665 réponses à ce sujet

[HiddenKING]

Time4Tiddy wrote...

mrsph wrote...

All of these threads really just make people look insecure about their sexuality.

You mean the straight guys who "accidentally" slept with Zevran because DA:O "forced" them to, and then got pissy about how they were "railroaded" into gay sex?

It's not gay if it's an elf. Them the rules.

[AlexandraK]

King Zeel wrote...

There's no reasoning with the s/s shippers. So no more compromising from me. I AM 100%, 24/7 AGAINST HOMOSEXUALITY IN MASS EFFECT SERIES.

So you don't have to play it. And if you want, you don't have to choose that kind of romance.

[slimgrin]

Quit feeding this people, really.

Modifié par slimgrin, 28 juin 2011 - 12:48 .

[Bocks]

Dhiro wrote...

I believe that trusting the writers will give betters results than making a pointless thread.

The last time I trusted the writers I got forced, tacked on romances for Garrus and Tali.

Oh, and don't forget the PRIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIZEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

[mesmerizedish]

Gay threads are the best threads.

[King Zeel]

Rose20 wrote...

King Zeel wrote...

There's no reasoning with the s/s shippers. So no more compromising from me. I AM 100%, 24/7 AGAINST HOMOSEXUALITY IN MASS EFFECT SERIES.

So you don't have to play it. And if you want, you don't have to choose that kind of romance.

I'm not acknowleding this moronic argument anymore.

How about this, if you want something not already in the game, shut the hell up and go away.

[Dhiro]

Bocks wrote...

Dhiro wrote...

I believe that trusting the writers will give betters results than making a pointless thread.

The last time I trusted the writers I got forced, tacked on romances for Garrus and Tali.

Oh, and don't forget the PRIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIZEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Sucks to be you, then.

[mousestalker]

I've posted here and I'm not seeing rainbows. This thread sucks. It's false advertising is what it is.

[Bocks]

Luna Siwora wrote...

WHAT THE HELL. Is this an "I DISLIKE S/S ROMANCES" party now?! I demand to know why wasn't I invited! Oh, yeah... BECAUSE I'M NOT NARROW-MINDED.

Apparently you are, because I'm not against gay romance. I'm against gay romance if it is written in a way that destroys the character, which is a concern that is totally backed up by previous romances written by the Bioware, erm, writers.

[Time4Tiddy]

Bocks wrote...

All the other threads are generally just ****ing about how "NOOO I DONT WANT MY CAHRACTR RUIND BCUZ OF THE GAYS" or "WHY DO YOU PEOPLE WANT GAY SEX"

I just wanted to make a thread that expresses the concerns of the heterosexual section (probably not the right way to classify us, but bear with me) in a clear way and that shows how s/s romances should not be something that is tacked on.

There has yet to be a thread in which the "heterosexual section", whatever that is, made any argument other than:

1) It makes me personally uncomfortable
2) It's morally sick and wrong
3) I might find myself "accidentally" watching gay sex acts

None of these arguments have any validity at all in a logical debate, which is why none of these threads go anywhere.

[Bocks]

Time4Tiddy wrote...

There has yet to be a thread in which the "heterosexual section", whatever that is, made any argument other than:

1) It makes me personally uncomfortable
2) It's morally sick and wrong
3) I might find myself "accidentally" watching gay sex acts

None of these arguments have any validity at all in a logical debate, which is why none of these threads go anywhere.

You best start believeing in threads that have different arguments.

YOU'RE IN ONE.

[ipgd]

All this thread need is ReconTeam and it'll be great.

[shepskisaac]

Bocks wrote...
Apparently you are, because I'm not against gay romance. I'm against gay romance if it is written in a way that destroys the character, which is a concern that is totally backed up by previous romances written by the Bioware, erm, writers.

I think you forgot about the possibility that majority disagrees with you that Tali & Garrus romances were horrible and destroyed the characters.

[Gunderic]

Luna Siwora wrote...

WHAT THE HELL. Is this an "I DISLIKE S/S ROMANCES" party now?! I demand to know why wasn't I invited! Oh, yeah... BECAUSE I'M NOT NARROW-MINDED.

Your signature does give off... some vibe of skepticism about that.

[Zkyire]

Luna Siwora wrote...

WHAT THE HELL. Is this an "I DISLIKE S/S ROMANCES" party now?! I demand to know why wasn't I invited! Oh, yeah... BECAUSE I'M NOT NARROW-MINDED.

People aren't allowed to not like homosexuality now?

What was that about not being narrow-minded?

[saMoorai]

ipgd wrote...

All this thread need is ReconTeam and it'll be great.

ReconTeam is here in spirit and in our Hearts.

[ObserverStatus]

mousestalker wrote...

I've posted here and I'm not seeing rainbows. This thread sucks. It's false advertising is what it is.

The internet is full of empty promises and lies, get used to it.  Once I fell in love with a spambot, but she was a cruel mistress and broke my heart in the end.

[AlexandraK]

King Zeel wrote...

Rose20 wrote...

King Zeel wrote...

There's no reasoning with the s/s shippers. So no more compromising from me. I AM 100%, 24/7 AGAINST HOMOSEXUALITY IN MASS EFFECT SERIES.

So you don't have to play it. And if you want, you don't have to choose that kind of romance.

I'm not acknowleding this moronic argument anymore.

How about this, if you want something not already in the game, shut the hell up and go away.

S/S romances will be in the game, and BioWare don't care what you want. Sorry.

[Sunnie]

I may get slapped for this, but it is so, so, sooooo appropriate...

[Harmless Crunch]

I'll be annoyed if they do conveniently reveal a character sexuality like of say Garrus just happened to become Bi because....well...ummm.
I wouldn't mind if say Jack was available to female Shepard's because she herself (Jack) said that she had slept with women.
So yeah if it stretches believability then I don't want it but I'm fine with S/S romances if it makes sense.