may not be as far fetched as you think. True, she did apologize for her behavior, but her mea culpa was a bit light on the "culpa" and such tepid apologies makes one wonder about the sincerity of the person apologizing, particularly in the face of such grave insults to your character.

Maybe that's why Williams went from zero to b!tch in .25 seconds on Horizon. You show up fresh from being dead right in time to ruin her relationship with her sugar daddy and throw a monkey wrench into her plans for the future. Because if you are working for a terrorist group with the rumors swirling around you in governments across Council space, her former association with you would be her undoing as she is convicted for guilt by association. She has been there before with dear ol' granddad and doesn't want to go there again.

Is there any proof for any of this? Nope. Not one shred of evidence exists aside from Ashley's behavior. But it does a pretty good job at explaining her reaction on Horizon and gives a credible basis for her motivations. Looking at Ashley's behavior in this light, one can understand her. Absent a reasonable explanation, her behavior indicates something deeper is going on, but the player is not told what. That makes me suspicious that something like this is coming in ME3. That is why I argue that if you want her, you will have to work for it.

#294
Guest_laecraft_*

Guest_laecraft_*
  • Guests
Yeah, I remember when TIM told Liara, "I don't expect you to understand our customs, but Shepard's important to humanity, and we want his body back in human hands - even if it's impossible to restore him," and I remember thinking, wow, TIM's more noble than the Alliance.

And then, when Shepard's body is recaptured, Liara says, "Maybe I don't understand your customs, but won't it be better to let the dead rest?" and Cerberus just refuses to give up. I lost all sympathy for Liara at that moment, too. She wanted Shepard to remain dead. The Alliance wanted Shepard to rot. But Cerberus never gave up on Shepard. They were the only ones who never betrayed me - they give me hope that humanity's worth fighting for them.

When you draw conclusions about Ashley, don't forget that she's got a twin - Kaidan. Try to apply your conclusions to him, since he behaves in the exact way she does. Would you call him a gold digger, as well?

Also, Anderson's in love with Kahlee Sanders. She's his new close associate, who took Shepard's place as Anderson's comrade in arms when he goes to hunt for Cerberus - just like old times. I just thought I'd point it out.

#295
Iakus

Iakus
  • Members
  • 30 316 messages

knightnblu wrote...

She links herself to him romantically with suggestions so obvious that a neon sign would be less blatant, but how far does her loyalty go? She claims to have mourned Shepard and read a lot of Tennyson, but I didn't see any of it. Her association with Shepard seems to have paid off though.


To be honest, Shep does that too.  In fact, SHep starts it "And if I ordered you to kiss anyone?"

But they never directly act on it until they are already fugitives from the Alliance and likely off on a "Suicide Mission"

She's no longer blacklisted by the Alliance military. Her career is now on the upswing, she's famous and well known as a hero, and she's now her own woman. What does she need Shepard for? He can't do anything for her anymore because he's dead, but maybe humanity's first Councilor can. Hooking up with Anderson gives her access to the Alliance brass, access to the Council, and the prestige of being with humanity's first galactic politician as she rubs shoulders with the high and mighty of the galaxy at social events on Anderson's arm. Good times.


I'm pretty sure the WIliams family name got off the blacklist by her being instrumental in stopping Saren and saving the CItadel from a geth attack, not by her sleeping her way to the top.

''Look at who I am Shepard, do you ever hear me ask for help? It's not that bad things dont happen to me, if you stay with me long enough, maybe I will tell you about some of them them. But I deal with them myself. I dont need a shoulder to cry on, a knight  to rescue me, or a man to make me happy, this is who i am....i like her and you better like her too''

Now you're probably saying, Anderson wouldn't do that and if Shepard were alive I would agree with you. However, Anderson is alone and Williams is a young, good looking woman with a nice figure. There are benefits. Combined with the fact of Shepard having gone to the great beyond, who would Anderson be hurting?


Kahlee Sanders?  Pus all this presupposes Shepard and Ash are LIs

After Ashley's not so warm welcome on Horizon, it may not be as far fetched as you think. True, she did apologize for her behavior, but her mea culpa was a bit light on the "culpa" and such tepid apologies makes one wonder about the sincerity of the person apologizing, particularly in the face of such grave insults to your character.


I suspect that Ash's mea maxima culpa was the result of someone at the last minute noting "Hey, this dialogue seems a bit harsh, maybe we should toss something in there to hold people off til the next game.  What do you mean all the lines are locked in.  Quick someone write something down for an email and see if we can slip it in under the deadline!"

