Aller au contenu

Photo

Should Tali's face be revealed in ME3 or not?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
563 réponses à ce sujet

#551
who would know

who would know
  • Members
  • 786 messages
I can't be the only one that feels that way.

#552
Guest_Calinstel_*

Guest_Calinstel_*
  • Guests
A transparent visor? No.
Tali, and what quarians we have seen in game, value their privacy or what privacy they have. Tali even states she has never shown anyone her face before and only does so to Shepard (Damn you BW)
This is also why I don't think there will be a mass showing of quarian faces in ME3. Having had so little privacy before, I doubt it would be easy for them to give up what little they had left. Though, once again, if Tali is your Shepards LI, then he will see it (AND the damned player this time BW!)
:)

#553
cobrachris7

cobrachris7
  • Members
  • 28 messages
I would like it more if they didn't have her reveal her face. To me I've always identified her by her helmet, it basically was her face. You can see her eyes at times and sometimes catch the hint of a facial feature but when you get down to it her armor is part of her personality, which includes her helmet, so it's as much her face as anything else.

#554
Guest_Calinstel_*

Guest_Calinstel_*
  • Guests

cobrachris7 wrote...

I would like it more if they didn't have her reveal her face. To me I've always identified her by her helmet, it basically was her face. You can see her eyes at times and sometimes catch the hint of a facial feature but when you get down to it her armor is part of her personality, which includes her helmet, so it's as much her face as anything else.

It's time to show Tali.  The fact that no player knows what Tali or any quarian looks like was okay during ME1, irritating in ME2 and will down right be STUPID in ME3.  BW has trolled their players long enough.

#555
who would know

who would know
  • Members
  • 786 messages
I hope I don't have to romance her to see. That's why I thought it'd be cool for her to get a visor that we can see through all the time. The animation department would need to animate eye movement, but her mouth could stay blocked from view.

No matter the contrivance used to keep her face hidden, a face is so much more interesting to look at than an opaque visor. It is. It'd do wonders for the character.

#556
Guest_Calinstel_*

Guest_Calinstel_*
  • Guests

who would know wrote...

I hope I don't have to romance her to see. That's why I thought it'd be cool for her to get a visor that we can see through all the time. The animation department would need to animate eye movement, but her mouth could stay blocked from view.

No matter the contrivance used to keep her face hidden, a face is so much more interesting to look at than an opaque visor. It is. It'd do wonders for the character.

No, I doubt that would be a requirement.
I just stated (my) explanation for not using a transparent visor.  :)

#557
AcidGlow

AcidGlow
  • Members
  • 291 messages
people are saying no cause it adds a mystery? I think its been long enough and its time to reveal her face. It should be optional of course.

#558
Extort

Extort
  • Members
  • 122 messages
Why not?

#559
IsaacTSmith

IsaacTSmith
  • Members
  • 4 messages
I think the mystery is better.

#560
fern222

fern222
  • Members
  • 109 messages
Does not matter to me. I just really want to see what a Quarian looks like.

#561
S.A.K

S.A.K
  • Members
  • 2 741 messages
I think its time to show and be done with it. They probably would show it. I am expecting something like this.

Image IPB

:whistle:
I am just kidding of cause. Its reasonable to think they'll make her look cute.

#562
S.A.K

S.A.K
  • Members
  • 2 741 messages
double post.

#563
Reorte

Reorte
  • Members
  • 6 593 messages
If her face is seen it'll jar quite badly if it's too different from what can be seen through the visor in ME1 and 2.

#564
mkonrad6288

mkonrad6288
  • Members
  • 33 messages
Nope. Sometimes you just gotta get used to disappointment, and Quarians do hide their faces after all.