Is (your) Shepard still Alliance?
#151
Guest_laecraft_*
Posté 24 juin 2011 - 05:56
Guest_laecraft_*
at 1:02
#152
Posté 24 juin 2011 - 06:01
But also a freelancing cake decorator.
#153
Posté 24 juin 2011 - 06:07
#154
Posté 24 juin 2011 - 06:10
marshalleck wrote...
Everyone's Shepard is still Alliance. You don't have a choice.
One of the devs said you can RP against the Alliance, so we might yet.
#155
Posté 25 juin 2011 - 01:36
TheMarshal wrote...
They pinned their hopes on Shepard being made a Spectre so that they could advance their position in the galaxy, then let her hang when it was politically expedient to do so.
TheMarshal wrote...
Shepard's likeness was used for
recruitment purposes for the Alliance after she died, right up until the
point where she ceased to be marketable.
Yes, welcome to the real world missy. Nobody appreciates you for what you are. We all have wants. It was you who enlisted and you who needs to work to prove your worth, not the other way around.
TheMarshal wrote...
They were lightning-quick to label her a traitor when Cerberus leaked to them that she was working for them.
Yeah, people who switch loyalties to the avowed enemy of those you used to be with, are generally considered "traitors." It doesn't matter what your intentions are.
And what did they even do about it? Answer: nothing.
The Alliance has every right to be peeved that you're working with Cerberus. It doesn't matter what you're doing, how do you expect them to feel when it turns out that you're alive and working for Cerberus? It makes them look kinda bad that you switched loyalties, and makes their enemy look good. Their enemy has a history of menacing with them, and you know it too. Still, you changed allegiances and are causing them way more problems than they are to you.
TheMarshal wrote...
How do you think Cerberus got the plans for the Normandy?
Cerberus moles in the Alliance.
TheMarshal wrote...
Or figured out that the VS was going to be stationed on Virmire?
Because TIM is an info-broker and so it's his job to know.
TheMarshal wrote...
So the fact that Admiral Hackett sends Shepard on a covert mission that, even if 100% successful, could still result in political fallout with the batarians, but ultimately winds up with Shepard taking the blame for what was effectively an Alliance incursion, and then effectively demands that she turn herself in... Sorry Hackett. I was happy to help you out all those times, and thanks for bringing in the fleet against Sovereign, but I sure as hell won't be wearing my 'dress blues' to that farce of a trial.
--> You chose to go. I know the story "forces" us to, but Shepard had no obligation to do it, but (s)he does. Be mad at Shepard for getting into that mess.
--> It's not an Alliance incursion if you went on your own initiative, as someone who claims to be 'done' with the Alliance.
--> You were the one responsible for what happened and it does no one any good for an Alliance-batarian conflict in the middle of a Reaper war. This is NOT about what the Alliance needs, it's about doing what has to be done.
#156
Posté 25 juin 2011 - 01:46
#157
Posté 25 juin 2011 - 02:32
Also as an aside I think it'd be awesome if Cerberus is splintered into two groups and they are fighting against each other. Reaper slaves (lead by indoctrinated TIM) and a side still true to Cerberus and what it stands for (Lead by Miranda maybe...or even her father! Whoever he is??).
#158
Posté 25 juin 2011 - 02:58
My Shep is not with Alliance any longer. Best way to put it, Alliance declared him dead and let's keep it that way. He will help and/or work with Alliance, but only because their are needed against Reapers. In general, he believes that human are just equal part of galactic community.
My Shep is anti-Cerberus. Only reason he even worked with Cerberus was Reaper threat. But he still did all he could to make Illusive Man's life hell. And destroying Collector base was glorious way to make his resignation. My Shep had earned all the enmity from Cerberus.
All in all my Shep is loyal to only thing, saving the galaxy from the Reapers by hook or by crook.
#159
Posté 26 juin 2011 - 10:33
#160
Posté 26 juin 2011 - 10:36
Maybe some day those loyalties will conflict, but she sees making sure they don't as part of her job.
#161
Posté 26 juin 2011 - 10:39
#162
Guest_LuckyIronAxe_*
Posté 26 juin 2011 - 01:26
Guest_LuckyIronAxe_*
#163
Posté 26 juin 2011 - 01:29
#164
Posté 26 juin 2011 - 06:47
Hah Yes Reapers wrote...
--> You chose to go. I know the story "forces" us to, but Shepard had no obligation to do it, but (s)he does. Be mad at Shepard for getting into that mess.
--> It's not an Alliance incursion if you went on your own initiative, as someone who claims to be 'done' with the Alliance.
--> You were the one responsible for what happened and it does no one any good for an Alliance-batarian conflict in the middle of a Reaper war. This is NOT about what the Alliance needs, it's about doing what has to be done.
I didn't go in of my own initiative. I went in because Dr. Kenson getting captured was probably going to be enough to start a war between the Hegemony and the Alliance. I went in because Hackett asked me to. Dr. Kenson's presence in that system in the first place was part of an Alliance incursion, by the way, so even if I hadn't gone in, there'd still be the potential for war. The wiki about the assignment confirms that.
My point is that they chose Shepard for the operation because they knew that if she failed they could hang the whole thing around her neck and keep their hands clean. Quite the 'thank you' to the person who's essentially responsible for saving the Citadel and getting humanity a seat on the council.
