Aller au contenu

Photo

Can we not have Paragon=Best Outcome (In terms of story and content)?


1768 réponses à ce sujet

#676
Mykel54

Mykel54
  • Members
  • 1 180 messages
It could be argued that saving the ascension is a decent tactical decision too, if you want to kill sovereign then the ascension is one mothership that has a hell of a firepower. You know that in the final battle it doesn´t happen, but shepard may think that the ascension firepower was needed to kill sovereign. It is not only a question of saving the council or not, it is also about whenever you think the ascension is needed to fight agaisnt sovereign or if you think that it is useless and not worth the effort into saving it.

#677
Guest_Saphra Deden_*

Guest_Saphra Deden_*
  • Guests

Mykel54 wrote...

It could be argued that saving the ascension is a decent tactical decision too,


If you want to make-up facts about the battle to support your argument, then yeah, it could. People have been doing it since the game came out.

#678
Praetor Knight

Praetor Knight
  • Members
  • 5 772 messages

Saphra Deden wrote...

daqs wrote...

I'm sorry, I don't understand what you mean by this.  If I had to guess, I'd say that you seem to think that "saving the Council" and "destroying Sovereign" are mutually exclusive goals.


They are to someone who doesn't already know the outcome. Without meta-gaming Shepard doesn't know what will happen. All he knows is that saving the DA is risky because it might leave the fleet too weak to take Sovereign down. If that happens then the Reapers come through and all sentient life is extinguished.

That should have been obvious though.


Nevertheless, Shepard might have had some political savvy to see the value in at least trying to save the DA.

The convos with Al-Jilani, the Rear Admiral and that dude on Feros at least demonstrates a quality for such consideration by Shepard in ME1.

Edit: I forgot to qualify the quality, with enough charm / intimidate skill Shepard could.

Modifié par Praetor Shepard, 09 juillet 2011 - 09:06 .


#679
Guest_Saphra Deden_*

Guest_Saphra Deden_*
  • Guests

Praetor Shepard wrote...

Nevertheless, Shepard might have had some political savvy to see the value in at least trying to save the DA.


Oh yeah, politics will be really helpful when Sovereign opens the relay, gaining control of the relay network in the process, and promptly kills you.

#680
Dave of Canada

Dave of Canada
  • Members
  • 17 484 messages

Mykel54 wrote...

It could be argued that saving the ascension is a decent tactical decision too, if you want to kill sovereign then the ascension is one mothership that has a hell of a firepower.


It's half destroyed, you hear the warning where it says most of it's systems are offline and it's shields are about to go down. Any firepower it could provide would be less from potential losses eliminating the Geth fleet focusing their fire on the Destiny Ascension.

#681
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 425 messages

Saphra Deden wrote...

Praetor Shepard wrote...

Nevertheless, Shepard might have had some political savvy to see the value in at least trying to save the DA.


Oh yeah, politics will be really helpful when Sovereign opens the relay, gaining control of the relay network in the process, and promptly kills you.


Yeah totally that wasn't happening when those 8 extra ships were hitting Sovereign for 0 damage either? Those eight ships mustve had magical Thannix cannons that did invisible damage. :lol: 

Let's not pretend those ships were gonna help. The only thing that helped was Sovereign dropping 100 IQ Points. 

That said I RP my Shep as genre savvy. He had enough sense to realize massive ship from 50K years ago probably wasn't gonna be hurt by mere dreadnought fire. There's a reason the Reapers kill them at a certain level of advancement. 

Modifié par Ryzaki, 09 juillet 2011 - 09:09 .


#682
Praetor Knight

Praetor Knight
  • Members
  • 5 772 messages

Saphra Deden wrote...

Praetor Shepard wrote...

Nevertheless, Shepard might have had some political savvy to see the value in at least trying to save the DA.


Oh yeah, politics will be really helpful when Sovereign opens the relay, gaining control of the relay network in the process, and promptly kills you.


True but if you survive, you gain political capital with the Council and the Alliance. But then Shepard "dies", and that is more or less reset in ME2.

#683
Dave of Canada

Dave of Canada
  • Members
  • 17 484 messages

Ryzaki wrote...

Let's not pretend those ships were gonna help. The only thing that helped was Sovereign dropping 100 IQ Points. 


How does Shepard know this?

Modifié par Dave of Canada, 09 juillet 2011 - 09:09 .


#684
Guest_Saphra Deden_*

Guest_Saphra Deden_*
  • Guests

Praetor Shepard wrote...

True but IF you survive, you gain political capital with the Council and the Alliance. But then Shepard "dies", and that is more or less reset in ME2.



#685
Ieldra

Ieldra
  • Members
  • 25 189 messages

Saphra Deden wrote...

daqs wrote...
I'm sorry, I don't understand what you mean by this.  If I had to guess, I'd say that you seem to think that "saving the Council" and "destroying Sovereign" are mutually exclusive goals.


They are to someone who doesn't already know the outcome. Without meta-gaming Shepard doesn't know what will happen. All he knows is that saving the DA is risky because it might leave the fleet too weak to take Sovereign down. If that happens then the Reapers come through and all sentient life is extinguished.

That should have been obvious though.

Exactly.

Judging from only the info Shepard has at the time, saving the DA is a risk they cannot afford.

The problem is that any benefit from saving the Council is contingent on the survival of the galaxy, which at this point is not assured.

Modifié par Ieldra2, 09 juillet 2011 - 09:11 .


