tomas2377 wrote...
Between Horizon (Ash in Phoenix armor) and ME3 are only a few month. Not enough time to change your entire character.
ME3 is 6-12 months after the end of ME2, Horizon took place before even that. Since then, Ash lost a significant number of colonists under her supervision, saw her old Commander back from the dead and got promoted to Spectre. Of course she will have changed. It'd be less realistic if she went through all of that and came out as exactly the same character.
A few more points I'd like to raise:
1. Shields do most of the work in combat as they deflect high-velocity impacts, and the main dangers on the battlefield are high-velocity impacts. Bullets, grenade shrapnel, directed energy weapons, all are protected against by the shields. As a soldier, Ash is more than capable of handling hand-tohand combat without the need of heavy armour.
2. As shown in the explanation of Miranda's outfit, material technology has advanced enough that even slim outfits can offer adequate protection in combat. But, as I said before, the shields do most of the work. Massive armour just isn't necessary. The lore describes bullet travel as insanely high, so no amount of metal or ceramic can offer anywhere near the protection that a shield will.
3. She is no longer just a soldier. A soldier is deployed to the front and does fighting. Nothing else. They need armour because they are essentially sentient bullet-sponges. As a Spectre, she will have a much wider variety of tasks than simply shooting and being shot at. Saying she should wear armour because she is a soldier is no longer true, she is something much more than a simple soldier.
4. It is NOT a skirt. It is like the Cerberus officer's outfit, or the ceremonial outfit worn by current US Marines. I'm sure they'd appreciate you telling them wearing a skirt. As beffitting someone now above the rank and file, Ash is wearing something more professional. She is no longer a frontline troop, she does not need hulking space marine armour.
5. Seriously, its the tiniest hint of cleavage. Its not like she's wearing a bikini. If you think that a woman showing a hint of cleavage means she cannot be a strong woman then that is sexist, plain and simple.
6. People saying it'll attract the 'CoD crowd': firstly, the sterotype you trying to evoke is the sterotype us gamers have been trying to shrug off for years. You're not helping. Demonising gamers for liking a certain game is what society has been doing for years to people that play any game. Just when we are getting past this, gamers seem to turn on themselves. Its ridiculous. Secondly, realistic military armour is far more likely to attract this 'CoD crowd' you hate so much.
7. The one thing I will agree with is that when in a vacuum or a hostile atmosphere the characters should have proper breathing equipment and all skin covered and I really hope that is rectified in ME3.
Edit: I'm sorry if I sound angry or offensive. That is not my intent. Its just that having 60 pages discussing a hint of cleavage seems like something that would happen on the Fox News forums, not BSN.
Modifié par Candidate 88766, 05 juillet 2011 - 02:01 .