Aller au contenu

Photo

biggest character disappiontments! *cough*vega's look*cough*


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
104 réponses à ce sujet

#76
tomas2377

tomas2377
  • Members
  • 332 messages

100k wrote...

tomas2377 wrote...

lol If you read all my posts in this thread than you would know that I am not judging Ash's character. I am only judging Ash's model for ME3.

I like the ME1 Ash a lot. Love that character. I even loved the ME1 Ash model but what drew me to that character was her character.

Please read more before you post and attack someone for standing up for the other gender.


I didn't mean for that entire post to be directed at you personally. Just this bit: Women on this forum: I get that you are fed up with how the media sexualizes women. Hey, it sucks, but it just isn't gonna go away. But blaming BW is absolutely wrong.

Sorry for the confusion.




That's ok. No harm done. Image IPB

Sometimes we all just get worked up when we care about someone (Ash's character) and something (ME3).

#77
Duskeyboy

Duskeyboy
  • Members
  • 69 messages

The Big Bad Wolf wrote...

Duskeyboy wrote...

well i realized bioware shat on a good majority of  their fans and a few more things; lets discuss

-No new LI
-James vega's look
-Wrex most likely wont be a permanent squady
-gave ashley a nose job and gave a feministic look
-vega might disappiont
- pre-chosen permanent squadies

I'm pretty sure i wont like how they handle wrex, because they pissed in his ear and told him it was rain in ME2, so im pretty sure they're goin to sh*t on him from such a height he'll think god did it himself.

list your disappointments



Let me point this out first.

1. Already confirmed that there will be new LIS.
2. He's designed as he was described.
3. No one is permanent in ME3.
4. No, she just got a new outfit.
5. The game is not out yet, I think we should hold judgment until then.
6. Like I said, no one is permanent.

The only disappointment I have is  the fact that ME3 is released on March 6, 2012. I wanted it this year.

Edited for grammar and missing words


since your going to be funny and correct me AND make mistakes AND go back and edit and still left them their I gotta say something!

3. okay then so liara just pops up there to romance your babes, while garrus gets there to do some calibrations and steal money from you for his sick mother, and ashley stops to gloat. BULLSH*T there are permanent squaddies.
4.So ashley is just wearing a new wig she found at the citadel, even though she detested the feminist look-BULLSH*T.
5. I am not going to bottle up all my thoughts about a game that was supposed to be out this year, but instead it got pushed to next year, especially when thats what forums are for.
6. now your just being redundant.

Please don't try to correct if your going to fail like this guy did.

#78
Vertigo_1

Vertigo_1
  • Members
  • 5 934 messages
I believe when he corrected you he was referring to this:

http://twitter.com/#...114300813328385
"Is Tali a permanent squadmember in ME3?"

"Tali will be able to join your team, but nothing's permanent in #ME3 - it's a story of full-scale war, with lots of twists."

Modifié par Vertigo_1, 05 juillet 2011 - 03:34 .


#79
Duskeyboy

Duskeyboy
  • Members
  • 69 messages

Vertigo_1 wrote...

I believe when he corrected you he was referring to this:

http://twitter.com/#...114300813328385
"Is Tali a permanent squadmember in ME3?"

"Tali will be able to join your team, but nothing's permanent in #ME3 - it's a story of full-scale war, with lots of twists."


I've been getting corrected by alot of people and none of them showed me anything to back up what they say, but i realized neither did I so i stayed quiet, but I couldn't let him slide especially with the ashley comments. Thanks for showing me.

Image IPB

i love this ashley, this is what i want.

#80
Guest_The Big Bad Wolf_*

Guest_The Big Bad Wolf_*
  • Guests

Duskeyboy wrote...

The Big Bad Wolf wrote...

