Berkilak wrote...
But I digress - a bisexual Kaidan is a shallow copout as opposed to a character written to be bisexual or gay (preferably gay).
In a perfect world, sure.
But there are zots to consider. I personally have zero interest whatsoever in S/S romances in ME3 or any other BioWare game, but in recognizing that others do, I wholeheartedly endorse giving them access to it in a manner which requires the least amount of zots. Which is, quite simply, to make love interests bisexual (or ProtagonistSexual). It's not "shallow," it makes efficient use of limited resources to appeal to the broadest possible customer base.
It doesn't harm me in the least, and it lets people who prefer S/S romances enjoy the love-interest content just as I do. Those who do claim it harms them need - and often, immediately have - their motivations scrutinized.
Personally, I find many of the arguments against S/S inclusion in BioWare games as inherently selfish, considering that those in favor of them simply ask to be able to experience romance storylines with the same relatability and sexual preference that others in the majority take for granted.
Keep in mind that when you argue for a new gay (or even a new bisexual) character to be written to "appeal to the S/S crowd" you are endorsing directing zots away from existing characters to new ones for the express purpose of giving "those people" someone to sleep with. I maintain it is in the interests of players who have little to no interest in S/S romances to support ProtagonistSexual or bisexual love interests because it costs few zots to accomplish an inclusive goal.
Bearbeitet von Upsettingshorts, 27 Juni 2011 - 03:25 .