Phaedon wrote...
If I were to make a thread on any of these topics, I would have missed the point of science fiction.
The MEverse consists of some technobabble and also some attempts to futuristic science. The first ones are of course not explained, almost at all, while the fututristic science is of course partially not explained.
The exact same thing applies to the Lazarus Project, technobabble, or not.
Typical science fiction also acknowledges that something has to be done to overcome obstacles.
In the ME universe, travel between solar systems still takes months or years even with FTL drives. Thus the mass relay network is needed. Biotics don't just magically know how to do what they do. They need implants and training. So why not have an acknowledgement that "yes, the brian was tricky, so we used a Macguffin to put it together"? As has been pointed out many times before, the ME universe is not "hard' science fiction. A simple nod to acknowledge the problem is all that's being asked for here. Not for Shep the body, Shep the mind.
I still don't see that even if life was more significant than the very universe and it's form itself, how Lazarus Project can be special. Lazarus Project is yet another plot device, like all of the rest of the technolodgy in ME1 and 2, technobabble or not.
Because almost all the technobabble in the ME universe can trace its origins back to eezo and mass effect fields. The Lazarus Project does not, as far as we can tell. And yet it's the biggest medical miracle ever. It brought the protagonist back to life to fight the Reapers. And it stands outside of known space magic.
Yes medical science in the future appears to be well advanced in some areas. Genetic engineering is way beyond what we can do today. Life expectancy is almost double what it is today. Normally fatal injuries are now survivable. But nothing has indicated that resurrecting the dead was possible. Treating fatal injuries is plausible. Raising the dead adds another layer that requires another explanation.
Eezo explains as much, if not less than the cybernetics and cellular regeneration and restoration.
In the beginning you have eezo and electric current, and in the end you have space time folding.
What happens in the meantime, is not even mentioned.
We are not talking about how scientifically correct the explanation is, we are talking about the lack of explanation.
The feeling I'm getting here is:
The Lazarus Project needs no special answer because nothing can explain it fully.
I say I don't need a full explanation. I don't need "in the meantime" because I know it's rubbish. All I need is a space magic-y answer, much like how FTL or biotics work, and give an example of what I mean.
You say that won't work because it's nonsense, just like eezo or asari reproduction .
So having a lame space magic answer is worse than having no answer?
Mass relays get around the hard science of vast interstellar distances. I see no problem with asking for an equivalent answer to the Lazarus Project.And somehow, yet, you are the one to bring hard science into the argument, while you were asking for a magic eezo-constructed space rock a few sentences earlier. As I said, why the change?
Err, nobody said that Shepard wasn't brain dead. That's the point.
You just acting as if the brain is utterly destroyed, leaving no trace of it's existance.
Actually what I'm saying is even a comparatively small change could lead to a very different Shepard. The brain wouldn't have to be destroyed, just sections of it damaged to cause all sorts of complications. And not just from trauma, but oxygen starvation, or toxin buildup which can lead to brain damage within five minutes.
Unless the SB agents were on Alchera with a huge catcher's mitt waiting for Shepard while the Collectors were still tearing apart the Normandy, that is a pretty much inevitable result.
Surgery on cells? Really? That wouldn't take two years, that would take...let's just say that there are 50 trillion cells in our bodies.
This is the reason that you can't just throw as many magic rocks as you can, anywhere. This is why sometimes you have to stop in the surface of an explanation.
And why that is? Because every single player and their dog (no, not their cat, sorry) can create an image in their minds of a device doing surgery on cells and understand why it wouldn't work at all.
Is it any more or less nonsensical than anything else in the game? The relays? Biotics? Element Zero? The asari? They all have space magic-y answers to fit them into the game's lore, and comparatively few complaints. But the Lazarus Project is, how did you put it? "Special"? It needs nothing but a few cutscenes and Wilson complaining about not being appreciated?
I don't care for an explanation for omni-gel and how it works because I know that I can't possibly get one.
You claim that it would require extreme precision. Try thinking how omni-gel would have to work.
Or is, once again, the Lazarus Project "special". More special than any other element of the sci-fi universe, I guess. It seems to be the only one to which the community demanded an explanation and for that to be true to contemporary science.
Funny how that bolded part worked out, huh?
And here's why I think so:
Biotics are not real
Omnigel is not real
The asari are not real (sorry folks, but it's true. Neither are quarians or turians)
Faster than light travel is not real (yet)
Mass effect fields are not real.
Sentient spaceship space Cthulhu are not real at least I hope not.
Death is real. We know this for fact. People die, and they don't come back. Certainly not after two years. This is something pretty much everyone understands and accepts. So when you do something to make it possible in a science fiction world. People ask how this can be done. I am not talking about NPCs in the game here. I'm talking about the players. Death is real. Death is final. But the Lazarus Project makes it not so real and not so final.
Modifié par iakus, 02 juillet 2011 - 07:17 .





Retour en haut




