S.A.K wrote...
If I remember correctly BW said you can play after the credits. Can someone confirm?
Yes, they did. They confirmed that the ME3 NG+ is a combination of the start-over-with-benefits from ME1, and the continue-after-credits of ME2.
S.A.K wrote...
If I remember correctly BW said you can play after the credits. Can someone confirm?
KainrycKarr wrote...
S.A.K wrote...
If I remember correctly BW said you can play after the credits. Can someone confirm?
Yes, they did. They confirmed that the ME3 NG+ is a combination of the start-over-with-benefits from ME1, and the continue-after-credits of ME2.
S.A.K wrote...
BW said that ME3 will have very deferent endings. Some might not be satisfactory than others. But I guess there is an ending where everyone lives just like in ME2. Who knows maybe Shep gets to live with his/her LI happily ever after!
I hope for all fans sake that no LI will unavoidably die. I know if Tali dies it will be really hard for me. I imagine everyone will feel that way if their fevorite diesNewart wrote...
S.A.K wrote...
BW said that ME3 will have very deferent endings. Some might not be satisfactory than others. But I guess there is an ending where everyone lives just like in ME2. Who knows maybe Shep gets to live with his/her LI happily ever after!
I don't think that there would be ending where everyone lives. If the whole game is about the war, Galactic extinction and that there is gonna be some emotinal scenes (most likely squad member deaths), there just have to be at least one situation like you had on Virmire in ME1. Well not necessary that you need to choose, thought that does seems likely, but you at least need to watch someone on your crew to die. You just can't have a war and everyone survives. And I guess that Vega character makes perfect choice for that dying character, because he have no ties to anything from previous games.
Howver I do believe and really hope that there would ending, where Shep and his/hers LI will live happily ever after. I would actually go so far and say that it would be plain stupid from Bw part for not to make ending like that. What would be point of the whole romancing, if it wouldn't really benefit you at the end?
Guest_Arcian_*
Not really. As long as Garrus' death is the most glorious death since the Shuttle-Riding Bat, I'm fine with it. I will mourn him and shed many tender tears, but his awe-inspiring and immortal memory will live on in my heart.S.A.K wrote...
I hope for all fans sake that no LI will unavoidably die. I know if Tali dies it will be really hard for me. I imagine everyone will feel that way if their fevorite dies
KainrycKarr wrote...
I think it's more likely that Tali ISN'T available UNTIL the Quarian/Geth conflict is resolved, and won't be a permanent member if certain conditions aren't met.
GodWood wrote...
As long as it's not "nobody is permanent.... except for Liara" I have no issue with it.
S.A.K wrote...
http://www.digitalsp...ifferently.html
LOL! I know what you mean, no one is permanent thing must mean they are not available for all mission, not that they aren't staying in the Normandy.Newart wrote...
S.A.K wrote...
http://www.digitalsp...ifferently.html
Well, I still say that there had to be near permanent sqaudmates. Because how could you have "Deeper relationships", if other part is not actively around you and outside the mission?
It's hard to pursue any relationship issues, if Cerberus agenst are shooting at you.
Shepard: Hey Tali, about this our relationship....
*Bullets hit their cover and fly over them*
Tali: Now is not really the time for this, Shepard.
Shepard: Yes, I know it's not the most convenient.....
*Both fires back at Cerberus agent*
Shepard:..... time, but you're never around in the Normandy and we only see in these missions.
That would be so much fun, wouldn't it. Relationships on battle field.
This. They've also said they've cut down the team to increase focus on fewer squaddies. I mean, wouldn't putting in 10 temprorary (to smaller or bigger degree) squadmates do the opposite?Newart wrote...
Well, I still say that there had to be near permanent sqaudmates. Because how could you have "Deeper relationships", if other part is not actively around you and outside the mission?
IsaacShep wrote...
This. They've also said they've cut down the team to increase focus on fewer squaddies. I mean, wouldn't putting in 10 temprorary (to smaller or bigger degree) squadmates do the opposite?Newart wrote...
Well, I still say that there had to be near permanent sqaudmates. Because how could you have "Deeper relationships", if other part is not actively around you and outside the mission?
Modifié par KainrycKarr, 27 juin 2011 - 06:03 .