Ce sujet est fermé
Skirata129 wrote...
of course I want a medic who is working for a profit. the better a job he does on me, the more business he gets and the more he profits. if he ****s up, he loses a patient and a source of income.mauro2222 wrote...
Skirata129 wrote...
of course violent behavior has something in common with war. They are both fueled by aggression and/or ambition. and for your earlier post, society will never reject money unless some post apocalyptic scenario sends us back to the barter system and even then it would redevelop.mauro2222 wrote...
Skirata129 wrote...
Realistically the military will always exist. name a time in our history when we have not been at war. now look at our closest relatives- chimpanzees and other primates and name when they haven't had violent conflicts.mauro2222 wrote...
Han Shot First wrote...
Fat people should still be disqualified from military service in the future. Simply put, a fat person would not be able to handle the physical demands of either life in the military or combat. So it is realistic that everyone on Shep's team is physically fit. Being physically fit would be one of the prerequisites.
Sure, there should probably be some fat civilians wandering around on colony words or on the Citadel. But I can understand why Bioware didn't devote time to creating character models for them, and I'd rather than time was spent on creating female Turians or new aliens, like the Raloi.
Realistically, in our world I doubt that by that year the military would even exist.
edit: also, yes all those things are in our blood. they're what drove us to the top of the food chain in the first place. and of course dogs can love, at least in the human definition of the word. there's plenty of documented cases of dogs sacrificing themselves for humans, risking their lives for humans and other assorted instances where the dog WAS NOT TRAINED in any way to do those things.
Violent behavior has nothing in common with war... If you imply that an individual conflict is the same as a war, then you are saying that a entire nation hates the other and they kill each other because of it.
Your idea of everyone working not for themselves but for the advancement of humankind is probably the most back asswards thing I've heard. by advancing themselves, humanity is advanced. when someone invents the television to make a profit, both he and humanity profited. Asking people to work for no personal gain whatsoever is evil and can only end in tears and bloodshed.
WOOO WOOO WOOO.
What the hell? you think that a monetary system is an advanced economic system? and you also think that human society is advanced? wohohoh In which world you live?
"Asking people to work for no personal gain whatsoever is evil and can only end in tears and bloodshed"
So you prefer a medic that works for money and when he sees you he only saw a number instead of a person, nice!
I dont really remember who said it (or Plato or Socrates) that work is not a media to gain something material, is a media to improve themselves.
WAHAHAHAH XD sorry but its really weird to hear a person saying that it prefers to be cured by a medic who gives a **** than a medic who is medic because he wants to cure people
Thats why we have wars, people thinks how they could get more money instead of caring for the person who is in front of them. And I like when you say that if he doesn t work for money he is ****ed up and kills people xD
Retour en haut
I didnt know that socialist countries had Private Ownership. If the ****s were socialist the first thing that they would have done is ally with the soviet union xD. Socialism is not perfect yet is better than capitalism. But personally a resource based economy is better. And the fail of that you call socialist countries is the result of uneducation again.
