Capt. Obvious wrote...
He didn't have to be a POV and quite frankly, I found him bland.
Oh, I totally agree. Also, his trip made the trip that Tyrion took useless. We saw the same places, through his eyes first. He added nothing to the story other than a somewhat hilarious end.
Addai67 wrote...The two Targaryens will have to work together, assuming both of them survive and continue to win victories.
Well, Jon is potentially AA reborn (or so my crackpot theory goes), so he could always lead the way like that.
But my money is more seriously on Jon, Bran + another Stark (maybe Arya) warging into the dragons as a way to control them (and steal control) away from Victarion.
Mondo47 wrote...
My question - how does this sit with you the reader? Does it still feel like fantasy, or more a retelling of medieval history? Is Martin's universe richer or poorer for it? How does the complete unflinching nature of it all leave you? China Meiville has described the slavish attachment to Tolkien-like worlds as "a wen on the arse of fantasy" - would you agree or disagree when looking at the world of Ice & Fire?
The fantasy, for me, is the magic, not the tone. It feels like medieval society the way medievals might have really seen it - the imagined witches and magic and spirits were, in this case all completely real, and it's cool to see. But it's fantasy that feels much more like our world but with magic.
Tolkien like worlds are just a yoke against creativity.





Retour en haut