Is there any proof for any of this? Nope. Not one shred of evidence exists aside from Ashley's behavior. But it does a pretty good job at explaining her reaction on Horizon and gives a credible basis for her motivations. Looking at Ashley's behavior in this light, one can understand her. Absent a reasonable explanation, her behavior indicates something deeper is going on, but the player is not told what. That makes me suspicious that something like this is coming in ME3. That is why I argue that if you want her, you will have to work for it.


Sure it's great proof.  Except for everything that happened in ME1 ;)

The only part I agree on is the bolded part.  But I do not believe that it's anything sinister.  Ash and Kaidan are opposites in many ways, but both are highly honorable Alliance  soldiers.  They also know abut the Reapers.  No way they would endanger their own people or the galaxy in general by trying to screw over the one person actively trying to stop the coming invasion.  

Modifié par iakus, 22 juillet 2011 - 05:27 .


#296
knightnblu

knightnblu
  • Members
  • 1 731 messages
iacus said, "Ash and Kaidan are opposites in many ways, but both are highly honorable Alliance soldiers. They also know abut the Reapers. No way they would endanger their own people or the galaxy in general by trying to screw over the one person actively trying to stop the coming invasion."

Hmmmm...I am not so sure. Would an honorable comrade that professes deep feelings for you call you a traitor without the benefit of all of the facts? After all, honorable implies that a person is also fair minded. Ashley also claims that she is Alliance through and through, but when the Alliance failed to make the attempt to recover your body and the twenty bodies of the missing crewmen, Ashley abandoned them and Shepard as well. Was she in a position to do something about it? I really don't know, but it is specifically that failure which insures that Shepard's corpse is handed over to Cerberus. However, I will agree that Ashley is totally unaware of how Shepard ended up in Cerberus and cannot be held responsible for that.

When Shepard told Williams on Horizon that the Collectors were responsible for the abductions of colonists and that he suspected that they were working for the Reapers, she just brushed him off and asked him how did he know that Cerberus wasn't behind it? It is at this point that Ashley's words and actions indicates that she no longer trusts Shepard or anything that he says. How do you work with somebody like that?

If Williams no longer trusts Shepard on Horizon, can you imagine what she is going to do when she finds out the results of Arrival? Ashley is waiting and expecting Shepard to knife her, the Alliance, and Anderson in the back. Does that mean that she trusts him to deal with the Reapers? I don't know, but I don't think that we can count on her just following orders anymore. She's going to question, probe, and analyze each and every decision, order, and policy that you make specifically because she has to watch the traitor.

The writers created a gulf between Shepard and Williams. There are a number of ways that it could have been handled differently, but I am thinking that they have some objective in mind for ME3. Whether it is Ashley's new romance that's going to be a problem, trust issues with the treasonous Shepard, or whatever it is that they have cooked up, I think that anybody who expects to pick up Ashley's romance as if nothing ever happened is in for a big surprise.

#297
rapscallioness

rapscallioness
  • Members
  • 8 039 messages
Well, I don't think the VS believed Shep was "resurrected" by Cerberus. And it's alot to believe. When Shep said it all the LI heard was Cerberus. No response to the outrageous, yet true, statement that indeed Shep was dead the past 2 years. No.."what do you mean, resurrected?" Just straight ot "you're w/ Cerberus?"

So, if the LI doesn't really believe you were dead after all, then it looks like Shep went off w/ Cerberus from the get go. That's the key, the belief or disbelief about Shep being brought back from the dead. The LI doesn't believe that crap..and I can't blame them. Although it still stung to be called a traitor and liar by the main one I was trolling around to find.

#298
Iakus

Iakus
  • Members
  • 30 316 messages

knightnblu wrote...

iacus said, "Ash and Kaidan are opposites in many ways, but both are highly honorable Alliance soldiers. They also know abut the Reapers. No way they would endanger their own people or the galaxy in general by trying to screw over the one person actively trying to stop the coming invasion."

Hmmmm...I am not so sure. Would an honorable comrade that professes deep feelings for you call you a traitor without the benefit of all of the facts? After all, honorable implies that a person is also fair minded. Ashley also claims that she is Alliance through and through, but when the Alliance failed to make the attempt to recover your body and the twenty bodies of the missing crewmen, Ashley abandoned them and Shepard as well. Was she in a position to do something about it? I really don't know, but it is specifically that failure which insures that Shepard's corpse is handed over to Cerberus. However, I will agree that Ashley is totally unaware of how Shepard ended up in Cerberus and cannot be held responsible for that.