Duskeyboy wrote...

well i realized bioware shat on a good majority of  their fans and a few more things; lets discuss

-No new LI
-James vega's look
-Wrex most likely wont be a permanent squady
-gave ashley a nose job and gave a feministic look
-vega might disappiont
- pre-chosen permanent squadies

I'm pretty sure i wont like how they handle wrex, because they pissed in his ear and told him it was rain in ME2, so im pretty sure they're goin to sh*t on him from such a height he'll think god did it himself.

list your disappointments



Let me point this out first.

1. Already confirmed that there will be new LIS.
2. He's designed as he was described.
3. No one is permanent in ME3.
4. No, she just got a new outfit.
5. The game is not out yet, I think we should hold judgment until then.
6. Like I said, no one is permanent.

The only disappointment I have is  the fact that ME3 is released on March 6, 2012. I wanted it this year.

Edited for grammar and missing words


since your going to be funny and correct me AND make mistakes AND go back and edit and still left them their I gotta say something!

3. okay then so liara just pops up there to romance your babes, while garrus gets there to do some calibrations and steal money from you for his sick mother, and ashley stops to gloat. BULLSH*T there are permanent squaddies.
4.So ashley is just wearing a new wig she found at the citadel, even though she detested the feminist look-BULLSH*T.
5. I am not going to bottle up all my thoughts about a game that was supposed to be out this year, but instead it got pushed to next year, especially when thats what forums are for.
6. now your just being redundant.

Please don't try to correct if your going to fail like this guy did.


Lol how did I fail? By pointing things out that you obviously failed to see? I think you failed. And how is any of that even funny?

3. Casey Hudson said no one is permanent. I think I trust him more than some guy with internet access saying it's BS.
4. Casey Hudson said in a tweet that we can give her armor to wear. ANd when did she say that she hated the look?
5. But going off about something you know absolutely nothing about is just stupid.
6. No, you just failed.

#81
100k

100k
  • Members
  • 3 152 messages
Now, I noticed a few times that EPIC GAMES' character Anya have been posted on these forums as a "why-couldn't-Ash-be-more-like-this" template.

Image IPB

First off, let me say that I am VERY impressed with how Epic handles the personal appearance of their female characters. Like many of the Ash doubters, I was convinced that Gears 3's women would be highly sexualized. I was wrong.

It is, however, very important to note the difference between the kind of games we're talking about here.

Gears of War has the very audience that Bioware is interested in grabbing. Shooter fans. I do NOT have any problem with this, but it is the truth.

Part of this is because Gears of War is strictly a shooter. Its great for casual play. However, the other big part of this is multiplayer, which is more of a social gathering. ME doesn't have this. It is an RPG without MP (thank god), and as such, like most SP only games, will suffer from it (necessary evil). Couple this with LIVE's vast popularity --bolstered by the 360s price, and Halo&CODs popularizing of the "social shooter" genre-- and you have a recipe for success.

Bioware doesn't get this luxury. Now, I think that both teams make stellar games, but BW's games appeal to a more refined (if that's the right word) audience. Wanna spend 40 hours crafting your own story? Play a BW game. Wanna spend 10 hours playing a more casual and violent shooter? Play an Epic game.

The point is, this only solidifies why BW has to some times make what I call "mask character models". Miranda's big breasts, Shepard's gravelly face, and an alien on the cover of ME2 are there not to wink knowingly at fans, but to attract the most valuable and risky audience of all: new consumers with no idea of what ME is.

If Ash is in a silly pose on the ME3 cover in tight armor, it's not because the developers and marketers particularly idealize women. It's because they fully recognize the harsh reality that boys love video games. And no matter how mature one guy can be, there always be an urge to take a second glance at the cover with boobs than the cover with just a hero and a planet.

Now, a girl walking into the video game section at Target might buy a game. But, as a producer, you have to accept that the boy absolutely will.

Gears has their audience, and come September, that audience will come flooding in, brining not only fans, but millions of eager newcomers. They can make Anya look practical on the box art, posters, hell even a damn porno if they wanted. They don't need to worry about scraping up anyone. That's the power of casual games, when you can have guns without boobs, and estimate no valuable fluctuations in sales.

Modifié par 100k, 05 juillet 2011 - 03:48 .


