Cainne Chapel wrote...
CannonLars wrote...
Had-to-say wrote...
CannonLars wrote...
Seems like a petty topic looking at it now lol. But are you into the change in marketing?
Not petty. You like what you like. I think the 4 million people that buy the game are great but they are trying to get more of the market share. They got us now they have to get the other guy. It was a trailer for that guy that doesn't know he likes RPGs.
Personally, I wouldn't compromise the franchise image and fundamentals for the sake of broad appeal and greater commercial success. I know EA strives for that, but I prefer striving to make the great vision and attracting as many people as you can who would appreciate what it really is.
Dropping the sleek rpg appearance to grab a bite of the bigger shooter market wouldn't work for my tastes if I had any say in a project like this. Maybe that purer aspiration isn't on EA/BioWare radar, but it did slightly lower the franchise value when I saw the mentality of getting more shooter and action fans and trailers and then saw that it made its way a little too deep into the game.
Brilliant series of course, but spread beyond itself for the sake of sales in my eyes.
Far be it for an At Profit company to make a game that appeals to Millions of fans eh?
Still dont get how one trailer compromises franchise image or fundamentals as the game has always been a Hybrid RPG/TPS but *shrugs* Maybe i dont read into Marketing that much anymore, seeing as how I was a business Major and most of that stuff blows by me without me even really caring.
Fact of the matter is, any company in business, with employees, will try to deliver the product that will appeal to the most people in its market. Fortunately for Bioware, the ME franchise is a veritable gold mine, so I doubt they'll muck it up for the 3rd entry. Not after all the accolades they garnered for the second one.
But I do beg the question.... whats wrong with better shooter/action elements in a game thats primarly revolved around...combat?
Well to answer you end question, ME1 was considered pretty weak in combat by many compared to its potential, especially critically. It required pauses of action, had framerate issues, and was fleshed out awkwardly in several ways. The story is what the center is, which is why I think shooter and rpg fans have stuck with it. without the heavy story branch focus, many RPGers would leave. That said, I don't think Mass Effect revolves around combat, it revolves around the story that is tying this trilogy together.
Now I am a bit more particular and concerned with many elements of things than many, so while some might say that blue shots from guns in ME1 was minor, I miss it almost every time I play ME2. If the littlest things like that matter to me in an image, than you might be able to catch how deeply the marketing to the world will matter. It is just a franchise I have in my heart and I don't want anything but perfection for it, so for it to get a trailer that looks like it was developed by the same marketing studio who does Call of Duty, it is very sad. I know it can be great anyways, but there is just one more thing added to the list of things that don't quite fit the images it deserves.
EDIT: And as my earlier post indicates, I get the motives of the trailer's target audience, I just don't have to agree that it is very Mass Effect. A song like that should never make it into the game, I personally would never let it near the game's trailer either.
To quote a favorite movie of mine, "The little things... there's nothing bigger, is there?" - Vanilla Sky
Modifié par CannonLars, 21 juin 2011 - 02:12 .





Retour en haut







