naughty99 wrote...
Spoiler-free review of Dance With Dragons
I'll wait until I read it. I've read a lot of book reviews before and the books in question weren't up to what they were promised.
Guest_Capt. Obvious_*
naughty99 wrote...
Spoiler-free review of Dance With Dragons
KenKenpachi wrote...
Sounds nice, saddly it reminds me of the fact we have no idea how long it will be till the next book
TJPags wrote...
KenKenpachi wrote...
Sounds nice, saddly it reminds me of the fact we have no idea how long it will be till the next book
I'm thinking somewhere around 2017 sounds about right.
naughty99 wrote...
TJPags wrote...
KenKenpachi wrote...
Sounds nice, saddly it reminds me of the fact we have no idea how long it will be till the next book
I'm thinking somewhere around 2017 sounds about right.
I don't know about that.
I'm pretty sure that A Dream of Spring will take GRRM less time to write than Dance With Dragons.
The Winds of Winter, probably slightly less or the same.
The reason is because in any story it is always most challenging to write the second act. (what happens in the middle, after the beginning but before the end)
Once the "middle" is finished, if you did a good job, then the end is always much easier to write.
The aspects of Martin's work that have endeared him to fans are abundant here—rich world building, narrative twists and turns, and gritty depictions of the human struggle for power. Characters who were sorely missed in Feast—Daenerys Targaryen, Tyrion Lannister, and Jon Snow—make up more than a third of the novel, and Martin is wise enough to give us at least a chapter from (almost) everyone else.
Weaknesses that have plagued Martin's previous books are also present: too much repetition, unexceptional prose, and characters who use the same idioms (and have sex in exactly the same manner) no matter their ethnicity, social class, or continent. But while A Dance with Dragons cries out for better editing, it remains entirely engrossing. Martin has hidden so many clues and red herrings throughout his previous volumes that it is a thrill to see certain pieces fall into place.
I've always agreed with William Faulkner—he said that the human heart in conflict with itself is the only thing worth writing about. I've always taken that as my guiding principle, and the rest is just set dressing. I mean, you can have a dragon, you can have a science fiction story set on a distant planet with aliens and starships, you can have a western about a gunslinger, or a mystery novel about a private eye, or even literary fiction—and ultimately you're still writing about the human heart in conflict with itself. So that's the way I try to approach this thing. And while I may work within a genre, I've never liked to be bound by them. I have a lot of fun in frustrating genre expectations, using a bit of this or a bit of that, and doing something that hasn't been done before.
I have gotten letters over the years from readers who don't like the sex, they say it's "gratuitous." I think that word gets thrown around and what it seems to mean is "I didn't like it." This person didn't want to read it, so it's gratuitous to that person. And if I'm guilty of having gratuitous sex, then I'm also guilty of having gratuitous violence, and gratuitous feasting, and gratuitous description of clothes, and gratuitous heraldry, because very little of this is necessary to advance the plot. But my philosophy is that plot advancement is not what the experience of reading fiction is about. If all we care about is advancing the plot, why read novels? We can just read Cliffs Notes.
A novel for me is an immersive experience where I feel as if I have lived it and that I've tasted the food and experienced the sex and experienced the terror of battle. So I want all of the detail, all of the sensory things—whether it's a good experience, or a bad experience, I want to put the reader through it. To that mind, detail is necessary, showing not telling is necessary, and nothing is gratuitous.
I've been burned too much by that, so I'll just say... it will be done when it's done.
At least GRRM is admitting now that he's on Valve Time.Addai67 wrote...
On book six:I've been burned too much by that, so I'll just say... it will be done when it's done.
Addai67 wrote...
On book six:I've been burned too much by that, so I'll just say... it will be done when it's done.
"Hey, wait a minute!" some of you may be saying about now. "Wait a minute, wait a minute! Where's Dany and the dragons? Where's Tyrion? We hardly saw Jon Snow. That can't be all of it. . . ."
Well, no. There's more to come. Another book as big as this one.
I did not forget to write about the other characters. Far from it. I wrote lots about them. Pages and pages and pages. Chapters and more chapters. I was still writing when it dawned on me that the book had become too big to publish in a single volume . . . and I wasn't close to finished yet. To tell the story that I wanted to tell, I was going to have to cut the book in two.
The simplest way to do that would have been to take what I had, chop it in half around the middle, and end with "To Be Continued". The more I thought about that, however, the more I felt that the readers would be better served by a book that told all the story for half the characters, rather than half the story for all the characters. So that's the route I chose to take.
Tyrion, Jon, Dany, Stannis and Melisandre, Davos Seaworth, and all the rest of the characters you love or love to hate will be along next year (I devoutly hope) in A Dance with Dragons, which will focus on events along the Wall and across the sea, just as the present book focused on King's Landing.
- George R. R. Martin
June, 2005
naughty99 wrote...
TJPags wrote...
KenKenpachi wrote...
Sounds nice, saddly it reminds me of the fact we have no idea how long it will be till the next book
I'm thinking somewhere around 2017 sounds about right.
I don't know about that.
I'm pretty sure that A Dream of Spring will take GRRM less time to write than Dance With Dragons.
The Winds of Winter, probably slightly less or the same.
The reason is because in any story it is always most challenging to write the second act. (what happens in the middle, after the beginning but before the end)
Once the "middle" is finished, if you did a good job, then the end is always much easier to write.
Uh... I think so. I got up early to blearily download my Nook version, and I sort of blew past the maps, but I think there was one of the Free Cities. There was one of Valyria.Brockololly wrote...
At least GRRM is admitting now that he's on Valve Time.Addai67 wrote...
On book six:I've been burned too much by that, so I'll just say... it will be done when it's done.
I'm still only about 1/2 through A Feast for Crows so I might hold off on getting ADwD tomorrow. Then again, I might swing by Barnes and Noble and pick it up just to have...isn't there supposed to be a map of the Free Cities in it for the first time?
Modifié par naughty99, 12 juillet 2011 - 05:43 .
GRRM mentioned the maps in an interview. He says they got a new map artist to do the several new ones, so they had the same person re-do the others so they'd be in the same style.Brockololly wrote...
Just picked it up from Barnes and Noble even though I've got about 200 pages left in AFfC. The maps are lovely though!
Modifié par Addai67, 15 juillet 2011 - 04:57 .
Let's not give the man a heart attack, I'll not be responsible for him not finishing the series. lolMaria13 wrote...
Lucky, lucky you! Can you give him a kiss for me?
Modifié par Brockololly, 15 juillet 2011 - 06:35 .