#82
pvpgirl

pvpgirl
  • Members
  • 268 messages
That could just mean that they have the ability to perma-die, like the Virmire Ash/Kaidan thing. "Yeah their your squadmate, but they could die, so that's not permanent" kind of thing.

Note:  That's my personal opinion, hope that the phrasing was put that way on purpose to stir up the community.  Still crossing my fingers that Kaidan will be attached at my hip for the whole of ME3.

Modifié par mcomommy, 05 juillet 2011 - 03:48 .


#83
Duskeyboy

Duskeyboy
  • Members
  • 69 messages

The Big Bad Wolf wrote...

Duskeyboy wrote...

The Big Bad Wolf wrote...

Duskeyboy wrote...

well i realized bioware shat on a good majority of  their fans and a few more things; lets discuss

-No new LI
-James vega's look
-Wrex most likely wont be a permanent squady
-gave ashley a nose job and gave a feministic look
-vega might disappiont
- pre-chosen permanent squadies

I'm pretty sure i wont like how they handle wrex, because they pissed in his ear and told him it was rain in ME2, so im pretty sure they're goin to sh*t on him from such a height he'll think god did it himself.

list your disappointments



Let me point this out first.

1. Already confirmed that there will be new LIS.
2. He's designed as he was described.
3. No one is permanent in ME3.
4. No, she just got a new outfit.
5. The game is not out yet, I think we should hold judgment until then.
6. Like I said, no one is permanent.

The only disappointment I have is  the fact that ME3 is released on March 6, 2012. I wanted it this year.

Edited for grammar and missing words


since your going to be funny and correct me AND make mistakes AND go back and edit and still left them their I gotta say something!

3. okay then so liara just pops up there to romance your babes, while garrus gets there to do some calibrations and steal money from you for his sick mother, and ashley stops to gloat. BULLSH*T there are permanent squaddies.
4.So ashley is just wearing a new wig she found at the citadel, even though she detested the feminist look-BULLSH*T.
5. I am not going to bottle up all my thoughts about a game that was supposed to be out this year, but instead it got pushed to next year, especially when thats what forums are for.
6. now your just being redundant.

Please don't try to correct if your going to fail like this guy did.


Lol how did I fail? By pointing things out that you obviously failed to see? I think you failed. And how is any of that even funny?

3. Casey Hudson said no one is permanent. I think I trust him more than some guy with internet access saying it's BS.
4. Casey Hudson said in a tweet that we can give her armor to wear. ANd when did she say that she hated the look?
5. But going off about something you know absolutely nothing about is just stupid.
6. No, you just failed.




3. he said "Nothings permanent..." its a general statement-FAIL
4. When visiting the citadel for the first time in ME1 as maleshep, go over to the balcony and press a to view, she will make a statement, if you resond the right way it will come off as to her as flirting, my proof is in what she says after that. (I'm not going to quote it directly sense don't trust some guy with internet access - FAIL
5. ah yes, 'a forum being used to state ones opinions openly to gather a few other opinions to create a discussion between individuals' we have dismissed those claims- FAIL
6. I know it's hard to believe , but you did, you should accept it. -FAIL


Image IPB

#84
Guest_The Big Bad Wolf_*

Guest_The Big Bad Wolf_*
  • Guests

Duskeyboy wrote...
3. he said "Nothings permanent..." its a general statement-FAIL
4. When visiting the citadel for the first time in ME1 as maleshep, go over to the balcony and press a to view, she will make a statement, if you resond the right way it will come off as to her as flirting, my proof is in what she says after that. (I'm not going to quote it directly sense don't trust some guy with internet access - FAIL
5. ah yes, 'a forum being used to state ones opinions openly to gather a few other opinions to create a discussion between individuals' we have dismissed those claims- FAIL
6. I know it's hard to believe , but you did, you should accept it. -FAIL


Image IPB



3. He said that when questioned about squadmates. You have failed yet again.
4. Failure to provide proof.
5. Opinions on absolutely nothing?
6. dumb post is dumb.

Your entire post is just fail.

Image IPB

#85
Duskeyboy

Duskeyboy
  • Members
  • 69 messages

The Big Bad Wolf wrote...

Duskeyboy wrote...
3. he said "Nothings permanent..." its a general statement-FAIL
4. When visiting the citadel for the first time in ME1 as maleshep, go over to the balcony and press a to view, she will make a statement, if you resond the right way it will come off as to her as flirting, my proof is in what she says after that. (I'm not going to quote it directly sense don't trust some guy with internet access - FAIL
5. ah yes, 'a forum being used to state ones opinions openly to gather a few other opinions to create a discussion between individuals' we have dismissed those claims- FAIL
6. I know it's hard to believe , but you did, you should accept it. -FAIL


Image IPB



3. He said that when questioned about squadmates. You have failed yet again.
4. Failure to provide proof.
5. Opinions on absolutely nothing?
6. dumb post is dumb.

Your entire post is just fail.

*snip*




Instead of going back and forth with a vegabond who doesn't know how to explain himself, I'm going to be the bigger man and end this, here's my proof

#86
VegasVance

VegasVance
  • Members
  • 345 messages

PnXMarcin1PL wrote...
Edit:
What do you think about that ?
http://social.biowar...ndex/7793557/69
Image IPB


Insert me gusto face, that is the best I've seen. 
B)

#87
DaveExclamationMarkYognaut

DaveExclamationMarkYognaut
  • Members
  • 578 messages

100k wrote...

The point is, this only solidifies why BW has to some times make what I call "mask character models". Miranda's big breasts, Shepard's gravelly face, and an alien on the cover of ME2 are there not to wink knowingly at fans, but to attract the most valuable and risky audience of all: new consumers with no idea of what ME is.

If Ash is in a silly pose on the ME3 cover in tight armor, it's not because the developers and marketers particularly idealize women. It's because they fully recognize the harsh reality that boys love video games. And no matter how mature one guy can be, there always be an urge to take a second glance at the cover with boobs than the cover with just a hero and a planet.


What's that one sci-fi series that is based on a long thoughtful/exploratory single-player experience? Oh yeah, Metroid. And the female protagonist dresses like this:
Image IPB
Except in that one game that sucked and was an unmitigated commerical disaster.

Or take another game that is taking the fight to Mass Effect on its own turf: Deus Ex 3.
Here are some female characters from that:
http://deusex.wikia....Yelena_Federova
http://deusex.wikia....wiki/Megan_Reed
http://deusex.wikia....ki/Eliza_Cassan
http://deusex.wikia....i/Faridah_Malik

The only thing close to Bioware-style objectification thing is Eliza Cassan's silly rennaisance-style collar thing, and even then that's pretty tame by Bioware standards.

The cover of Human Revolution looks like this, incidentally. Not an objectified woman in sight. So yeah, I think we shouldn't be making excuses for Bioware.

#88
100k

100k
  • Members
  • 3 152 messages

DaveExclamationMarkYognaut wrote...

100k wrote...

The point is, this only solidifies why BW has to some times make what I call "mask character models". Miranda's big breasts, Shepard's gravelly face, and an alien on the cover of ME2 are there not to wink knowingly at fans, but to attract the most valuable and risky audience of all: new consumers with no idea of what ME is.

If Ash is in a silly pose on the ME3 cover in tight armor, it's not because the developers and marketers particularly idealize women. It's because they fully recognize the harsh reality that boys love video games. And no matter how mature one guy can be, there always be an urge to take a second glance at the cover with boobs than the cover with just a hero and a planet.


What's that one sci-fi series that is based on a long thoughtful/exploratory single-player experience? Oh yeah, Metroid. And the female protagonist dresses like this:
Image IPB
Except in that one game that sucked and was an unmitigated commerical disaster.

Or take another game that is taking the fight to Mass Effect on its own turf: Deus Ex 3.
Here are some female characters from that:
http://deusex.wikia....Yelena_Federova
http://deusex.wikia....wiki/Megan_Reed
http://deusex.wikia....ki/Eliza_Cassan
http://deusex.wikia....i/Faridah_Malik

The only thing close to Bioware-style objectification thing is Eliza Cassan's silly rennaisance-style collar thing, and even then that's pretty tame by Bioware standards.

The cover of Human Revolution looks like this, incidentally. Not an objectified woman in sight. So yeah, I think we shouldn't be making excuses for Bioware.


I'm glad you came to this thread. Saves me the effort of copy/pasting.

Samus is iconic. Changing her appearance on a box art would be damaging. EVERYONE recognizes her.

Halo is iconic. The femSpartans can dress in whatever heavy or light attire the developer wants, because Halo's popularity, as stated before as being bolstered by the demand for the "social shooter", is through the roof. Probably only outdone by Blizzard and Infinity Ward. 

ME hasn't been around for 10 years or more yet. Maybe in another 10 years it'll be as recognizable as Halo or Metroid. Until then, it has to try and gain as many new fans as possible to bolster sales. 

The Witcher is an interesting example. Yes, Triss and the other female characters are fairly strong (I never said otherwise). But then the game makes sexball cards to balance it out. In the end, I think Witcher's approach to sex is great (why should devs be afraid of nudity in addition to strong characters), but also a little too male idealistic (Gerald sleeps with half the female cast). Plus, its a foreign developer! When  they shipped Witcher to America, the PC game was censored. Female character models were redone so that we couldn't see the nudity. 

And by pointing out Miranda's ass or Samara's ******, you're ignoring fully covered Tali, Kasumi, Ashley, ARMORED Miranda, Armored femShep, etc etc. It's just as bad to ignore ME for what it does. 

And to shut this whole thing down about Ash being too sexual--

Casey just confirmed that Ash will be wearing full armor (+ helmet) for ME3. What we're seeing is a CE variant, chosen as a default NPC outfit.
B)

Modifié par 100k, 05 juillet 2011 - 04:58 .


#89
DaveExclamationMarkYognaut

DaveExclamationMarkYognaut
  • Members
  • 578 messages

100k wrote...

And by pointing out Miranda's ass or Samara's ******, you're ignoring fully covered Tali, Kasumi, Ashley, ARMORED Miranda, Armored femShep, etc etc. It's just as bad to ignore ME for what it does. 

And to shut this whole thing down about Ash being too sexual--

Casey just confirmed that Ash will be wearing full armor (+ helmet) for ME3. What we're seeing is a CE variant, chosen as a default NPC outfit.
B)


I am very happy to hear that Ash has outfit choices other than Malibu Boomstick Barbie :)

But honestly, I don't think that a game being strong on some levels eliminates weaknesses on other levels. For instance, I like Kasumi's or Liara's character designs, but I don't think that erases objectification in other characters. I'm the same way about Witcher - it has a few exceptionally strong female characters by video game standards, but (for an example from Witcher 1) that does not excuse it for giving you a pokemon card for sleeping with them - that's still an incredibly sexist design decision. To it's credit, CDPR removed the sex cards from the second game based on fan criticism, and hopefully Bioware will do the same thing with stuff like Jack's strategically positioned belt.

#90
TexasToast712

TexasToast712
  • Members
  • 4 384 messages

Welsh Inferno wrote...
Stop being stupid BSN.

HAH!, Thats asking alot from the community.

Modifié par TexasToast712, 05 juillet 2011 - 05:30 .


#91
100k

100k
  • Members
  • 3 152 messages

DaveExclamationMarkYognaut wrote...

I am very happy to hear that Ash has outfit choices other than Malibu Boomstick Barbie :)

But honestly, I don't think that a game being strong on some levels eliminates weaknesses on other levels. For instance, I like Kasumi's or Liara's character designs, but I don't think that erases objectification in other characters. I'm the same way about Witcher - it has a few exceptionally strong female characters by video game standards, but (for an example from Witcher 1) that does not excuse it for giving you a pokemon card for sleeping with them - that's still an incredibly sexist design decision. To it's credit, CDPR removed the sex cards from the second game based on fan criticism, and hopefully Bioware will do the same thing with stuff like Jack's strategically positioned belt.


And yet you still claimed that this:

Image IPB

leading to this (multiple times with multiple characters in a single playthrough):

http://www.chip.pl/c...g/image_preview

Is better than this:

Image IPB

Leading to this

Image IPB

I completely understand your points, but you'll have to forgive me if I'm having a hard time understanding your original implied thesis: Series off the top of my head that objectify women less than Bioware games at this point: Halo, Gears of War, Elder Scrolls, and Witcher. In other words, Bioware is going waaaaay to far with the sexualization.

Modifié par 100k, 05 juillet 2011 - 05:41 .


#92
TexasToast712

TexasToast712
  • Members
  • 4 384 messages

100k wrote...

Now, I noticed a few times that EPIC GAMES' character Anya have been posted on these forums as a "why-couldn't-Ash-be-more-like-this" template.

Image IPB

First off, let me say that I am VERY impressed with how Epic handles the personal appearance of their female characters. Like many of the Ash doubters, I was convinced that Gears 3's women would be highly sexualized. I was wrong.

It is, however, very important to note the difference between the kind of games we're talking about here.

Gears of War has the very audience that Bioware is interested in grabbing. Shooter fans. I do NOT have any problem with this, but it is the truth.

Part of this is because Gears of War is strictly a shooter. Its great for casual play. However, the other big part of this is multiplayer, which is more of a social gathering. ME doesn't have this. It is an RPG without MP (thank god), and as such, like most SP only games, will suffer from it (necessary evil). Couple this with LIVE's vast popularity --bolstered by the 360s price, and Halo&CODs popularizing of the "social shooter" genre-- and you have a recipe for success.

Bioware doesn't get this luxury. Now, I think that both teams make stellar games, but BW's games appeal to a more refined (if that's the right word) audience. Wanna spend 40 hours crafting your own story? Play a BW game. Wanna spend 10 hours playing a more casual and violent shooter? Play an Epic game.

The point is, this only solidifies why BW has to some times make what I call "mask character models". Miranda's big breasts, Shepard's gravelly face, and an alien on the cover of ME2 are there not to wink knowingly at fans, but to attract the most valuable and risky audience of all: new consumers with no idea of what ME is.

If Ash is in a silly pose on the ME3 cover in tight armor, it's not because the developers and marketers particularly idealize women. It's because they fully recognize the harsh reality that boys love video games. And no matter how mature one guy can be, there always be an urge to take a second glance at the cover with boobs than the cover with just a hero and a planet.

Now, a girl walking into the video game section at Target might buy a game. But, as a producer, you have to accept that the boy absolutely will.

Gears has their audience, and come September, that audience will come flooding in, brining not only fans, but millions of eager newcomers. They can make Anya look practical on the box art, posters, hell even a damn porno if they wanted. They don't need to worry about scraping up anyone. That's the power of casual games, when you can have guns without boobs, and estimate no valuable fluctuations in sales.

Pfft..... instead of sexualize her they went the complete and total opposite direction and turned her into a 15 year old potty mouth trapped in a woman's body.<_<

#93
100k

100k
  • Members
  • 3 152 messages

TexasToast712 wrote...
Pfft..... instead of sexualize her they went the complete and total opposite direction and turned her into a 15 year old potty mouth trapped in a woman's body.<_<


Gears of War doesn't have that much swearing in it. Hell, Killzone and Bulletstorm had a hell of a lot more. 

:mellow:

#94
100k

100k
  • Members
  • 3 152 messages
Objectification lies within the dehumanizing living things for your own enjoyment. One who claims that Mass Effect objectifies women is either completely mad, hasn't played the game, or is from Fox News.

#95
DaveExclamationMarkYognaut

DaveExclamationMarkYognaut
  • Members
  • 578 messages

100k wrote...

DaveExclamationMarkYognaut wrote...

I am very happy to hear that Ash has outfit choices other than Malibu Boomstick Barbie :)

But honestly, I don't think that a game being strong on some levels eliminates weaknesses on other levels. For instance, I like Kasumi's or Liara's character designs, but I don't think that erases objectification in other characters. I'm the same way about Witcher - it has a few exceptionally strong female characters by video game standards, but (for an example from Witcher 1) that does not excuse it for giving you a pokemon card for sleeping with them - that's still an incredibly sexist design decision. To it's credit, CDPR removed the sex cards from the second game based on fan criticism, and hopefully Bioware will do the same thing with stuff like Jack's strategically positioned belt.


And yet you still claimed that this:

Triss wearing medieval clothes

leading to this (multiple times with multiple characters in a single playthrough):

Triss not wearing medieval clothes

Is better than this:

Jack wearing what Jack wears

Leading to this

Jack wearing what Jack wears.

I completely understand your points, but you'll have to forgive me if I'm having a hard time understanding your original thesis.


My point is that it's nice if the characters wear clothes that people in the real world would actually wear (vs. clothes designed for sex appeal for the player) regardless of whether they take those clothes off to have sex. Witcher 2 is a borderline example, anyway - Saskia, for instance, gets on my nerves because she wears plate armor with cleavage. But it's still (based on my playthrough - I hear the path I didn't take has a couple pretty sexist character designs) a game that didn't annoy me nearly as much as Mass Effect 2 and DA:O.

The larger point is that you have games that are pushing the envelope with how much nudity you can get away with in a video game, games that are hyper-macho gorefests targeted at dudebros, and games that are so mainstream that they created the mainstream - and all of these games feature designs for their female characters that are far less demeaning than what we let Bioware get away with. You also a game (Human Revolution) that is competing directly with Mass Effect 3, and seems to take its female characters much more seriously in terms of visual design. That strikes me as somewhat of an issue.

#96
Eurhetemec

Eurhetemec
  • Members
  • 815 messages
I don't have a big problem with BioWare objectifying/sexing-up certain characters to some extent, but they could do with balancing it out more. Certainly Jacob makes up for for Miranda, and one could claim Thane makes up for Samara, but then Jack tips the whole thing over, with an outfit that is neither cool nor practical. There are better ways to show off one's full-body tattooes. Somehow even nudity would have been more tasteful than Jack's outfit.

What I do think is problematic is taking a character who isn't at all sexed-up, like Ash, and giving her armour, at least in her AA look, which has a quasi-miniskirt and quasi-suspenders on it, and which definitely doesn't look like the sort of armour a Soldier-class character would be wearing. That's really silly and unhelpful. I hope it's all the result of an ill-conceived design decision and that it doesn't look at all like that in-game (just shorten the jacket-skirt and delete the suspender-cord-like seams, I say).

I'd also just like to say that the idea that GoW3 is a "casual game" and ME3 is a "serious game" is a total and utter joke. It's completely intellectually bankrupt. Devoid of meaning. They're both games played with the same degree of seriousness by a fairly similar (but not the same) audience, only ME3 has less of an excuse because it's got a larger female audience.

Still, my main concern with ME3 remains our GoW-like friend, James Vega. He looks like an escapee from "every video game ever", and if he's Dudebro-bait, would have the potential to be intensely annoying. BW claim he's there for new customers, which is slightly frightening, because it seems that if so, judging this book by it's cover, they're trying to plumb the FPS/3PS market, and that bodes ill for ME's future, frankly. The only relief from this worry is that this is BioWare, and they've never forced me to endure a Dudebro-appeal character, and have always provided fun characters instead. Plus, if he's the or a M/M LI, how Dudebro can he be? Not very, I'd imagine.

