Firstly, Shepard was out for two days, we don't know how long the process takes, but he may have been at least partially affected. Before he was out, he did not have any 'evidence' of any Reaper invasion. By the end, the only evidence was the vision he saw. It could be said that a vision is enough evidence, going by the beacon on Eden prime, but remember this is a Reaper beacon. It can control what you see and believe when you see that vision.
I also expected the Reaper fleet to show up by the end, but there was never any actual sight of them. They could have quite easily showed up, and blasted that asteriod into fragments, minimising damage and saving the Mass Relay.
The lack of choices is something that annoyed me about this DLC, but then I thought about it. The whole point of Indoctrination is that the subject is not given a choice in his actions, he is controlled by the Reapers. Shepard is being controlled, and does not have a voice over how the situation is delt with. It is the Reaper's will that he blows up this Relay, so he will.
Which leads to the question: why? Why do the Reapers want Shepard to destroy this Relay? Well all we know so far is that a war between Human and Batarians has been hinted at because of this event. We know that Reapers are specifically targeting Humans, so it is logical to assume that Reapers will want them as weak as possible.
My guess is that there is an overarching reason, a bigger reason, however. Perhaps this relay, being 'able to connect to anywhere in the galaxy' is significant. A rally point to strike back at the Reapers? They were pretty big on isolating the Protheans when they attacked: they shut down all the mass relays, so they couldn't rally for a counter attack. Again, I'm just speculating, it may be another more significant reason.
P.S Admiral Hacket's words at the end of the DLC make me wonder, too. He questions whether the Reapers were really a threat, and Shepard responds with absolute certainty. Hacket believes him, only because Shepard said so. It's possible Shepard was so certain because he was being controlled. Hacket even doesn't read the evidence, out of belief for Shepard, which leads me to believe that Shepard may not have even had any evidence. Maybe the datapad was even blank. The way the camera followed the data pad makes me think it's pretty significant.
Anyway, thoughts?
Modifié par TheSt3alth, 29 juin 2011 - 03:29 .





Retour en haut






