Children soldiers for 3?
#126
Posté 04 juillet 2011 - 04:17
Please don't sully my petals, Bioware.
#127
Guest_The Big Bad Wolf_*
Posté 04 juillet 2011 - 04:18
Guest_The Big Bad Wolf_*
AngelicMachinery wrote...
I think your automatically jumping to the worst extreme's possible.
I admit, I feel a little strong about this.
#128
Posté 04 juillet 2011 - 04:19
The Big Bad Wolf wrote...
There should be a limit to "free."
Will you at least admit that video games will never graduate to the big kid's pool because they're being controlled by the moral sensibilities of soccer moms?
#129
Posté 04 juillet 2011 - 04:19
slimgrin wrote...
My own sensibilities are like a delicate flower, the petals unsullied by any type of controversial subject matter.
Please don't sully my petals, Bioware.
#130
Posté 04 juillet 2011 - 04:20
slimgrin wrote...
My own sensibilities are like a delicate flower, the petals unsullied by any type of controversial subject matter.
Please don't sully my petals, Bioware.
Right into the gutter I went!
#131
Posté 04 juillet 2011 - 04:20
#132
Posté 04 juillet 2011 - 04:21
#133
Posté 04 juillet 2011 - 04:21
#134
Posté 04 juillet 2011 - 04:22
limiting freedom? that isn't right. <_The Big Bad Wolf wrote...
Polka14 wrote...
Yes to all those ideas. it is free expression. and it is really sad to see that Japan has a stronger free expression in the video game market then the USA. <_<The Big Bad Wolf wrote...
Polka14 wrote...
Yes if they want and think they have a market to appeal to. I'm in favor of child soldiers. all humans should be fighting the reapers and all other enemies. all humans that can carry a weapon would be needed if only to keep order while organizing resistance or retreat from Earth and human controlled colonies. there is no real reason to not show violent scenes against children.The Big Bad Wolf wrote...
AngelicMachinery wrote...
And this is why video games will NEVER be art.The developers will never have full disclosure to do as they please, everything will constantly be controlled by what people "think" is right in an interactive medium.
Okay, so video games should be able to show rape, beastility, and all that sick sh*t?
And racism?
So they can make a game where play as a KKK guy killing minorities just because they think there is a market?
A rape game as well? I think they have those in Japan but Japan is ****ed up anyway.
There should be a limit to "free."
i think children in me3 would be a good idea and I would support that.
#135
Posté 04 juillet 2011 - 04:24
krzimmer wrote...
When did this become about artistic vision and freedom of expression? We're talking about children getting killed for our entertainment, and that's supposed to be a part of of art and expression? I'm sorry but that's sick!
*sighs*
Since Mass Effect employed the written word.
Do you know how many times this mantra has been leveled at literature and fine art?
#136
Posté 04 juillet 2011 - 04:24
#137
Posté 04 juillet 2011 - 04:25
not in my opinion. it would be nice to see some die in battle. it would improve the atmosphere.krzimmer wrote...
When did this become about artistic vision and freedom of expression? We're talking about children getting killed for our entertainment, and that's supposed to be a part of of art and expression? I'm sorry but that's sick!
#138
Guest_The Big Bad Wolf_*
Posté 04 juillet 2011 - 04:25
Guest_The Big Bad Wolf_*
AngelicMachinery wrote...
The Big Bad Wolf wrote...
There should be a limit to "free."
Will you at least admit that video games will never graduate to the big kid's pool because they're being controlled by the moral sensibilities of soccer moms?
Video games are already in the "big kid's pool."
#139
Posté 04 juillet 2011 - 04:27
krzimmer wrote...
When did this become about artistic vision and freedom of expression? We're talking about children getting killed for our entertainment, and that's supposed to be a part of of art and expression? I'm sorry but that's sick!
The conversation occured because someone suggested that the implied death of a child in the Mass Effect Demo went to far.
#140
Guest_The Big Bad Wolf_*
Posté 04 juillet 2011 - 04:28
Guest_The Big Bad Wolf_*
Polka14 wrote...
limiting freedom? that isn't right. <_
i think children in me3 would be a good idea and I would support that.
US limits freedoms, too.
Limiting freedom is a good thing, because you will have people that take that freedom too far.
Modifié par The Big Bad Wolf, 04 juillet 2011 - 04:30 .
#141
Posté 04 juillet 2011 - 04:29
#142
Posté 04 juillet 2011 - 04:29
This +100LPPrince wrote...
Good God no.
#143
Posté 04 juillet 2011 - 04:30
The Big Bad Wolf wrote...
