665 réponses à ce sujet

[shepskisaac]

RinpocheSchnozberry wrote...

I think the take away from this thread is the number of "straight" people who find the gay option in these games. And how easily they find it.

Hmmmm?

Hmmmmmmmmmmmm?

You know, accidentally

[A Crusty Knight Of Colour]

Meh, as long as the romances themselves are written in a good way and not the copy pasta way that DA 2 romances were written, I don't see a problem. The "changing" or "retconning" the character's sexuality could be apart of a diverging narrative where the squaddies realise, deal with and accept their sexuality if ****** or bi sexual.

Ultimately, that would be the most satisfying way as people gunning for a homosexual romance can really feel like they are exploring their LIs in a meaningful way (no pun intended) whereas people gunning for a heterosexual romance don't feel like the characters have been retconned as their romantic questlines ought to diverge into a different direction and be as well written.

Of course, this is going to lead to pointless arguments over "canon" characters, but I'd take that any day over DA 2's ham fisted approach or having no homosexual or bisexual LIs at all.

[Bocks]

IEatWhatIPoo wrote...

Why else wouldn't you?

You have no problem seeing heterosexual content happening without the player (you) initiating it.

So if you don't want homosexual content happening without the player (you) initiating it then you must find it what then? Displeasing? Gross?

You obviously didn't read my post very well.

I AM OKAY WITH HOMOSEXUAL CONTENT THAT THE PLAYER DOESN'T INITIATE AS LONG AS THIS CONTENT  IS NOT INITIATED BY CHARACTERS FROM MASS EFFECT 1 OR 2. In that case, Shepard should be the one initiating the content, so that homosexual players can enjoy their homosexual romance and heterosexual players can enjoy not seeing homosexual content.

James Vega coming onto me is one thing. Garrus coming onto me is another thing entirely.

[RinpocheSchnozberry]

Crimmsonwind wrote...

Now excuse me, my totally awesome lesbian Shepard has a galaxy to save and copious amounts of alien lesbian sex to have.

Go swiftly unto your noble goal, shining one.  Fly with the powers of Great Justice to guide you.  Take pictures.

[Darthnemesis2]

This is the worst gay thread ever. No rainbows. No Gaga. No dudes kissing.

OP, I am disappoint.

[Spawny]

Crimmsonwind wrote...

If you don't pick flirty options, you won't come on to your squad mates, which means you won't have to worry about Garrus "loving you back." Just make it clear you're only interested in being a bro. Problem solved. Sexuality will not transform a character's personality. Garrus will not suddenly turn into a raging homosexual in pink combat armor with a feather boa. He will be Garrus. Our beloved bad-ass turian one-liner.

Damn right! I agree with all of this!.... though the pink combat armor with feather boa would be HOT! <3

[Rinji the Bearded]

Harmless Crunch wrote...

RinjiRenee wrote...

Romance are a relatively minor aspect of the game.

Believe it or not, there are other parts of the game that you could also be concerned with.

You mean people buy Mass effect for reasons other than virtual smexy timez? u r lieing

NO WAI

[Zkyire]

Bocks wrote...

IEatWhatIPoo wrote...

Why else wouldn't you?

You have no problem seeing heterosexual content happening without the player (you) initiating it.

So if you don't want homosexual content happening without the player (you) initiating it then you must find it what then? Displeasing? Gross?

You obviously didn't read my post very well.

I AM OKAY WITH HOMOSEXUAL CONTENT THAT THE PLAYER DOESN'T INITIATE AS LONG AS THIS CONTENT  IS NOT INITIATED BY CHARACTERS FROM MASS EFFECT 1 OR 2. In that case, Shepard should be the one initiating the content, so that homosexual players can enjoy their homosexual romance and heterosexual players can enjoy not seeing homosexual content.

James Vega coming onto me is one thing. Garrus coming onto me is another thing entirely.

Fair enough, must've misread a post.

[AngelicMachinery]

The Big Bad Wolf wrote...

IsaacShep wrote...

The Big Bad Wolf wrote...
Let me say this as well, I don't oppose s/s romance in general, I oppose making current LIs (either all, some, or even one) bi.

How do you know they're (all, some or one) not already bi? No, revealing attraction to one gender does not rule out attraction to other gender. Simple. It's just logic. So unless these characters told you they're straight, you, nor I for that matter can know for certain they're not bisexual.

And how do you know they are already bi? And why do they need to state their sexuality?

How do you know, that you know that he knows that you know that they're all *Insert sexuality*

[Rinji the Bearded]

The Big Bad Wolf wrote...

IsaacShep wrote...

The Big Bad Wolf wrote...
Let me say this as well, I don't oppose s/s romance in general, I oppose making current LIs (either all, some, or even one) bi.

How do you know they're (all, some or one) not already bi? No, revealing attraction to one gender does not rule out attraction to other gender. Simple. It's just logic. So unless these characters told you they're straight, you, nor I for that matter can know for certain they're not bisexual.

And how do you know they are already bi? And why do they need to state their sexuality?

Because they're fictional characters and do not possess a mind of their own.

[Bocks]

IEatWhatIPoo wrote...

Bocks wrote...

IEatWhatIPoo wrote...

Why else wouldn't you?

You have no problem seeing heterosexual content happening without the player (you) initiating it.

So if you don't want homosexual content happening without the player (you) initiating it then you must find it what then? Displeasing? Gross?

You obviously didn't read my post very well.

