lovgreno wrote...
I prefer it if ME3 is about fighting reapers first and foremost and frankly I got a bit bored of TIMmy in ME2. It is now time for something new.
This.
lovgreno wrote...
I prefer it if ME3 is about fighting reapers first and foremost and frankly I got a bit bored of TIMmy in ME2. It is now time for something new.
Exactly... I hate seeing Cerberus pigeonholed into the role of antagonist just to try to make the ME2 plot more relevant to the overarching Reaper threat.Slidell505 wrote...
There should only be one antagonist, the Reapers.
Berkilak wrote...
If he's working with a non-human entity, he's indoctrinated. I don't see him as one that is apt to negotiate with any enemy of humanity.... besides, we already saw that storyline with Saren.
I'm just really tired of Cerberus, and I don't feel that they should play too large of a role in a fight for the survival of, not only humanity, but every space-faring species in the galaxy. The Reaper-emissary thing is a worst case scenario. I want the game to feel like a sequel to ME1 more than ME2, since it's dealing with more ME1 issues and Cerberus seems to be shoehorned in.
Guest_The Big Bad Wolf_*
But word is that 40% of enemies fought will be Cerberus. That's... discouraging, to say the least.seirhart wrote...
I want him and cereberus to take a major back seat, 3 is supposed to be about the reapers not about cereberus.
I'd rather TIM be a 'If Loghain had actually been write' figure: evil, perhaps, but ultimately correct.Berkilak wrote...
Loved Loghain, but I would hate to see a similiar role filled by TIM.HTTP 404 wrote...
I want TIM to be akin to Loghain in DA:O. Loghain was the antagonist but he was not necassarily a bad guy, he's priorities were screwed up and still wanted the best for his country. I want to TIM to be more akin to that, where TIM truly believes he is saving mankind, etc.
also Loghain was able to join your cause after you beat him in the Landsmeet. Perhaps there will be that option with TIM
I don't want to see another Cerberus-centric game - this is a battle against extinction, and I don't want to see another aside to distract from that. We've been waiting to fight the Reapers since Virmire... any TIM-centric story just seems as if it would detract from that.
Modifié par Repearized Miranda, 27 juin 2011 - 11:19 .
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Saphra Deden wrote...
I'd have preferred Cerberus to be a minor side faction in ME3 (as a result of Retribution) that Shepard can choose to either deal the killing blow to or salvage for future use against the Reapers and beyond.
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Saaziel wrote...
That would have been an interesting take on things. Though i wonder how well received the "for future use" would have been; Seems like a hollow victory , though i agree , better than nothing at all.
Saphra Deden wrote...
Are you talking to me?
Saphra Deden wrote...
I mean that they'd be useful at the end of the game, providing additional support if you helped them recover some of their losses.
Otherewise you get the satisfaction of destroying once and for all a despicable adversary.
Modifié par Saaziel, 28 juin 2011 - 12:09 .
Praetor Shepard wrote...
I've had this thought for dealing with TIM, that depends on what TIM tries to use Cerberus for in ME3.
So if TIM does go all out against Shepard, I would like a face-to-face confrontation along the lines of Heart of Darkness / Apocalypse Now after defeating the reapers.
clerkenwell wrote...
Oh crap, now I'm envisioning Lair of the Illusive Man DLC.
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Saaziel wrote...
Oh , i thought you were emphasizing the "Future" part, in a hypothetical continuation of the Mass effect universe. I think setting up Cerberus as weaken at the start of ME3, but then be in a position to take on the Reapers by the end of ME3 might be problematic, story-wise , though not impossible.
Saphra Deden wrote...
I didn't say they'd be able to take on the Reapers single-handedly
Modifié par Saaziel, 28 juin 2011 - 12:26 .
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Saaziel wrote...
I didn't mean it that way either.
Modifié par Saaziel, 28 juin 2011 - 12:35 .