As for the Normandy plans falling into Cerberus hands, how high up the food chain do you think someone would have to be in order to have access to those plans? Captain? Admiral? I'm willing to bet that more than one high-ranking Alliance officer is working for Cerberus, which means that the Alliance is at least partially run by Cerberus, which is another reason not to trust them.
I'll show up for the trial. I'd wait until it became obvious that the Hegemony was going to start a war first, but I'd show up. Hell, I'll take it one further and say that I won't even out the fact that Kenson was in that system on Alliance business, or that the Alliance asked me to go in after her in the first place. Just don't expect me to rep the Alliance while doing so.
Regarding 'for the greater good' in general, there has to be a balance between the self and the greater good. Unless you wanted to be geth, that is. If you give yourself over completely to being controlled by others, sacrificing your individuality for the 'greater good', then you've lost your entire sense of self, and you may as well have rolled over for the Reapers. The problem that I have with the Alliance is the same problem I have with Cerberus (more specifically TIM). They want/expect you to give up everything about yourself for the 'greater good', except that they're not willing to do the same. TIM talks about sacrifices having to be made, and does so while sitting in the comfort and safety of his anonymous position in the galaxy. The Alliance latches onto any rising star to try and advance their own purposes, but when push comes to shove they aren't willing to back up a single one of the people that got them there.
#165
Posté 26 juin 2011 - 07:03
But I think Frodo said it best when some hurts goes too deep and time can't ever seem to heal it.
At this point, I don't care who I'm aligned with. I just want the Reapers gone. Still, Alliance did hurt my Shepard's ego and reputation. There is no way I'll just go happily waltzing to them and accept them with an open heart. Or Cerberus since they were out to kill Shepard....
Oh hells, I'm freelance. ^^
#166
Posté 26 juin 2011 - 07:17
TheMarshal wrote...
I didn't go in of my own initiative. I went in because Dr. Kenson getting captured was probably going to be enough to start a war between the Hegemony and the Alliance. I went in because Hackett asked me to. Dr. Kenson's presence in that system in the first place was part of an Alliance incursion, by the way, so even if I hadn't gone in, there'd still be the potential for war. The wiki about the assignment confirms that.
My point is that they chose Shepard for the operation because they knew that if she failed they could hang the whole thing around her neck and keep their hands clean. Quite the 'thank you' to the person who's essentially responsible for saving the Citadel and getting humanity a seat on the council.
As for the Normandy plans falling into Cerberus hands, how high up the food chain do you think someone would have to be in order to have access to those plans? Captain? Admiral? I'm willing to bet that more than one high-ranking Alliance officer is working for Cerberus, which means that the Alliance is at least partially run by Cerberus, which is another reason not to trust them.
I'll show up for the trial. I'd wait until it became obvious that the Hegemony was going to start a war first, but I'd show up. Hell, I'll take it one further and say that I won't even out the fact that Kenson was in that system on Alliance business, or that the Alliance asked me to go in after her in the first place. Just don't expect me to rep the Alliance while doing so.
Regarding 'for the greater good' in general, there has to be a balance between the self and the greater good. Unless you wanted to be geth, that is. If you give yourself over completely to being controlled by others, sacrificing your individuality for the 'greater good', then you've lost your entire sense of self, and you may as well have rolled over for the Reapers. The problem that I have with the Alliance is the same problem I have with Cerberus (more specifically TIM). They want/expect you to give up everything about yourself for the 'greater good', except that they're not willing to do the same. TIM talks about sacrifices having to be made, and does so while sitting in the comfort and safety of his anonymous position in the galaxy. The Alliance latches onto any rising star to try and advance their own purposes, but when push comes to shove they aren't willing to back up a single one of the people that got them there.
Quoted for truth, justice and the American Way!
I couldn't have put it any better myself. Both groups suck, they can all go **** themselves in my opinion. I demand the ability to form my own army, with blackjack, and hookers!
#167
Guest_f_b_*
Posté 26 juin 2011 - 07:40
Guest_f_b_*
Shep'll stay to promote change: maybe if the Alliance get a kick up the backside from someone who has saved the galaxy twice they'll improve.
Cerberus are racist terrorists in my Shep's opinion, no two ways about it; they're a paragon, and I doubt they could ally with Cerberus in good conscience. They'd trust Cerberus about as far as they could throw them.
Basically, they're sticking with the Alliance because they're the nicer, less pro-human option. But I don't know how long that'll last if politics get in the way.
#168
Posté 26 juin 2011 - 09:21
Modifié par easygame88, 26 juin 2011 - 09:22 .
#169
Posté 26 juin 2011 - 09:33
more of a renegon than anything...
#170
Posté 26 juin 2011 - 09:34
No ! He's for da Horde !Is (your) Shepard still Alliance?
...
Seriously, no. My Shep is a free-lance now.
#171
Posté 26 juin 2011 - 09:50
My Shep (one of them anyways
they don't accuse or judge, although she values their opinions, they follow her and she follows them, like a team
#172
Posté 27 juin 2011 - 11:13
I was really pissed when I kept hearing in ME and ME2 on the news the Alliance taking credit for all my hard work when I spent my time doing all those side quests.
I guess Shepard will always be considered Alliance whether he/she likes it or not. As long as you're useful to them.
#173
Posté 27 juin 2011 - 11:27
#174
Posté 27 juin 2011 - 11:27
Is not sure whether to applaud for top parody points or not.procyon8 wrote...
-snip-
Quoted for truth, justice and the American Way!
#175
Posté 27 juin 2011 - 11:35





Retour en haut