When Shepard told Williams on Horizon that the Collectors were responsible for the abductions of colonists and that he suspected that they were working for the Reapers, she just brushed him off and asked him how did he know that Cerberus wasn't behind it? It is at this point that Ashley's words and actions indicates that she no longer trusts Shepard or anything that he says. How do you work with somebody like that?

If Williams no longer trusts Shepard on Horizon, can you imagine what she is going to do when she finds out the results of Arrival? Ashley is waiting and expecting Shepard to knife her, the Alliance, and Anderson in the back. Does that mean that she trusts him to deal with the Reapers? I don't know, but I don't think that we can count on her just following orders anymore. She's going to question, probe, and analyze each and every decision, order, and policy that you make specifically because she has to watch the traitor.

The writers created a gulf between Shepard and Williams. There are a number of ways that it could have been handled differently, but I am thinking that they have some objective in mind for ME3. Whether it is Ashley's new romance that's going to be a problem, trust issues with the treasonous Shepard, or whatever it is that they have cooked up, I think that anybody who expects to pick up Ashley's romance as if nothing ever happened is in for a big surprise.


RE:  Alliance recovering body and Normandy crew.  Indeed, it is odd isn't it?  WOuld it make more sense to find out why, or to assume the worst, without all the facts?  I want more facts before I judge Ashley.  Her anger may have a reason behind it.  OR maybe not, but I intend to find out.

RE:  Cerberus behind it all?  To tell the truth, until Shepard saw husks on Horizon, there was no evidence that the Reapers were involved in this at all, just The Illusive Man's word.   I found it stranger that Shepard took this at face value than Ash voicing her suspicion

Yes Arrival's gonna make things interesting for all Shepards, not just the ones who romances Ash/Kaidan.  But I think Arrival would have made fro a better rift between the two than Horizon.  Much better reason to think Shep's gone crazy.

#299
Made Nightwing

Made Nightwing
  • Members
  • 2 080 messages
@knightblu

Okay...you are now officially in speculation territory. As you have stated, there is not one scrap of proof to confirm your opinion, except that it could be possible. @why has spent a considerable amount of time and energy trashing my posts that do the same thing. So...pot? Meet kettle.

I seriously don't get this forum sometimes.

#300
knightnblu

knightnblu
  • Members
  • 1 731 messages

rapscallioness wrote...
 
Well, I don't think the VS believed Shep was "resurrected" by Cerberus. And it's alot to believe. When Shep said it all the LI heard was Cerberus. No response to the outrageous, yet true, statement that indeed Shep was dead the past 2 years. No.."what do you mean, resurrected?" Just straight ot "you're w/ Cerberus?"
 
So, if the LI doesn't really believe you were dead after all, then it looks like Shep went off w/ Cerberus from the get go. That's the key, the belief or disbelief about Shep being brought back from the dead. The LI doesn't believe that crap..and I can't blame them. Although it still stung to be called a traitor and liar by the main one I was trolling around to find.

 
I will grant you that the resurrection is a bit hard to digest. From a medical perspective, there is a hell of a lot of damage to repair. Ice crystals destroy cellular structure, major bones shattered indicating massive trauma to the body, internal organs shredded by concussive forces and ice formation, water vapor boiled out of blood, I can't even imagine it all and to cap it all off, they would not only have to rebuild the primary biological systems, but would have to re-initiate the organic processes within those systems before degradation occurred. Plus the 4 billion credit price tag seems a bit...low.
 
So if Ashley found this hard to believe, I don't blame her. However, if Shepard never lied to her before to compromise his integrity, why should she disbelieve him on Horizon? I don't think that she would unless she no longer trusts him because she would rather believe the rumors about him than to believe the man she claims to have loved and who never lied to her before. In short, Shepard's death may be a hard sell, but to buy the rumors over the man's word just doesn't make any sense unless there is something else going on behind the scenes.
 
iacus - I agree with you, but after Freedom's Progress how could Shepard allow more colonists to vanish? He knew that something bad was going on and that the Collectors were definitely a human enemy and that the Council and the Alliance were doing little or nothing about it. Shepard even asks TIM about the Reaper connection, but TIM just tells him that it is there buried in the data.
 
