Although in other news....Vega is one ugly guy. That is all.
Modifié par Vamp44, 04 juillet 2011 - 10:45 .
Modifié par Vamp44, 04 juillet 2011 - 10:45 .
Eromenos wrote...
crusher1990 wrote...
I was browsing this portuguse forum and I found this pic. Not sure If it was posted here yet.
http://i1093.photobu...umes_1920-1.jpg
Edit:
N7 Pistol
N7 SMG
N7 Shotgun
N7 Sniper Rifle
Found higher res pics of N7 weapon pack.
A lot of us loved ME1 for its 80s-style of scifi exploration...but I, for one, wasn't asking them to put in nasty femullets and headbands, or shoulder-pads on wimmin. Gods. Space opera please, not soap opera.
This is even worse than Miranda and Samara combined. A female Marine grunt wearing a catsuit, high-heels, loose hair, and showing off cleavage. Ah, but shoulder-pads make it "ok" like they did for Samara. Oh wait, they didn't.
Kaidan's head looks pasted-on.
ETA: And a skirt, too? Fail.
TMA LIVE wrote...
Cerai13 wrote...
Someone With Mass wrote...
Cerai13 wrote...
Yeah, to me the new appearance for Ash appears to be the equivalent of a tasteful uniform. Something very much suited for a Lieutenant or ranking officer. Assuming her outfit reflects her rank as an officer (Lt), having her out on the front lines IMMEDIATELY as a soldier class is highly unlikely from an alliance perspective. She is no longer a peon who is disposable, though I am sure she would love to be there kicking ****. She may have even adjusted her fighting style to better suit that of a officer and spectre (infiltrator?) further legitimizing the design changes. What all "Ashley = Soldier" purists should be asking for is a good reason for her change in appearance through dialogue. What if she dislikes the outfit they gave her? There could be a whole ton of little details to make sense of a simple change in style. At any rate, armor may be her "loyalty" mission type unlock in ME3, these extras are just for cool guys who got the collectors edition!
Shepard is a Commander, and he's wearing armor.
It's like saying: I'm the CEO of this company, so I don't have to wear safety gear on the construction sites.
It's just stupid.
Still, I am pretty sure the CEO doesn't wear hardhats in his personal office. Clothing has to be situationally appropriate (and pants appropriate fo that matter!) and the point is we all know Ash, would not opt for this armor in a fight. She may however be wearing it, when a fight breaks out. It is reasonable to see her in this uniform, just a bit odd for shepard to insist she wear it
Eromenos wrote...
Cerai13 wrote...
Someone With Mass wrote...
Cerai13 wrote...
Yeah, to me the new appearance for Ash appears to be the equivalent of a tasteful uniform. Something very much suited for a Lieutenant or ranking officer. Assuming her outfit reflects her rank as an officer (Lt), having her out on the front lines IMMEDIATELY as a soldier class is highly unlikely from an alliance perspective. She is no longer a peon who is disposable, though I am sure she would love to be there kicking ****. She may have even adjusted her fighting style to better suit that of a officer and spectre (infiltrator?) further legitimizing the design changes. What all "Ashley = Soldier" purists should be asking for is a good reason for her change in appearance through dialogue. What if she dislikes the outfit they gave her? There could be a whole ton of little details to make sense of a simple change in style. At any rate, armor may be her "loyalty" mission type unlock in ME3, these extras are just for cool guys who got the collectors edition!
Shepard is a Commander, and he's wearing armor.
It's like saying: I'm the CEO of this company, so I don't have to wear safety gear on the construction sites.
It's just stupid.
Still, I am pretty sure the CEO doesn't wear hardhats in his personal office. Clothing has to be situationally appropriate (and pants appropriate fo that matter!) and the point is we all know Ash, would not opt for this armor in a fight. She may however be wearing it, when a fight breaks out. It is reasonable to see her in this uniform, just a bit odd for shepard to insist she wear it
Ashley was shown wearing the blue-version of this trash at the end of the E3 game footage. It is her combat outfit. There wouldn't be 2 versions of this if they didn't intend to implement it throughout the game.
Don't make excuses for this misogynistic cop-out. There are no good reasons at all for women like Ashley, Miranda, and/or Samara to ever go out in public like this. Fantasies about them relying on "sex-appeal" are BS considering how much easier it is for them to just kill their way straight-out towards their goals.
Made Nightwing wrote...
Miranda's jumpsuit certainly made more sense once they explained that aside from her shields, the little hexagonal shapes on her jumpsuit were filled with non-Newtonian gel that hardened into a ceramic like substance under fire. Since such substances exist in real life and are being tested by the military, I could actually accept it as being realistic.
Guest_PureMethodActor_*
Guest_Nyoka_*
Modifié par Nyoka, 04 juillet 2011 - 11:39 .