AngelicMachinery wrote...
The Big Bad Wolf wrote...
There should be a limit to "free."
Will you at least admit that video games will never graduate to the big kid's pool because they're being controlled by the moral sensibilities of soccer moms?
Video games are already in the "big kid's pool."
Not really, they're typically only taken seriously be people in the industry and gamers. It needs to mature if it's ever going to be seen as anything but a children's medium even with MATURE rated games they tend to water things down simply for the sake of the children.
#144
Posté 04 juillet 2011 - 04:31
I endorse this a thousand percent! MAKE IT HAPPEN BIOWARE .
===
Wait a minute - no I don't.
Not out of some moral squeamishness... but, what would it add to the story?
#145
Posté 04 juillet 2011 - 04:31
The Tookah wrote...
I doubt anyone is advocating the deaths of children on screen for our "entertainment". However it is realistic to assume that adolescents would be fighting. I would like to see adult games made for adults, instead of games watered down because foolish parents let underage kids have the games.
Adolescents make up the bulk of any army. I can remember an old professor of mine arguing with his wife about this. She was aghast at the loss of young life in the War on Terror. He'd served in Vietnam, and calmly reminded her it's the young guys who do the fighting in wars. There's a reason the draft in the U.S starts at 18. They're still impressionable, able to be molded. They're still kids.
Modifié par slimgrin, 04 juillet 2011 - 04:34 .
#146
Posté 04 juillet 2011 - 04:32
krzimmer wrote...
When did this become about artistic vision and freedom of expression? We're talking about children getting killed for our entertainment, and that's supposed to be a part of of art and expression? I'm sorry but that's sick!
It's not about "entertainment" in terms of "ooh, watching children die is fun!". It's about adding to the emotionally impact of the game. You know the world is desperate when it's resorting to child soldiers.
I thought realism was want people wanted in games. Perhaps I was wrong.
#147
Posté 04 juillet 2011 - 04:33
limiting freedom and free expression is never a good thing. it is evil. if a game is made with the option to kill children then don't play it if you don't like it. you can't "take a freedom too far". it is impossible.The Big Bad Wolf wrote...
Polka14 wrote...
limiting freedom? that isn't right. <_
i think children in me3 would be a good idea and I would support that.
US limits freedoms, too.
Limiting freedom is a good thing, because you will have people that take that freedom too far.
#148
Posté 04 juillet 2011 - 04:34
You are naive. Yes, there should be a limit to the freedoms we have because when people have total freedom the lines between right and wrong become increasingly blurred, and people will begin to lose their way and turn to imorality.Polka14 wrote...
limiting freedom? that isn't right. <_The Big Bad Wolf wrote...
Polka14 wrote...
Yes to all those ideas. it is free expression. and it is really sad to see that Japan has a stronger free expression in the video game market then the USA. <_<The Big Bad Wolf wrote...
Polka14 wrote...
Yes if they want and think they have a market to appeal to. I'm in favor of child soldiers. all humans should be fighting the reapers and all other enemies. all humans that can carry a weapon would be needed if only to keep order while organizing resistance or retreat from Earth and human controlled colonies. there is no real reason to not show violent scenes against children.The Big Bad Wolf wrote...
AngelicMachinery wrote...
And this is why video games will NEVER be art.The developers will never have full disclosure to do as they please, everything will constantly be controlled by what people "think" is right in an interactive medium.
Okay, so video games should be able to show rape, beastility, and all that sick sh*t?
And racism?
So they can make a game where play as a KKK guy killing minorities just because they think there is a market?
A rape game as well? I think they have those in Japan but Japan is ****ed up anyway.
There should be a limit to "free."
i think children in me3 would be a good idea and I would support that.
And certain people, teenagers and kids especialy, don't always have the mental capacity to judge for themselves what is acceptable. We NEED certain restrictions.
#149
Guest_The Big Bad Wolf_*
Posté 04 juillet 2011 - 04:34
Guest_The Big Bad Wolf_*
Polka14 wrote...
limiting freedom and free expression is never a good thing. it is evil. if a game is made with the option to kill children then don't play it if you don't like it. you can't "take a freedom too far". it is impossible.The Big Bad Wolf wrote...
Polka14 wrote...
limiting freedom? that isn't right. <_
i think children in me3 would be a good idea and I would support that.
US limits freedoms, too.
Limiting freedom is a good thing, because you will have people that take that freedom too far.
So why do we have laws then? Because people take freedom too far.
#150
Posté 04 juillet 2011 - 04:35




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut




