Children soldiers for 3?
#1
Posté 03 juillet 2011 - 10:56
#2
Posté 03 juillet 2011 - 10:57
#3
Guest_The PLC_*
Posté 03 juillet 2011 - 10:59
Guest_The PLC_*
#4
Posté 03 juillet 2011 - 11:00
Modifié par VirtualStranger, 03 juillet 2011 - 11:02 .
#5
Posté 03 juillet 2011 - 11:01
#6
Posté 03 juillet 2011 - 11:02
#7
Posté 03 juillet 2011 - 11:04
#8
Posté 03 juillet 2011 - 11:05
#9
Posté 03 juillet 2011 - 11:08
#10
Posté 03 juillet 2011 - 11:16
In such a battle, it would be better to wait for the children to mature, before they would have to fight. Though I do think that they will have to fight, though.
#11
Posté 03 juillet 2011 - 11:19
Just because it's war doesn't mean we can throw every rule there is about the subject out the window.
#12
Posté 03 juillet 2011 - 11:31
Sure. would I be able to shoot them in the citadel??Destroy Raiden wrote...
So it's the end of the world as we know it, and that usually in ancient times entailed every able bodied man and young lad would be hauled out given a weapon and told to kill things. It's happened numerous times throughout history do you think any reaper ravaged worlds will deploy this tactic using young children and teens who're capable enough to understand who is the enemy and which way the hurting end of their weapon of choice is to be placed out against the onslaught? Should BW even employ this tactic to showcase the desperate straits civilizations should be in? We wanted kids they got one in should there be more in varied roles?
#13
Posté 03 juillet 2011 - 11:32
THIS. EVERY news outlet would have a field day over bioware showing children in war.Captain Crash wrote...
Udina sums this up best
#14
Posté 03 juillet 2011 - 11:32
if anything like that ever shows up on a game it will be a very big mistake.
just because we are playing through a virtual war it doesn't mean it has to include the lame mistakes that humanity does in reality at the moment.
for starters having children soldiers is totally uncivilized.
secondly giving the image of children carrying guns in a GAME THAT ACTUALLY HAS GUNS is not a good idea.
thirdly, Mass Effect introduces us a humanity that is more civilized, developed, evoluted, and it just stays there as a species. In reality humanity is so unstable and f**ked up that even if we ever meet aliens, they would laugh their guts out with how our politics and civilizations work.
don't mix reality with a scifi game, its really lame when people do that.
#15
Posté 03 juillet 2011 - 11:33
#16
Posté 03 juillet 2011 - 11:33
#17
Posté 03 juillet 2011 - 11:38
Inappropriate in games but perfectly ok in movies like in "enemy at the gates"??? <_<habitat 67 wrote...
Um no? That would be inappropriate.
why keep that atrocious double standard alive people? who cares if it isn't appropriate to some? there is nothing wrong with this media form portraying the same level of graphic violence towards children as movies. no?
#18
Posté 03 juillet 2011 - 11:45
Polka14 wrote...
Inappropriate in games but perfectly ok in movies like in "enemy at the gates"??? <_<
Different mediums of media and its a highly controversial topic anyway. Not really appropriate for a debate as its against forum rules and difference in opinion wont lead anywhere good regardless.
Modifié par Captain Crash, 03 juillet 2011 - 11:46 .
#19
Posté 03 juillet 2011 - 11:52
zweistein_J wrote...
that's a no.
if anything like that ever shows up on a game it will be a very big mistake.
just because we are playing through a virtual war it doesn't mean it has to include the lame mistakes that humanity does in reality at the moment.
for starters having children soldiers is totally uncivilized.
secondly giving the image of children carrying guns in a GAME THAT ACTUALLY HAS GUNS is not a good idea.
thirdly, Mass Effect introduces us a humanity that is more civilized, developed, evoluted, and it just stays there as a species. In reality humanity is so unstable and f**ked up that even if we ever meet aliens, they would laugh their guts out with how our politics and civilizations work.
don't mix reality with a scifi game, its really lame when people do that.
Last time I checked on the Sci-Fi channel's coverage of ME2, one of the interviewees (if I remember right, it was Ray Muzyka that mentioned this), science fiction is supposed to represent "the hopes and fears of humanity's future with the currently relevant topics?" Was "They Live" any less of a legitimate science-fiction movie just because it's talking about the big divide with the social classes? Was Starship Troopers any less of a legitimate science-fiction story because the Federation had facism?
#20
Posté 03 juillet 2011 - 11:54
who says its not "appropriate"??? sounds appropriate to me.Captain Crash wrote...
Polka14 wrote...
Inappropriate in games but perfectly ok in movies like in "enemy at the gates"??? <_<
Different mediums of media and its a highly controversial topic anyway. Not really appropriate for a debate as its against forum rules and difference in opinion wont lead anywhere good regardless.
#21
Posté 04 juillet 2011 - 12:02
zweistein_J wrote...
that's a no.
if anything like that ever shows up on a game it will be a very big mistake.
just because we are playing through a virtual war it doesn't mean it has to include the lame mistakes that humanity does in reality at the moment.
Humans have always done it. Child soldiers are not new.
zweistein_J wrote...
for starters having children soldiers is totally uncivilized.
War is uncivilised. Torture is uncivilised. Shall we cut out all references to both?
zweistein_J wrote...
secondly giving the image of children carrying guns in a GAME THAT ACTUALLY HAS GUNS is not a good idea.
Virtual children, carrying virtual weapons, shooting other virtual people with virtual bullets will not harm anyone.
zweistein_J wrote...
thirdly, Mass Effect introduces us a humanity that is more civilized, developed, evoluted, and it just stays there as a species.
Actually it shows humans pretty much as we are now, just with better tech. All the prejudice, greed etc are still there.
zweistein_J wrote...
don't mix reality with a scifi game, its really lame when people do that.
So.. remove everything in the game with a basis in reality? No more disease, no more fights, no more chain of command, no more alcohol, no more death?
Just FYI while I'm quoting you specifically, I'm not really singling you out, I just had to pick someone from the list of people against it, and it was you.
#22
Posté 04 juillet 2011 - 12:02
Polka14 wrote...
Sure. would I be able to shoot them in the citadel??Destroy Raiden wrote...
So it's the end of the world as we know it, and that usually in ancient times entailed every able bodied man and young lad would be hauled out given a weapon and told to kill things. It's happened numerous times throughout history do you think any reaper ravaged worlds will deploy this tactic using young children and teens who're capable enough to understand who is the enemy and which way the hurting end of their weapon of choice is to be placed out against the onslaught? Should BW even employ this tactic to showcase the desperate straits civilizations should be in? We wanted kids they got one in should there be more in varied roles?if not i would still approve. it would improve the atmosphere. children are always in war movies. they should be in games with war scenes too in my opinion.
No you can't shoot the kids! I was just watching the LOTR 2 and they were at hemls deep and they showed some 12 year olds getting outfitted but they never showed them actively in war and I thought about ME.
#23
Posté 04 juillet 2011 - 12:02
LPPrince wrote...
Good God no.
Yeah I agree, the children would be put to better use if we liqufied them to make our own reaper.
#24
Guest_InviolateNK_*
Posté 04 juillet 2011 - 12:03
Guest_InviolateNK_*
#25
Posté 04 juillet 2011 - 12:03




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut




