I Solved the SS Romance/Retcon Issue
#201
Posté 21 juin 2011 - 07:48
Actually creating a story arc to illustrate change would be very different from trying to change a background retroactively. Creating more story would be fine.
#202
Posté 21 juin 2011 - 07:48
#203
Posté 21 juin 2011 - 07:50
the_one_54321 wrote...
Let's look at it the other way around. What if Liara was originally a lesbian only character? Then, because she was popular with the straight guys they said that now she's until guys too. How would that be taken? Or if Maiden was originally gay and they changed him to straight? Would you still see it as consistent with they story?
There really should be some sort of reference to Juhani here.... but I'm not sure how to work it in. Fill in the blanks yourself, folks.
Um, anyway, yes. If Liara had been lesbian-only (and fanboys were upset by it, WHAT KIND OF CRAZY ALTERNATE REALITY IS THIS?!
And no one is asking for Kaidan to become gay-only.... So your example of "originally gay and changed to straight" doesn't really have a plac ein this argument.... But if someone was asking for that, I'd tell him or her to knock it off, because femSheps who romanced Kaidan in ME1 and ME2 shoudln't have to lose him.
ANYWAY, YES, I will maintain my theory that sexualities can and do change throughout a story and remain consistent to the continuity! If Bioware makes Kaidan or Ash or anyone bisexual even though they previously wer enot, I have great faith that they will find a way to implement it with extreme respect for the original continuity.
#204
Posté 21 juin 2011 - 07:52
True Zarken wrote...
Again if no one saw my original edit to my post above I apologize for my wording as it was very poor of me and I am suffering from fatigue and sleepless nights so I apologize. However it is no excuse for my poor choice in words so again I apologize.
Hey, no worries. You realized your mistake and you didn't intend to offend anyone. <3
#205
Guest_Fiddles_stix_*
Posté 21 juin 2011 - 07:52
Guest_Fiddles_stix_*
True Zarken wrote...
I completely understand if you take issue with people declaring it a horrible retcon. As it is a way of life for some and for something to be declared horrible when it is your personal prefrence when it comes to life would hurt a persons feelings. Also with people declaring this as "appeasing the crazed fangirls" who "take it too far." I would take issue with that as well as people are generalising horribly there. But a lot of individuals who post on here don't take into account another persons feelings or beliefs when they post on here.
When I look back at this thread and many others that have been created since the announcement of Bi love interests most of the people that don't approve are more worried about the Mass Effect 2 love interests more than anything. So turning Mass Effect 1 love interets Ash and Kaidan and adding new Bi love interests to Mass Effect 3 while leaving Mass Effect 2 love interests alone seems like the best possible out come right now. While also leaving a diverse pool of Bi love interests for Shepard when people enter Mass Effect 3
EDIT 1: I apologize for my wording as it was very poor of me and I am suffering from fatigue and sleepless nights so I apologize. However it is no excuse for my wording so again I apologize.
EDIT 2: I realise that a compromise shouldn't be needed. However many people on these forums don't like the idea of Bi love interests, because many people don't like retcons and/or are still living in the old ways so you can't blame them for that. So the only way to get what everyone wants is a compromise.
You're a good egg.
I appreciate your post and BioWare are probably taking the middle ground and will have new LIs for s/s content.
On my part if I'm snarky it's because everyday I live with a projection of what I should be. I can only see how I'm not that concept so when encountering words that suggest what I am is in some way deformed, unnatural or simply not normal or how it should be. It grates and I feel like I need to comment on it. I realise that's not your intent though and I appreciate that. I can relate to too many late nights affecting phrasing it's exam time where I am. And hey you know why it bothers people and that is certainly something.
#206
Posté 21 juin 2011 - 07:53
If a character was gay and changed into straight or straight and changed into gay (GAY, not bi), then it would be a retcon since it would contradict previous attraction. Heterosexuality and homosexuality are exclusive. However if some character reveals he/she is bi (and not only gay/straight), then it doesn't change anything. He/she is still attracted to "my Shep". Of course there's also the issue of first declaration. If Liara declared she doesn't like men at all in ME1 and then said she does in ME2, that would also be a retcon. But if she didn't say anything, then it was only my assumption what was her stance on romancing the other gender and if she ever did it or would do it.the_one_54321 wrote...
Let's look at it the other way around. What if Liara was originally a lesbian only character? Then, because she was popular with the straight guys they said that now she's until guys too. How would that be taken? Or if Maiden was originally gay and they changed him to straight? Would you still see it as consistent with they story?
#207
Posté 21 juin 2011 - 08:00
In the End, any illogical and dumb changes in ME3 won't be tolerated (like everyone bi, Pink color for Normandy and Garrus's Armor) by the fans and if that happens Bioware will lose many of his fans including me and many users I know in BSN. Therefore there is large amount of decreasing of benefit to Bioware. Have a nice day.
#208
Posté 21 juin 2011 - 08:01
Good Luck!
#209
Posté 21 juin 2011 - 08:08
the_one_54321 wrote...
Yes, Kaiden.
Actually creating a story arc to illustrate change would be very different from trying to change a background retroactively. Creating more story would be fine.
It's Kaidan.
#210
Guest_Fiddles_stix_*
Posté 21 juin 2011 - 08:10
Guest_Fiddles_stix_*
Mesina2 wrote...
the_one_54321 wrote...
Yes, Kaiden.
Actually creating a story arc to illustrate change would be very different from trying to change a background retroactively. Creating more story would be fine.
It's Kaidan.
#211
Posté 21 juin 2011 - 08:10
IsaacShep wrote...
If a character was gay and changed into straight or straight and changed into gay (GAY, not bi), then it would be a retcon since it would contradict previous attraction. Heterosexuality and homosexuality are exclusive. However if some character reveals he/she is bi (and not only gay/straight), then it doesn't change anything. He/she is still attracted to "my Shep". Of course there's also the issue of first declaration. If Liara declared she doesn't like men at all in ME1 and then said she does in ME2, that would also be a retcon. But if she didn't say anything, then it was only my assumption what was her stance on romancing the other gender and if she ever did it or would do it.
See, now, on this, I'm extremely conflicted. If an exclusively straight character became exclusively gay (or vis-versa), I'd need to see the context before I called it a retcon, because that is what happened to Willow from BtVS. She liked men genuinely and exclusively, but her character evolved to the point that she now likes women exclusively. It did not happen overnight, and was a plot point of several episodes, so I do not consider her change from heterosexual to homosexual a "retcon," but a gradual character development.
Now, I would be opposed to this in a video game, especially ME3, because existing characters may already have a sexual relationship with Shepard. If Kaidan became exclusively gay in ME3, I would be extremely sad, no matter how hard Bioware tried to sell me on whatever "character development" made him exclusively interested in men, because it would mean that he would be no longer interested in the thousands of femSheps who have already romanced him. And that would be awful!
But if Kaidan became bisexual, the femSheps already involved with Kaidan would not lose anything at all. Nor would Kaidan's core character. There would be some sort of plot point about his apparent disinterest in male Shepard before ME3. It would be discussed, but perhaps not in great length. Again, I'd need to see the actual context before I labled it a "retcon" or otherwise, but I think that Bioware has earned my trust in this issue. They always explain these kinds of changes, however brielfy, because they are ever dedicated to fully-developed characters.
Modifié par KawaiiKatie, 21 juin 2011 - 08:12 .
#212
Posté 21 juin 2011 - 08:16
#213
Posté 21 juin 2011 - 08:26
Here's the best solution: you don't want to romance someone of your gender? Don't flirt with them. Problem solved.
#214
Posté 21 juin 2011 - 08:28
Like the changes they made to the qunari in DA2. OK, bioware can change the space hamster into space donkey (and still call it space hamster), and can change everyone who was straight into whatever he wants.lovgreno wrote...
There are no retcons in any story. The writer have the right to twist things however they want. Artistic freedom for BioWare and everyone else. Some may call changes they dislike in a story "retcons" but that is realy just their own irrelevant opinions. In any story the only realy relevant opinion is that of the writer. So let's stop calling it a retcon.
#215
Guest_Fiddles_stix_*
Posté 21 juin 2011 - 08:31
Guest_Fiddles_stix_*
Garbage Master wrote...
Like the changes they made to the qunari in DA2. OK, bioware can change the space hamster into space donkey (and still call it space hamster), and can change everyone who was straight into whatever he wants.
Your syllogism is flawed. You are comparing character development to a pet.
#216
Posté 21 juin 2011 - 08:45
#217
Posté 21 juin 2011 - 08:55
#218
Posté 21 juin 2011 - 08:55
By the way, here's what I consider a better suggestion, and one which has pretty good odds of being present in the final game: If you don't want to romance somebody, don't click on the (probable) heart/flirty option!
Mind. BLOWN.
#219
Posté 21 juin 2011 - 09:26
#220
Posté 21 juin 2011 - 10:09
I've argued all of the points, many of which weren't discussed here. I know the S/S and bi supports will not likely ever change their mind.
In the end it comes down to this: we (non-SS supporters) don't want our perceptions of characters to change. Obviously, our real-life views will influence how we perceive the characters and their sexuality(ies).
Knowing that certain characters can be bi or gay (even if its an option) might still alter our opinions of them. Even, as a poster wrote, if it's simply a little heart for one piece of dialogue. I realize gay/bi people may think this is shallow/intolerant/narrow-minded, but whatever. Its my viewpoint, just like everyone else is entitled to theirs.
Bottom line: its in Bioware's hands. Hopefully they will release some new information soon.
#221
Posté 21 juin 2011 - 11:38
#222
Posté 21 juin 2011 - 11:52
thatguy212 wrote...
I have the real solution to the same sex romance "issue", it may sound strange and hard to implement but i think its really the only way it could be done properly, when someone of the same sex hits on you and you don't want to romance them, simple select the dialogue option that says you don't to romance them
I'm not sure why this idea right here is so difficult for a lot of people to get and accept.
#223
Posté 21 juin 2011 - 12:12
Honestly I just don't want any of my characters in my playthroughs retconned. Granted also, that I could not possibly know them fully. People who are asking for gay relationships want a deeper connection with these characters. I'd still like to feel that same connection to my characters in game that people asking for gay relationships now want for their characters in their games.
But if other people want to have relationships with old characters that they couldn't before, then let them. Granted, it might create more work for Bioware...... Or maybe change a few words in common sentences? I dunno - not a perfect idea.
I hope Bioware respects those people who want their relationships to stay pretty much the same, just as much as they are now trying to respect and fulfill those people who want gay/bi/lesbian/whatever relationships in the game
Modifié par ShdwPlayer, 21 juin 2011 - 12:14 .
#224
Posté 21 juin 2011 - 12:21
I think the OP just wanted a way so that they would never have to shoot down characters who they *thought were straight.
Modifié par ShdwPlayer, 21 juin 2011 - 12:27 .
#225
Posté 21 juin 2011 - 12:27




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut






