108 réponses à ce sujet

[ipgd]

Xewaka wrote...

ipgd wrote...
Uh, wut? If anything, DA2 established Anders as an awful liar. The one time he lies outright, you can see straight through him. He couldn't keep up a convincing deception to save his life.

You, as the player, can. Hawke, the PC, is a different matter.

The very most that establishes is that Hawke is just bad at calling out liars (though, you can call him on his **** after you gather the potion ingredients). Anders is still such a god awful liar that you'd expect it to be patently obvious were he to make any other attempts to deceive Hawke.

[ademska]

KnightofPhoenix wrote...
Oh....I see.
Thanks for the mental image!

picture mileena's fatality and you've pretty much got the gist, tasty tasty

i am all about the mk refs lately man oh man

[ipgd]

ademska wrote...

KnightofPhoenix wrote...
Oh....I see.
Thanks for the mental image!

picture mileena's fatality and you've pretty much got the gist, tasty tasty

i am all about the mk refs lately man oh man

I'd pay to see him do that with the outfit and all.

[ipgd]

OOPS DOUBLE POST

Modifié par ipgd, 05 juillet 2011 - 12:21 .

[ademska]

ipgd wrote...
I'd pay to see him do that with the outfit and all.

i need to pay an artist cash dollars and force them to do my strappy purple spandex bidding. do you think i'll have to specify which way he tucks?

[upsettingshorts]

Well, if his joining was enthusiastic then his defense of it (and defense of spirits) is honest. If it was half-hearted or something he did only under duress, than such protestations are a coping mechanism.

I'm not sure I agree with the idea that they sort of backed into it, but it would make interpreting Anders' dialog interesting in that it'd be more about him convincing himself than it would be about convincing Merrill or Hawke or Fenris.

[FieryDove]

CulturalGeekGirl wrote...

Justice and Anders have those Awakenings banters (they're easy enough to look up) about striking out against his oppressors. They basically reveal that Anders doesn't fight the Templars because he fears death, doesn't want to do anything difficult, and basically believes that life isn't fair, so he has no real imperative to help others. Justice does have the strength, doesn't fear death, and believes that an inherent obligation does exist. 

I agree with this except Justice did fear death, he says so I think it was after we downed the Baroness. Yes?

I do wonder if they can be seperated at this point. Even moreso I wonder if they would want too. They seem to be in accord in the friendship path and more at odds in the rivalry path which might determine this? Just rambling...

[Stanley Woo]

Closed by OP request.

End of line.