I can't really see a valid reason for Williams' anger, other than one of the scenarios I have posted on this thread. Something that would set up a cognitive dissonance within her own mind and would be strong enough to force her mind from reason. That means that the emotions generated from such a dissonance would have to be powerful. So whatever it is eating Ashley, has got to be huge. This could include a 15 month old toddler fathered by Shepard for LI's, or perhaps she is indoctrinated and merely doing what the Reapers tell her to do. Either that or she really is bonkers. I am hoping that the ones responsible for creating her storyline recognize this and account for it.
 
 

Made Nightwing wrote...
 
@knightblu
 
Okay...you are now officially in speculation territory. As you have stated, there is not one scrap of proof to confirm your opinion, except that it could be possible. @why has spent a considerable amount of time and energy trashing my posts that do the same thing. So...pot? Meet kettle.
 
I seriously don't get this forum sometimes.

 
The gold digger post was intended to make the point that something big was going on with Ashley and that is why she weirded out on Horizon. That is also why I also acknowledged that it was speculation within the same post. However, speculation can reveal some interesting things when it is combined with deductive reasoning.
 
Let's take TIM for example. We know for a fact that he is covert, not above using others for nefarious purposes and has no problem with sacrificing children for the greater good (On Pragia, the staff stated in communications that there would be hell to pay if TIM discovered what they were doing with children. It was also stated that he would be OK with it if they succeeded. The events regarding Dr. Archer's brother confirm that success is far more important than dead and tortured children to TIM), is manipulative, and has contacts in most governments, the Alliance, and in the criminal world. Further, we know that he lured the Collectors to Horizon because he baited a trap with Ashley Williams.
 
So, what can we infer from this? That rumors started by TIM isolated Shepard from his routine contacts and friends. That the rumors also scared the hell out of Williams because they explicitly stated that Shepard was working for Cerberus. Therefore, we have a burning desire created in Ashley to find out if the rumors are in fact, true. This could then become a motivation for her to inject herself into Cerberus investigation with the intent of finding out.
 
TIM would have been aware of the Alliance's attempt to arm colonists against an unknown enemy by installing defenses at outlying colonies. TIM insured that Horizon would be one such colony where such defenses were installed and also insured that Williams would be there to oversee the installation and to investigate Cerberus activity in the region. He leaked the fact that she was there to the Collectors because he wanted to solidify Shepard's resolve (to save Ashley and the colonists) and to see how fast the Collectors would take the bait. Ashley's fate is irrelevant to TIM's larger schemes though I suspect that he would rather she went with the Collectors aboard their vessel in order to give Shepard added incentive to tear into them.
 
TIM knew that he also would have to disable the defense turrets on Horizon in order to allow the Collectors to approach. He did this for a couple of reasons. First, he needed to know how effective Shepard would be when matched against the Collectors. Secondly, he needed to acquire proof regarding the Reaper connection. Third, he needed to know if Mordin had in fact succeeded in creating a method of avoiding the detection of the Reaper swarms.
 
The losses of colonists, Alliance personnel, and even Shepard himself were all acceptable losses to him. To these ends he would have had an agent on Horizon with whom he could coordinate these things and to monitor Williams. We will likely never know who that agent was, but I suspect that Delann was used as an unwitting pawn in the Cerberus mission. All that would need to happen is for the Cerberus agent to press his Alliance buttons and Williams would be made to look like an idiot because she couldn't figure out the targeting malfunction. I say that Delann did this for two reasons. First, he never recognized that the colony was in any danger so he would have no qualms about toying with the defenses. Secondly, he would have viewed Ashley's frustrations as a means of needling the Alliance and as a private joke. The benefit to the Cerberus operative would have been that he would have had a cut out between himself and his objective of disabling the Colony defenses. Any heat that gets placed on Delann for fooling with the defense turrets gives him a warning and he runs or takes matters into his own hands, but he has a heads up either way.
 
About 80 percent of what is written above is speculation. But, if the premises are true then any extension of that premise is also likely to be true. Is it certain that DeLann disabled the defense turrets? No, but it is probable based upon the established premises on TIM's method of operating. He's covert, he manipulates and sacrifices others, he uses agents to work his will in the galaxy, and most importantly he has already admitted to luring the Collectors to Horizon by using Williams as bait. Like a line of dominoes falling one after the other, the scenario fits. Confidence can be high as to the likelihood of the assertions.
 
This is not true of the "Ashley is a gold digger" scenario and frankly, I never intended it to be. Hopefully, this helps you out.Image IPB