All we know that you can refuse Morrigan's offer and make the Warden die agains the Archdemon. To those who accepted the deal there is no problem with this. But what about those who made the Warden die? Well, it comes to my mind the Awakeining epilogue if you are the Orlesian Warden, he returns to the Anderfels because there are news about a new Blight. HERE is the solution for the OGB I think. The Warden dies but the OGB is born with the soul of the Archdemon of this new Blight. Just a theory anyways. What do you think?
Possible canon solution to the OGB
Débuté par
DonutsDealer
, juin 21 2011 07:05
Retour en haut
#2
Posté 21 juin 2011 - 08:30
Nerdage
-
- Members
- 2 467 messages
Maybe, depending on the nature of the child it could leave a pretty awkward age discrepancy though. Seeing as how, if there were another blight after Origins, it should also have to be after DA2 since we certainly would've heard about it if it did happen, even being so far away. If the child turns out to be some sort of monster or something similarly non-human the age wouldn't be such an issue, but if it's a human then the one born of the DAO archdemon would have about a decade on the later one, if not more. If we meet it in mid-life though I guess it wouldn't show so much.
Personally I think people are underestimating BioWare's ability to account for the dark ritual choice without contriving some kind of workaround, and maybe overestimating what the consequences should be in the first place. Who says a child with the soul of an archdemon would be anything more than a human? We don't know if it will keep the consciousness/memories of the archdemon, or the power of the archdemon (whatever that would be), and yet people have decided that there's no possible way to account for the choice because its consequences will be so far-reaching?
In conclusion: Maybe, we'll see.
Personally I think people are underestimating BioWare's ability to account for the dark ritual choice without contriving some kind of workaround, and maybe overestimating what the consequences should be in the first place. Who says a child with the soul of an archdemon would be anything more than a human? We don't know if it will keep the consciousness/memories of the archdemon, or the power of the archdemon (whatever that would be), and yet people have decided that there's no possible way to account for the choice because its consequences will be so far-reaching?
In conclusion: Maybe, we'll see.
Modifié par nerdage, 21 juin 2011 - 08:36 .
#3
Posté 21 juin 2011 - 09:54
DonutsDealer
-
- Members
- 240 messages
Well, about if he is similar to a human, I don't know but I imagine as something similar to an alien as Morrigan said he could be barely called a child after the first day. And about his powers, may he replaces Sandal as enchanment boy, it would be fun xD.
#4
Posté 21 juin 2011 - 10:14
Nerdage
-
- Members
- 2 467 messages
I took her saying it couldn't really be called a child to mean so soon after conception, since she says it in response to "Will the child be hurt?", but the 'child' will be nothing more than a ball of cells when the ritual is finished (ie when the archdemon's killed), so not really a child at all.
