FERMi27 wrote...
I'd call a gamer old if he's >26. And very old if 30+.
I'd be old then and the last game I "geeked out" over was modern warfare 2. And now I have ME3 and MW3 to look itch over till they come out. I might also check out SWTOR
FERMi27 wrote...
I'd call a gamer old if he's >26. And very old if 30+.
Paul Sedgmore wrote...
@Whatever666343431431654324 - Depends on how you classify "old gamers" whether by physical age or length of time playing games. For instance I am 26 which isn't old but I have been playing games for over 20 years as I started as soon as I could pick up a controller so I have seen pretty much everything over the years
Modifié par javierabegazo, 30 juin 2011 - 01:19 .
marshalleck wrote...
I haven't geeked out over a new release in years. I'm interested in some new games coming up, but that interest is limited pretty much to watching videos of and about them only if someone posts a link. I've been gaming for like...a seriously long time, and I just feel like I've seen everything and nothing really new or exciting is happening. It's really incredibly, painfully obvious to me how formulaic the game industry is becoming, and it frustrates me when younger folks can't see it, because things are still new to them. Pretty jaded I guess.
Edit: lol Base Wars. OP and I are on the same page. I used to completely abuse my friends with that game.
Modifié par -Skorpious-, 30 juin 2011 - 01:21 .
javierabegazo wrote...
For all this talk of how "streamlined" and "mainstream" the game industry has been heading, there's been a great deal of improvement in so many areas.
The amount of people who have video games as entertainment has exponentially exploded, it's like any medium. You have action movies like Batman: Dark Knight and then you have action movies like Michael Bay's "The Island".
Sure it's easy to look back on the "glory days" but the cost of creating video games is astronomical these days, where you have actual cinematic designers, and so many complicated levels of gameplay that involve even longer sessions of Q+A, rather than just a team of 12 people. Whole soundtracks are made with orchestra arrangements, not just simple midi files. Instead of just a sprite of a face, and a blurb of text, there's entire digital acting scenes, like on Eden Prime, seeing Ashley talk about losing her squad.
As dear to my heart older games are, there are plenty of newer games that simply magnificent in presentation, like the Prologue of The Witcher 2, or Portal 2, or Starcraft 2. (lots of 2's)
javierabegazo wrote...
That, and Xenogears. (NOT Xenosaga)
Modifié par marshalleck, 30 juin 2011 - 01:26 .
Paul Sedgmore wrote...
@Whatever666343431431654324 - Depends on how you classify "old gamers" whether by physical age or length of time playing games. For instance I am 26 which isn't old but I have been playing games for over 20 years as I started as soon as I could pick up a controller so I have seen pretty much everything over the years. I agree with marshalleck that as the gaming industry becomes more mainstream most games are becoming too formulaic.
As for the last game I eagerly awaited; that would be ME1 everything else has been "looks cool add to list"
Modifié par Whatever666343431431654324, 30 juin 2011 - 01:24 .
marshalleck wrote...
javierabegazo wrote...
That, and Xenogears. (NOT Xenosaga)
That was an awesome game, and one of my favorite JRPGs.
I'll never forget Id's first appearance. Damn.
Modifié par TexasToast712, 30 juin 2011 - 01:32 .
I think that games becoming mainstream can only be a good thing for the industry as a whole, that isn't the problem. The problem is that the industry wants every game to be a big budget blockbuster, not every game needs to have hundreds of millions of dollars spent on them to resonate with the target audience. Take the movie industry as an example, they don't give a film like Love Actually the same budget as a film like Lord of the Rings because it doesn't need all of that money spent on it to make the film good for what it is and until the games industry realises this and the publishers change how they prioritise the games they release we will get the same basic ideas with only slight changes as that is what sells in big numbers.javierabegazo wrote...
For all this talk of how "streamlined" and "mainstream" the game industry has been heading, there's been a great deal of improvement in so many areas.
The amount of people who have video games as entertainment has exponentially exploded, it's like any medium. You have action movies like Batman: Dark Knight and then you have action movies like Michael Bay's "The Island".
Sure it's easy to look back on the "glory days" but the cost of creating video games is astronomical these days, where you have actual cinematic designers, and so many complicated levels of gameplay that involve even longer sessions of Q+A, rather than just a team of 12 people. Whole soundtracks are made with orchestra arrangements, not just simple midi files. Instead of just a sprite of a face, and a blurb of text, there's entire digital acting scenes, like on Eden Prime, seeing Ashley talk about losing her squad.
As dear to my heart older games are, there are plenty of newer games that simply magnificent in presentation, like the Prologue of The Witcher 2, or Portal 2, or Starcraft 2. (lots of 2's)
Having a larger pond will always mean that the level of mediocrity rises, because it's always in proportion. Back during the Nintendo days, there's thousands of titles that are so incredibly forgettable, with few redeeming qualities at all.
That said, one of the games that I was most excited for was Saga Frontier. That, and Xenogears. (NOT Xenosaga)
Grimmace wrote...
Wing Commander III
Wait, how far back are we going? Does that make me old?
Modifié par Therefore_I_Am, 30 juin 2011 - 01:42 .
javierabegazo wrote...
I guess what my point is, that there's always going to a lot of fluffer content, and then the rare gem. There are plenty of well, garbage sci-fi movies for example. And then there are really great ones, (Personal favorite among others is Gattica).
Even during the PC click adventure days, most games were formulaic. There were hundreds of baseball/football games on the Nintendo, that didn't really shine out from each other, same thing today, with yearly releases from Madden. Sports have always had a large crowd, so it was easy for those companies to sell those to the masses. Similar thing with first person shooters. But every now and then, it's ok to expect something marvelous. For me, that something marvelous in the FPS genre is Battlefield 3.
Paul Sedgmore wrote...
-snip-
And while I agree that every generation will have mediocre and poor games if they were budgeted properly based on the content and scope of the game the dud games would have less impact on the industry meaning more developers would try something different because they wouldn't take as much of a hit with it.
Therefore_I_Am wrote...
Grimmace wrote...
Wing Commander III
Wait, how far back are we going? Does that make me old?
Good lord, I'm glad I'm not the only one who remembers.
What about Monkey Island & Loom. Now if that's not a nostalgic blast from the past I don't know what is.
Modifié par Grimmace, 30 juin 2011 - 02:13 .