Eromenos wrote...
Cerai13 wrote...
Someone With Mass wrote...
Cerai13 wrote...
Yeah, to me the new appearance for Ash appears to be the equivalent of a tasteful uniform. Something very much suited for a Lieutenant or ranking officer. Assuming her outfit reflects her rank as an officer (Lt), having her out on the front lines IMMEDIATELY as a soldier class is highly unlikely from an alliance perspective. She is no longer a peon who is disposable, though I am sure she would love to be there kicking ****. She may have even adjusted her fighting style to better suit that of a officer and spectre (infiltrator?) further legitimizing the design changes. What all "Ashley = Soldier" purists should be asking for is a good reason for her change in appearance through dialogue. What if she dislikes the outfit they gave her? There could be a whole ton of little details to make sense of a simple change in style. At any rate, armor may be her "loyalty" mission type unlock in ME3, these extras are just for cool guys who got the collectors edition!
Shepard is a Commander, and he's wearing armor.
It's like saying: I'm the CEO of this company, so I don't have to wear safety gear on the construction sites.
It's just stupid.
Still, I am pretty sure the CEO doesn't wear hardhats in his personal office. Clothing has to be situationally appropriate (and pants appropriate fo that matter!) and the point is we all know Ash, would not opt for this armor in a fight. She may however be wearing it, when a fight breaks out. It is reasonable to see her in this uniform, just a bit odd for shepard to insist she wear it
Ashley was shown wearing the blue-version of this trash at the end of the E3 game footage. It is her combat outfit. There wouldn't be 2 versions of this if they didn't intend to implement it throughout the game.
Don't make excuses for this misogynistic cop-out. There are no good reasons at all for women like Ashley, Miranda, and/or Samara to ever go out in public like this. Fantasies about them relying on "sex-appeal" are BS considering how much easier it is for them to just kill their way straight-out towards their goals.
This is how all women should dress while in combat!Nyoka wrote...
A little recolor so she doesn't look exactly like Kaidan. I started making the lines pink but it was a bit ridiculous and red looked better to me.
Seboist wrote...
Yeah and why would they show Kaidan in combat armor and not Ashley? It's obviously her "armor".
Nyoka wrote...
A little recolor so she doesn't look exactly like Kaidan. I started making the lines pink but it was a bit ridiculous and red looked better to me.
Modifié par x0hn0th3r4nc0rx, 04 juillet 2011 - 11:17 .
Guest_The Big Bad Wolf_*
Nyoka wrote...
A little recolor so she doesn't look exactly like Kaidan. I started making the lines pink but it was a bit ridiculous and red looked better to me.
Modifié par MrFob, 04 juillet 2011 - 11:22 .
Guest_The Big Bad Wolf_*
Nyoka wrote...
A little recolor so she doesn't look exactly like Kaidan. I started making the lines pink but it was a bit ridiculous and red looked better to me.
Candidate 88766 wrote...
1st. 6 to 12 months has passed between the end of ME2 and the start of ME3, and the encounter on Horizon took place before that. Since then, she has become a Spectre - which she couldn't have been when she was on Horizon because, as you say, she was an Alliance marine then. Thats a pretty big change for someone to go through, and we have no idea what kind of Spectre she will become. A soldier wears massive armour because they are deployed to the front. They follow orders and generally just have to shoot at things. A Spectre approaches things in many ways - not just combat, but also with stealth and diplomacy. It may be that she has become a paragon-style Spectre, prepared to ask questions first and shoot only if required. She no longer has to follow orders, except from the Council. A Spectre can be delopyed long before any shooting is required, whereas a soldier is deployed when shooting is pretty much certain.Xeranx wrote...
Candidate 88766 wrote...
-snip-
Please tell me how character growth is equivalent to a change in protective attire in combat situations. Ashley states her dislike for Asari commando attire in combat in the first game.
Ashley states she's an Alliance Marine. "It's in my blood" being a defining comment if I ever heard one. This is done in ME2.
Stating that we don't know how she's changed in 3 years, thereby completely ignoring the above evidence found in ME2, seems like a move to make your statement and label people however you want because you don't agree with them.
If the time between ME2 and ME3 is a few months how do you think her change can be justified? How do you justify a departure from what one considered practical and safe to use in combat to embracing something that goes against everything she's known for?
2nd. No only has there been enough time for her character to change, but she also witnessed her old Commander brought back from the dead, saw a colony under her superivision attacked and has been promoted to Spectre. Thats enough to change anyone a significant amount.
3rd. Not only has Bioware stated those aren't final, but we also don't know that the outfit she is wearing is her combat gear.
4th. I've already argued why factually accurate combat gear is not essential for the style of science-fiction Mass Effect is, but people seem to have glazed over that. I shouldn't have put that first paragraph in my original comment.

