All of this out of the way, the questio must be brought up, "WHY THE HELL DOES IT TAKE A OOB ARCHAEOLOGIST LIARA AND SHEPERD TO POINT OUT THAT THERE MAY BE SOME CONNECTION BETWEEN AL OF THESE EXTINCTIONS!? I mean, if a few extinctions were caused by purposeful geocide and war, the Reaper theory would have no weight. But when every sinle extinction is caused in the same fashion, tou'd think when a hyper-advanced dreadnought class ship comes along, destroys the entire citadel fleet, ad maipuates the citadel in a way that ot even the council knew was possible, all accodring in the way the Reaper theory was presented by Shepard ad Liara, that every thing might click with the council and everything else that these extinctions are related. Instead, the Council in ME2 says there is o evidence supporting the Reaper theory, despite the fact that it was confirmed by their best operative, Shepard, and millions of years of historica evidence. I mean, statistically there would have to be a few planets hastily evacuated if there was a supervolcano extinction, wich would result in Pompeii like perfect preservation, or a few asteroid related extinctions, or something. But no, everyone of these civilizations is destroyed by orital bombardment genocide, almost a traces erased, and the targeted fashion of the bombardment confirmation that it wasn't a natural collision extinction event. So is it just me, or in light of all of this does it seem like the counil has their heads even further up their @sses then previously thought?
Modifié par George-Kinsill, 23 juin 2011 - 01:48 .





Retour en haut







