WHY ARE THESE GAY THREADS STILL OPEN AND MINE IS CLOSED
#1
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 04:34
#2
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 04:36
#3
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 04:37
#4
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 04:38
Actually, the majority of the newly opened gay threads are against s/s romances, read the titles. #oops Your PC argument failsReconTeam wrote...
Because political correctness dictates you can't offend them but shutting their threads.
#5
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 04:38
#6
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 04:39
#7
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 04:39
#8
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 04:40
IsaacShep wrote...
Actually, the majority of the newly opened gay threads are against s/s romances, read the titles. #oops Your PC argument fails
Actually, most of the topics are looking for some sort of compromise yet you're not interested in that, so you fail... again.
#9
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 04:41
"No gays evar." isn't really a discussion that can even be had.
And don't worry about offending me... I don't take much offense from breeding stock (a jest! see... we can "make fun" of each other and it can be all cool... unless, you're suddenly really offended by being called breeding stock... in which case, I am deeply sorry for my lack of political correctness)
#10
Guest_The Big Bad Wolf_*
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 04:42
Guest_The Big Bad Wolf_*
#11
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 04:42
Modifié par Destroy Raiden , 28 juin 2011 - 04:44 .
#12
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 04:43
Not really their against ME1 & 2 characters coming out the closet and are in favor of S/S romances from new charactersIsaacShep wrote...
Actually, the majority of the newly opened gay threads are against s/s romances, read the titles. #oops Your PC argument failsReconTeam wrote...
Because political correctness dictates you can't offend them but shutting their threads.
#13
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 04:43
#14
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 04:44
Doesn't matter, they're from the anti-s/s side of the debate so your PC argument still fails lolReconTeam wrote...
Actually, most of the topics are looking for some sort of compromise yet you're not interested in that, so you fail... again.
#15
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 04:44
Medhia Nox wrote...
I think it's because you left no room for some compromise.
"No gays evar." isn't really a discussion that can even be had.
And don't worry about offending me... I don't take much offense from breeding stock (a jest! see... we can "make fun" of each other and it can be all cool... unless, you're suddenly really offended by being called breeding stock... in which case, I am deeply sorry for my lack of political correctness)
That's in pretty poor taste, actually.
#16
Guest_jollyorigins_*
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 04:44
Guest_jollyorigins_*
#17
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 04:45
Then why are 2 big threads against s/s romances withDestroy Raiden wrote...
Because they consider you a hate monger for having a difference of opinion. It's not cool to be against s/s changes for established characters.
established
characters still opened?
#18
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 04:46
#19
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 04:47
regardless of what they are about, they should be locked.
Even though ReconTeam is right most of them ARE about "compromising" and not perverting our character, which there's no ass big enough that we could kiss to get that anyways.
So yeah, waste of time.
Modifié par King Zeel, 28 juin 2011 - 04:51 .
#20
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 04:48
ReconTeam wrote...
IsaacShep wrote...
Actually, the majority of the newly opened gay threads are against s/s romances, read the titles. #oops Your PC argument fails
Actually, most of the topics are looking for some sort of compromise yet you're not interested in that, so you fail... again.
Well then thats not about being PC.
Besides Bioware generally keeps it down to one homosexual focused thread. Its been like this for years. Sometimes the slip up. Probably nobody watching right now or some other thing we arent aware of. The idea that its about being Politically correct is just wacky
#21
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 04:48
#22
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 04:50
IsaacShep wrote...
Doesn't matter, they're from the anti-s/s side of the debate so your PC argument still fails lol
Anybody who doesn't cave to your every demand is part of the "anti-s/s" side in your book, so your argument fails yet again.
#23
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 04:50
#24
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 04:51
#25
Posté 28 juin 2011 - 04:52
And your PC excuse still doesn't fit. Bravo!ReconTeam wrote...
Anybody who doesn't cave to your every demand is part of the "anti-s/s" side in your book, so your argument fails yet again.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut






