Which one of the alien races in Mass Effect do you think could resemble aliens in real life in our galaxy?
#1
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 01:56
#2
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 01:58
#3
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 02:01
#4
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 02:02
#5
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 02:02
#6
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 02:05
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
#7
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 02:06
-Polite
#8
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 02:06
#9
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 02:08
#10
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 02:08
#11
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 02:08
Modifié par HogarthHughes 3, 28 juin 2011 - 02:14 .
#12
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 02:09
#13
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 02:10
#14
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 02:12
#15
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 02:41
Praetor Shepard wrote...
This feels like a trick question!
#16
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 03:08
#17
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 03:33
Aris Ravenstar wrote...
Thresher maws or elcor. Anything more human-like in appearance or too closely resembling an Earth animal just seems unlikely to me.
I would be interested in knowing where you figure out what is or isnt likely. All that we know for fact, is that bi-peds are the only sort to ever evolve the necessary features to reach sentience.
Given that, a factual statement would be that a human-like appearance (ala bi-ped with free arms/hands to manipulate tools) would be the only option that we know to be likely.
@OP so...I donno. I'm gonna say Salarians just because they are reminiscent of nearly every space-alien abduction sketch humans have ever come up with. Maybe that redneck who got probed was on to something.
Modifié par Sheppard-Commander, 28 juin 2011 - 03:35 .
#18
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 03:47
I would kill the entire human race for that.
#19
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 03:49
now intelligence is a whole other issue entirely, but again; with the vastness of this one galaxy, it's possible. . .
Modifié par darklordpocky-san, 28 juin 2011 - 03:52 .
#20
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 03:54
Aris Ravenstar wrote...
Thresher maws or elcor. Anything more human-like in appearance or too closely resembling an Earth animal just seems unlikely to me.
Do you also believe that it is unlikely that calcium exist anywhere else in the universe?
I don't see how organic evolution is any different than any other natural phenomenon. Clearly, organic life is just as much a certainty given certain circumstances just like iron will form under certain circumstances.
As far as the thread topic goes I'd say... the drell.
Modifié par The Twilight God, 28 juin 2011 - 03:57 .
#21
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 05:19
Modifié par ninja wannabe, 28 juin 2011 - 05:21 .
#22
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 05:27
FOR BIG STUPID JELLYFISH!
#23
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 12:26
BlaznZero wrote...
Hanar, more of a hope than an educated guess. They're pretty awesome...
FOR BIG STUPID JELLYFISH!
Hanar are the least likely to develop technology. Their tentacles are too thick to provide any dexterity.
#24
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 12:38
why wold bipedal be unlikely if you use earh as an example of evolution all those aqotic life forms are millions of years old and unevoled due to the lack of drastic enviromental change. where as bipedal creatures ie humans had to adapt to a constant changing enviroment that evolved our lrger and supior brains. whales, octopi,dolphinsand other aquotic life each a apex of evolution due to the little eviromental change of the ocean. thuse they peak and platuo on their eviolution. now also look at the extreamly short time it took the human speacies to evolve to the dominant life on earth. in roughly less than a million years. earth its self has had three mass extinctions that restarted surface life wail aquotic life has been relatively unchanged sence the begining of the oceans. so if anything bipedal speacies would be the most common if not domiant form of intelagent life. I could go into the finer details of the positives of four limbed upright bipedal life but tha wld be a long topic.yfullman wrote...
hanar. Aquatic creatures tend to be the most intellegent(whales, octopi, dolphins, etc) Anything bipedal seems unlikely
#25
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 12:49




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut






