DreamerM wrote...
IanPolaris wrote...
To extend your thought one step further, in Act 3, we can find by various sources that Meredith has kept asking and Elthina has kept denying the Right of Annulment, and that Meredith has taken the extraordinary step of going over Ethina's head to ask the Divine directly for the RoA.
That being so, I have to wonder if Anders merely beat Meredith to the punch. It would be simplicity itself to "bomb" the Chantry and have some circle stooge there to take the fall to make sure that Meredith has the legal right to call the RoA and make sure the circle takes the blame.
Heh, that's a facinating possibility. There is saying that you should select your enemies with care, for they are whom you will come to most closely resemble. Meredith and Anders have a lot in common.
I wonder why Meredith thought the Divine would GRANT the Right Of Annulment, though... again, in 500 years, the Right has only actually been carried out 17 times, so that should tell you how much of a last-resort it really is. Meredith could claim no abominations, no proof of blood magic inside the tower, nothing except her runnaway Crazy Apostate problem, which the Right Of Annulment won't help anyway.
I get people are not always rational, but this is a huge logical gap in Meredith's plans. Which kind of supports my thesis that she's not just crazy, she's also kind of an idiot. 
Fascinating indeed!
Considering that she made helping apostates a hanging offense; and was willing to let her Templars slaughter people simply for providing an apostate relative with food and shelter for the night... I wouldn't be surprised if, in her delusional state of mind, she would start thinking "if Elthina and the Chantry of Kirkwall aren't willing to let us call for the RoA, they are against us!", and be willing to destroy the Chantry while letting a Circle mage take the fall simply to be able to call for the RoA.
By that point, it's pretty clear she sees mages in Kirkwall as a plague that must be eradicated.
So yes, she may have been cheering inwardly when Anders blew up the Chantry.

Lol!
The difference between Anders and she is probably that Meredith saw herself and the Templars as an unstoppable force that could destroy all mages.
While Anders believed that mages are strong enough (but too scared) to face their opressors, and by doing so, eventually acquire their freedom. Especially if the Chantry loses control over two of its main factions (the Circles and the Templars), weakening their social and political strenght.
So, in a way, both Meredith and Anders provided each other with exactly what the other wanted.

Meredith: A chance to rid Kirkwall of the mages menace,
Anders: A mages rebellion against the Templars and the Chantry.
Now, all they need to do is shake hands, and tell each other "Well done!"

Lol!
Still, in the end, Anders (alive or dead) is the only one that truly got his wish... So, I still see Meredith as the one who really ended up being played.
Plus, if he'd waited for Meredith to blow the Chantry hereself while letting a Circle mage take the fall, her actions against the Circle could have been seen as "justified". Blowing up the Chantry as an apostate, and having Meredith call for the RoA (since Elthina is gone) while the Circle had absolutely nothing to do with it only brings more emphasis on the fact that she is no longer acting rationally, and encourages her own people (in the end, Cullen and the Templars) to eventually refuse her authority.
So having Anders do it was the best strategic course of action.