I AM OKAY WITH HOMOSEXUAL CONTENT THAT THE PLAYER DOESN'T INITIATE AS LONG AS THIS CONTENT  IS NOT INITIATED BY CHARACTERS FROM MASS EFFECT 1 OR 2. In that case, Shepard should be the one initiating the content, so that homosexual players can enjoy their homosexual romance and heterosexual players can enjoy not seeing homosexual content.

James Vega coming onto me is one thing. Garrus coming onto me is another thing entirely.

Fair enough, must've misread a post.

Finally, someone understands what I'm trying to say. I'm not against s/s romances. I want to play ME3 without them, but I don't want another half of the community to not be happy because of what I want. At the same time, I don't want my experience hurt because of what they want. I just hope Bioware finds a way to make everyone happy.

Hypocritically, I romanced Tali.

[Zkyire]

AngelicMachinery wrote...

The Big Bad Wolf wrote...

IsaacShep wrote...

The Big Bad Wolf wrote...
Let me say this as well, I don't oppose s/s romance in general, I oppose making current LIs (either all, some, or even one) bi.

How do you know they're (all, some or one) not already bi? No, revealing attraction to one gender does not rule out attraction to other gender. Simple. It's just logic. So unless these characters told you they're straight, you, nor I for that matter can know for certain they're not bisexual.

And how do you know they are already bi? And why do they need to state their sexuality?

How do you know, that you know that he knows that you know that they're all *Insert sexuality*

http://www.youtube.c...JJAPL5vGA#t=10s

[Special_Agent_Goodwrench]

HagSpawn wrote...

Crimmsonwind wrote...

If you don't pick flirty options, you won't come on to your squad mates, which means you won't have to worry about Garrus "loving you back." Just make it clear you're only interested in being a bro. Problem solved. Sexuality will not transform a character's personality. Garrus will not suddenly turn into a raging homosexual in pink combat armor with a feather boa. He will be Garrus. Our beloved bad-ass turian one-liner.

Damn right! I agree with all of this!.... though the pink combat armor with feather boa would be HOT IMPRESSIVE! <3

[VirtualStranger]

Bocks wrote...

You obviously didn't read my post very well.

I AM OKAY WITH HOMOSEXUAL CONTENT THAT THE PLAYER DOESN'T INITIATE AS LONG AS THIS CONTENT  IS NOT INITIATED BY CHARACTERS FROM MASS EFFECT 1 OR 2. In that case, Shepard should be the one initiating the content, so that homosexual players can enjoy their homosexual romance and heterosexual players can enjoy not seeing homosexual content.

James Vega coming onto me is one thing. Garrus coming onto me is another thing entirely.

You obviously didn't read my post very well.

I AM OKAY WITH HETEROSEXUAL CONTENT THAT THE PLAYER DOESN'T INITIATE AS LONG AS THIS CONTENT IS NOT INITIATED BY CHARACTERS FROM MASS EFFECT 1 OR 2. In that case, Shepard should be the one initiating the content, so that Heterosexual players can enjoy their heterosexual romance and homosexual players can enjoy not seeing heterosexual content.

A new female squadmate coming onto me is one thing. Ashley coming onto me is another thing entirely.

FIXED. This is what gay players would sound like if they were as priviledged as you.

Modifié par VirtualStranger, 28 juin 2011 - 01:52 .

[Harmless Crunch]

RinjiRenee wrote...

Harmless Crunch wrote...

RinjiRenee wrote...

Romance are a relatively minor aspect of the game.

Believe it or not, there are other parts of the game that you could also be concerned with.

You mean people buy Mass effect for reasons other than virtual smexy timez? u r lieing

NO WAI

SO FULL OF WIN

[Time4Tiddy]

AngelicMachinery wrote...

The Big Bad Wolf wrote...

And how do you know they are already bi? And why do they need to state their sexuality?

How do you know, that you know that he knows that you know that they're all *Insert sexuality*

Oh, I know!

[Sin of Leet]

IsaacShep wrote...

RinpocheSchnozberry wrote...

I think the take away from this thread is the number of "straight" people who find the gay option in these games. And how easily they find it.

Hmmmm?

Hmmmmmmmmmmmm?

You know, accidentally

"Oh yes, "accidentally", that term used when you do something you didn't mean to do. We have dismissed that claim."

[AngelicMachinery]

IEatWhatIPoo wrote...

AngelicMachinery wrote...

The Big Bad Wolf wrote...

IsaacShep wrote...

The Big Bad Wolf wrote...
Let me say this as well, I don't oppose s/s romance in general, I oppose making current LIs (either all, some, or even one) bi.

How do you know they're (all, some or one) not already bi? No, revealing attraction to one gender does not rule out attraction to other gender. Simple. It's just logic. So unless these characters told you they're straight, you, nor I for that matter can know for certain they're not bisexual.

And how do you know they are already bi? And why do they need to state their sexuality?

How do you know, that you know that he knows that you know that they're all *Insert sexuality*

http://www.youtube.c...JJAPL5vGA#t=10s

I mad.

[Eternal Dust]

Why is everyone taking these threads seriously?

[shepskisaac]

The Big Bad Wolf wrote...
And how do you know they are already bi? And why do they need to state their sexuality?

Ahh but I said it includes me as well thus I cannot know it either. And why do they need to state their sexuality? For the same reasons people IRL do it. Do you think real-life bisexuals don't get the same "Wait whaaa? How!? But you flirted with a girl yesterday?!" questions? Bisexuality = liking BOTH women and men. Mean when a bisexual person talks about hot hot that one blonde girl is, that person really means it. But that person also likes men.

[RinpocheSchnozberry]

AngelicMachinery wrote...

How do you know, that you know that he knows that you know that they're all *Insert sexuality*

Technically, I think we're all "insert sexual" just in different ways.