#686
Someone With Mass

Someone With Mass
  • Members
  • 38 560 messages
Yeah, let's kill off the three leaders of the races that might be able to help us in the future when it comes to political decisions and such. That's smart.

Modifié par Someone With Mass, 09 juillet 2011 - 09:10 .


#687
nhsk

nhsk
  • Members
  • 1 382 messages
Well as the paragon way of seing things, you don't go for your own political capital but rather that of humanity...

#688
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 425 messages

Dave of Canada wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...

Let's not pretend those ships were gonna help. The only thing that helped was Sovereign dropping 100 IQ Points. 


How does Shepard know this?


By being genre savvy. 

Really a 50K ship isn't gonna march in with a few ships at its head unless it has an ace up its sleeve. The Citadel was one such ace but it needs to get there first and the thing is fully aware that Shepard is chasing it. It's woefully unconcered about that matter. Why would it not care unless it knew it had nothing to be concerned about? My Shep pretty much figured the Reapers reaped them because it knew it would be impervious to there weapons unless a weakspot was hit. 

Modifié par Ryzaki, 09 juillet 2011 - 09:13 .


#689
TobyHasEyes

TobyHasEyes
  • Members
  • 1 109 messages

Saphra Deden wrote...

Someone With Mass wrote...

They weren't? Yeah. Go ahead and believe that. You are really naive if you think Cerberus would give up a advantage they have over the Alliance, to the Alliance.


They helped get the first Normandy built, remember? They also saved the Council.


 Not getting into this debate, but just curious about Cerberus' involvement in the first Normandy, where is that information from?

#690
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 425 messages
..gah I hate when BSN does this.

#691
Dave of Canada

Dave of Canada
  • Members
  • 17 484 messages

Someone With Mass wrote...

Yeah, let's kill off the three leaders of the races that might be able to help us in the future when it comes to political decisions and such. That's smart.


Let's risk destroying the entire galaxy to save three political figures that would mean absolutely nothing if the galaxy is destroyed. That's smart too!

#692
Ieldra

Ieldra
  • Members
  • 25 189 messages

Someone With Mass wrote...
Yeah, let's kill off the three leaders of the races that might be able to help us in the future when it comes to political decisions and such. That's smart.

It doesn't matter if you're dead. And "everyone dies" is exactly the risk you run with saving the DA. Defeating Sovereign is, at this point in time, the only goal that matters.

Modifié par Ieldra2, 09 juillet 2011 - 09:12 .


#693
Guest_Saphra Deden_*

Guest_Saphra Deden_*
  • Guests

Someone With Mass wrote...

Yeah, let's kill off the three leaders of the races that might be able to help us in the future when it comes to political decisions and such. That's smart.


If Sovereign wins you won't have to worry about that because there will be no future.

#694
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 425 messages
I really wish people stopped acting like the loss of eight *HUMAN* ships were seriously going to affect the battle with Sovereign. It wasn't. Even while in character it wasn't going to.  Shepard's only hope is when Sovereign assumes direct control and is slain leaving himself in KO (or dead...not sure which). 

Modifié par Ryzaki, 09 juillet 2011 - 09:15 .


#695
Guest_Saphra Deden_*

Guest_Saphra Deden_*
  • Guests

TobyHasEyes wrote...

Not getting into this debate, but just curious about Cerberus' involvement in the first Normandy, where is that information from?


It comes from EDI after her blocks are removed.

Cerberus apparently pressured the Alliance to co-develop the Normandy with the turians so as to gain the chance to study turian design practices.

It's how Cerberus was able to build the Normandy on their own: they already had the blue prints. No "stealing" necessary.

#696
Barquiel

Barquiel
  • Members
  • 5 848 messages

Ieldra2 wrote...

Someone With Mass wrote...
Yeah, let's kill off the three leaders of the races that might be able to help us in the future when it comes to political decisions and such. That's smart.

It doesn't matter if you're dead. And "everyone dies" is exactly the risk you run with saving the DA. Defeating Sovereign is, at this point in time, the only goal that matters.


What if the Geth ships which you failed to destroy prevent you from defeating Sovereign?

#697
Dave of Canada

Dave of Canada
  • Members
  • 17 484 messages

Ryzaki wrote...

Really a 50K ship isn't gonna march in with a few ships at its head unless it has an ace of its sleeve.


Those few ships was an entire geth fleet, enough to devastate the Council fleet. Sovereign killed how many Council ships during the invasion of the Citadel? 3-4? Everything else was the Geth, which devastated the Council fleet and left them in a position weak enough that humans had the superior military might afterward.

#698
Praetor Knight

Praetor Knight
  • Members
  • 5 772 messages

Saphra Deden wrote...

Praetor Shepard wrote...

True but IF you survive, you gain political capital with the Council and the Alliance. But then Shepard "dies", and that is more or less reset in ME2.


There's a reason Shepard is made a Spectre, Nihlus seemed to notice something after all, to bother testing Shepard in the first place.

And Shepard seemed capable of exceeding expectations without a proper tutor.

#699
Guest_Saphra Deden_*

Guest_Saphra Deden_*
  • Guests

Barquiel wrote...

What if the Geth ships which you failed to destroy prevent you from defeating Sovereign?


They won't because they'll be too busy fighting the Council fleet.

That's the point. Let the DA die and let the Citadel fleet soak up all the casualities.

#700
Guest_Saphra Deden_*

Guest_Saphra Deden_*
  • Guests

Praetor Shepard wrote...

There's a reason Shepard is made a Spectre...


Spectres are mortal and fallable just like everyone else.