alperez - No apology is necessary, but I thank you anyway for your consideration. Allow me to say that your arguments have softened my stance toward Williams' character somewhat, but I still hold that she could have had more faith, rather than to have abandoned Shepard.
Had our positions been reversed, I would have. I once faced a similar situation as Williams in RL. There was a friend that I served with who's character I was certain of because we had known and served with each other for many years. The situation was nowhere near as extreme as what was presented on Horizon, just similar in context.
Criminal charges were being considered against him for his perceived errors, but I knew that he was innocent. I didn't have any evidence to the contrary and what miniscule evidence there was pointed to him, but the source was questionable. The brass decided that he had to go, if only to preserve appearances. I stood by that man and staked my career on what I knew in my gut. I was proven right. My friend's near miss shook him and he took early retirement.
Would I had done that if I had only a vague idea of that man's character? No way in hell, but such conviction only comes from a sure knowledge of a person's character. I had seen that man in times of severe stress and in good times as well and his character had never wavered. He relocated and we have drifted apart over the years, but if I met him again tomorrow, I would know his character still and it has been many years since last we met.
Am I wrong to overlay my experience on Williams? Frankly, I don't know. Perhaps I am atypical, but there are damned few people outside of my family that I have said that I loved. To me, love implies a bond that is stronger than steel. But folks use that word casually today without its intended commitment. A commitment that engenders a profound trust between two people. A trust that is nigh indestructible unless one of the two parties breaches it in some way. Again, is it fair to overlay this on Williams?
You know as well as I that the fires of combat can forge mighty bonds between people. You also know that it is those bonds that hold a unit together as they fight side by side on the field of battle and that men do not fight out of love of country, but for the love of their fellows fighting with them. Ashley and Shepard most certainly had that bond. Add in the bond of personal friendship and the trust that blossoms and grows into love and you have a second strong bond. When Shepard and Williams become sexual in an expression of the second bond, you have established a third powerful bond. With each bond comes a high level of trust deepening these connections. That is a potent combination of ties and emotions.
Yet, Williams seems to overcome those bonds so easily. Compare that to Anderson. He was Shepard's CO and friend. While it is certainly true that he does not have the same level of trust in Shepard that he had in ME1, he nevertheless knows Shepard's character and doesn't cut him loose because of it. While one could say that Anderson hedges his bets, I think that the truth is that his position demands that he take precautions until he can verify Shepard's loyalty. That is reasonable.
Where Williams is concerned, she doesn't follow Anderson's path. She abandon's him right there on Horizon and violates the three bonds that she has with him in the process. Why? Because of rumors, allegations, his association with Cerberus, and her perception that Shepard ignored her. But is that reasonable?
I guess that the answer to that is: How well does she really know Shepard? I would surmise that those three bonds make it a near certainty that she knows him better than Anderson. She would know his temperament, his values, his character. Character is a very important word. Admiral Stockdale once said that character isn't taught in the public education system any longer. He made that remark when he was speaking about how his personal character helped him to survive his imprisonment with the Vietnamese during the war as a POW. He had been tortured many times and it was only his character that kept him going.
Many people today discount character and do not seek to develop it, but it has been my experience that most in the military represent the few remaining repositories of it. Oh sure, there are examples of character outside of the military, but they are few and far between. In the service, such people are concentrated because they share the same values and ideals. People deride character as being no longer necessary and unimportant, but it is the only true measure of a man and his heart. Williams should have been on a first name basis with Shepard's character and he with hers. Therefore, it is from that perspective that I speak.
Emotions were swirling in both of them. Anxiety, excitement, anger, and fear were Ashley's contribution. Shepard had his own demons. One almost gets the idea that Shepard has butterflies in his stomach when he first sees her. Didn't turn out the way he expected it would.
The only steadying factor they both held in common was their knowledge and trust of each other. In my mind, Ashley had everything she needed to steady her amongst her flurry of emotions and the doubt provided by half truths, lies, and assumptions. But she didn't listen to her gut. She went with her head and it was that denial of her intuition that breached the common trust.
Here in the West we tend to look at the world as something to be controlled and dominated. It is a very mechanistic view. But intuition, or our gut if you would prefer, also has a powerful place in this world. It often warns us of danger, the veracity of others, and tells us when we are being cheated. All we need to do is to listen to it. Having combat experience, you know exactly what I am talking about. It's that sense that tells you that something isn't right, but you can't quite put your finger on exactly what that something is and that strange feeling ends up saving your life. All combat soldiers have that sense to some extent.
Ashley ignores her gut and focuses solely on her head and her emotions blinding her to the truth. She shuts Shepard and his explanations off and proceeds down a path toward abandonment. It is only when she begins down that path does she call Shepard a traitor. Had Shepard been a renegade, I might be inclined to see it her way. But a paragon Shepard with a full paragon score? It doesn't add up.
I suppose that it would be safe to say that I expected more from her. I never expected her to abandon her duties and join up, I never expected her to not be dubious, but I also never expected her to breach the trust between us either. I half expected her to take Anderson's path, but she fooled me. She went one step further and cut the ties.
In the real world, who cares? It is only a game after all. But in the context of the game, that is huge (at least from a role playing perspective). Why would she take that one, last step? What could prompt her to do that? Because she believed what she knew in her gut to be false. True, her head didn't know anything, but what she perceived. Process all of that out and it spells traitor (assuming of course you ignore certain things as you walk up to Shepard on Horizon, but we'll just chalk that up to emotion).
Anderson didn't feel the need to take it that far because he knew Shepard's character. Williams ignores Shepard's character. Anderson preserves their personal ties, Williams abandons them, Anderson has a great responsibility as the human Councilor, Williams is charged with investigating Cerberus in relation to the missing colonies. The two positions are quite similar factoring out the intimacy between Shepard and Williams.
While you are certainly right that I had to deal with a multitude of "daddy" issues and personal problems before taking out the Collector base, there were two overriding factors. First, I had to have their loyalty. Loyalty equates to trust and trust cements a combat team. Second, the galaxy wasn't of fire.
I will give Williams one chance to fix Horizon, but I won't hold my breath. I have always said that. Trust, once broken is a b!tch to win back. Honestly, I don't think that the writers have it in them. But there are no guarantees that even those who have forgiven her will be able to get her back. Williams is not Liara.