mrcrusty wrote...
They note at the beginning that the rankings aren't in accordance with their review scores, just a subjective ranking of what their editors feel are the best modern games.
Then it actualy makes sense.
mrcrusty wrote...
They note at the beginning that the rankings aren't in accordance with their review scores, just a subjective ranking of what their editors feel are the best modern games.
I forgot GTA 4. That game was far superior to ME2. If it was opinion then it shows that they don't have very good taste in games. Did Mirror's Edge even make the top 100? Did Shadow of the Colossus make it? LocoRoco? Final Fantasy XII? I think those games would be considered "modern".Cainne Chapel wrote...
Ya know Bioshock was fun... It really was. Great Even. But as with anything when it comes to video games, EVERYTHING is subjective. Look no further than these boards for proof of that. I have a wide and varied taste in games, YET as the person I am I LOVE wrestling games... hell i love wrestling. Yet I also love RPGs, TPS, FPS, Simulation and Strategy games.
Xenogears is one of my favorite RPGs of all time and I can still play it to this day, I also love almost every wrestling game... and GTA series games.
Point i'm trying to make Polka... not all tastes are the same nor need they be. I wouldnt expect you to like every game I like (and I love games that are terribly reviewed because they're fun to ME). Just like IGN is free to make their own lists independent of all their readers personal likes and preferences.
Clearly the words of someone who hasn't actually played Pacman CEsnowfox522 wrote...
Most people probably disagree with this but I think Enslaved Odyssey to the West should be in the top 100 especially with some of the ones they included in their.I mean Warhammer Dawn of war and I understand Pac-Man is a classic, but that's just it it's a classic. a flashy remake doesn't really deserve to be a modern game.
Polka14 wrote...
Really? You don't think IGN would have to be compensated in some way to somehow rate ME2 as the best "modern" game over literal masterpieces like BioShock??
Polka14 wrote...
Really? You don't think IGN would have to be compensated in some way to somehow rate ME2 as the best "modern" game over literal masterpieces like BioShock??squee365 wrote...
Polka14 wrote...
I wonder how much IGN was paid to rate Mass Effect 2 as the best??
Mass Effect 2 was likely not even the best game of 2010. ME2 is a decent game but it doesn't deserve to be compared to games like Assassin's Creed, BioShock, Okami, Mirror's Edge, Fallout 3, Gears of War (a superior third person shooter) and especially the first Mass Effect and many other games. It probably doesn't even deserve to be on that list at all. Even the uninspired Super Mario Galaxy is probably better.
It really is an insult to videogame fans.
Your tinfoil hat is showing.
You are right. MW2 was one of the worst games ever. A true nightmare and they call the #14 best. They don't seem to know much about decent games.Slidell505 wrote...
MW2 #14
The Witcher 2 only #75
Splinter Cell conviction is on the list and they're serious.
Yeah, **** this.I rarely agree with anything IGN puts out anyway. Come back when Giantbomb, GI or Destructoid have something like this.
The list is for the current generation of consoles, and PC games released in the same timeframe. That makes Mirror's Edge and LocoRoco the only eligable game you've listed. Mirror's Edge is on the list.Polka14 wrote...
I forgot GTA 4. That game was far superior to ME2. If it was opinion then it shows that they don't have very good taste in games. Did Mirror's Edge even make the top 100? Did Shadow of the Colossus make it? LocoRoco? Final Fantasy XII? I think those games would be considered "modern".Cainne Chapel wrote...
Ya know Bioshock was fun... It really was. Great Even. But as with anything when it comes to video games, EVERYTHING is subjective. Look no further than these boards for proof of that. I have a wide and varied taste in games, YET as the person I am I LOVE wrestling games... hell i love wrestling. Yet I also love RPGs, TPS, FPS, Simulation and Strategy games.
Xenogears is one of my favorite RPGs of all time and I can still play it to this day, I also love almost every wrestling game... and GTA series games.
Point i'm trying to make Polka... not all tastes are the same nor need they be. I wouldnt expect you to like every game I like (and I love games that are terribly reviewed because they're fun to ME). Just like IGN is free to make their own lists independent of all their readers personal likes and preferences.
Modern Warfare 2 isn't even on there, never mind at number 14...Slidell505 wrote...
MW2 #14
The Witcher 2 only #75
Splinter Cell conviction is on the list and they're serious.
Yeah, **** this.I rarely agree with anything IGN puts out anyway. Come back when Giantbomb, GI or Destructoid have something like this.
Mr.Kusy wrote...
ME2 PC, X360 - no DLC = score 9.3
ME2 PS3 with all DLC = score 9.5
I see. I only saw the relevant years 2005 or after. Well Mirror's Edge is better. So is Okami and that was remade so it counts and Biohazard 4 too.TheCrakFox wrote...
The list is for the current generation of consoles, and PC games released in the same timeframe. That makes Mirror's Edge and LocoRoco the only eligable game you've listed. Mirror's Edge is on the list.Polka14 wrote...
I forgot GTA 4. That game was far superior to ME2. If it was opinion then it shows that they don't have very good taste in games. Did Mirror's Edge even make the top 100? Did Shadow of the Colossus make it? LocoRoco? Final Fantasy XII? I think those games would be considered "modern".Cainne Chapel wrote...
Ya know Bioshock was fun... It really was. Great Even. But as with anything when it comes to video games, EVERYTHING is subjective. Look no further than these boards for proof of that. I have a wide and varied taste in games, YET as the person I am I LOVE wrestling games... hell i love wrestling. Yet I also love RPGs, TPS, FPS, Simulation and Strategy games.
Xenogears is one of my favorite RPGs of all time and I can still play it to this day, I also love almost every wrestling game... and GTA series games.
Point i'm trying to make Polka... not all tastes are the same nor need they be. I wouldnt expect you to like every game I like (and I love games that are terribly reviewed because they're fun to ME). Just like IGN is free to make their own lists independent of all their readers personal likes and preferences.
Modifié par Polka14, 02 juillet 2011 - 01:54 .
Polka14 wrote...
You are right. MW2 was one of the worst games ever. A true nightmare and they call the #14 best. They don't seem to know much about decent games.Slidell505 wrote...
MW2 #14
The Witcher 2 only #75
Splinter Cell conviction is on the list and they're serious.
Yeah, **** this.I rarely agree with anything IGN puts out anyway. Come back when Giantbomb, GI or Destructoid have something like this.
Modifié par strive, 02 juillet 2011 - 01:55 .
COD2 was the best and it is better then ME2.strive wrote...
Polka14 wrote...
You are right. MW2 was one of the worst games ever. A true nightmare and they call the #14 best. They don't seem to know much about decent games.Slidell505 wrote...
MW2 #14
The Witcher 2 only #75
Splinter Cell conviction is on the list and they're serious.
Yeah, **** this.I rarely agree with anything IGN puts out anyway. Come back when Giantbomb, GI or Destructoid have something like this.
MW2 wasn't even in the top 20, COD4(MW1) was #19, and it was by far the best COD IMO, and a fairly good shooter. (Dedicated Servers, Modded CAL/MLG servers, etc) Halo Reach getting #14 was fan service though.
TW2 being that low is bad though. I agree. Did DA:O place on the list anywhere?
Modifié par Varen Spectre, 02 juillet 2011 - 02:07 .
Modifié par Hellbound555, 02 juillet 2011 - 02:07 .
Mr.Kusy wrote...
Cainne Chapel wrote...
Yes they are video game press Mr. Kusy... that review games based on OMG... Opinion of said reviewer.
I'm not saying that IGN reviewers have to be objective because review is not objective from deffinition. I'm saying they are just making **** up as they go in a way so obvious it hurts. Look at their score for those games, IGN gave Portal 2 a score of 9.5 on x360, PC and PS3 while Mass Effect scores 9.5 only on PS3 (with 9.3 on other platforms). It seems weird that they make a ranking (as IGN as a whole, not single reviewer) and they place a game few good places above another game they gave a bigger score (again, as IGN as a whole, not a single reviewer)... not to mention Red Dead Redemption that scored even higher (and RDR:Undead Nightmare that they rated 10/10 on all platforms).
Correct me if I'm wrong but something smells like **** here.
Modifié par emanziboy, 02 juillet 2011 - 02:46 .
Miami Heat Fan wrote...
ME2 totally deserves it. Don't know why everybody is complaining........ Aren't these threads designed to SUPPORT the games?