#97
DaveExclamationMarkYognaut

DaveExclamationMarkYognaut
  • Members
  • 578 messages

Eurhetemec wrote...
Still, my main concern with ME3 remains our GoW-like friend, James Vega. He looks like an escapee from "every video game ever", and if he's Dudebro-bait, would have the potential to be intensely annoying. BW claim he's there for new customers, which is slightly frightening, because it seems that if so, judging this book by it's cover, they're trying to plumb the FPS/3PS market, and that bodes ill for ME's future, frankly. The only relief from this worry is that this is BioWare, and they've never forced me to endure a Dudebro-appeal character, and have always provided fun characters instead. Plus, if he's the or a M/M LI, how Dudebro can he be? Not very, I'd imagine.


I've personally got my fingers crossed that Vega's gonna be a gay dudebro-type character, because that would be, if not the most original thing in the world, an original and entertaining way to play with established character archtypes - which is something that the Mass Effect team is pretty good at. After all, really all you need to do to make a dudebro character gay is to make the homoerotic subtext into text haha.

#98
Sticky Controller

Sticky Controller
  • Members
  • 460 messages
@The Big Bad Wolf and DuskeyBoy
Okay, posting fail pics and trying to one up each other is childish. You both have your opinions. No one is right until the game comes out (or unless we have a great Dev question and answer). If I could Anderson punch you, I would.

#99
100k

100k
  • Members
  • 3 152 messages

DaveExclamationMarkYognaut wrote...

My point is that it's nice if the characters wear clothes that people in the real world would actually wear (vs. clothes designed for sex appeal for the player) regardless of whether they take those clothes off to have sex. Witcher 2 is a borderline example, anyway - Saskia, for instance, gets on my nerves because she wears plate armor with cleavage. But it's still (based on my playthrough - I hear the path I didn't take has a couple pretty sexist character designs) a game that didn't annoy me nearly as much as Mass Effect 2 and DA:O.


Sexy design =/= sexist design. Miranda, Jack, Samara, they all wear what they wear for a reason. Hence, you have your "realism".

The girls in Ninja Gaiden are wearing sexist designed clothing, and are completely objectified. There is no context for why they wear what they wear. There is no practicality for it. There is no character behind their eyes to help us overlook it (or very little character). They wear bondage and fetish outfits, with absurd proportions. 

Miranda wears a catsuit because she uses it to enhance her looks. This gives her a (lore) advantage in situations where individuals need to be outsmarted. She also gets an alternate armor that looks excellent, so anyone not comfortable with her catsuit can have her wear that.

Samara wears a relatively revealing outfit, because it is her Justicar attire. She wears that outfit mostly in Asari space. Now, I could be wrong, but it seems to me that Asari (being A sexual) probably don't care one way or another about seeing another Asari's breasts. Attraction between Asari probably lies in other physical and hormonal traits. Hence, it is probable that her suit is open to relieve sweat, in the similar fashion to how a man (even armored) can go sleeveless to relieve sweat. We can assign similar reasoning for Saskia. As a designer this is great, because it allows you to maintain a sexy and visually appealing design, without sacrificing the lore of the universe you helped create.

Jack was probably wearing something slightly heavier before she was put in prison. Unfortunately, Jack was brutally raped while on the Purgatory by the guards, then the inmates. I always imagined them ripping her clothes off. She got pissed (understandably), killed a bunch of people (or tried) and got a time out in cryo. They probably didn't put more clothes on her in the event that she might hide something on her person. I imagined that the Normandy only had Cerberus clothes, and I don't think she'd want to wear those. But she gets two extra outfits that completely cover her up.
In the end though, I find that Jack is so tattooed that it hardly matters that she starts off shirtless. She looks like she's wearing clothing, because she doesn't get that feminine "fleshy" look that I associate with the female figure. 

The larger point is that you have games that are pushing the envelope with how much nudity you can get away with in a video game, games that are hyper-macho gorefests targeted at dudebros, and games that are so mainstream that they created the mainstream - and all of these games feature designs for their female characters that are far less demeaning than what we let Bioware get away with. You also a game (Human Revolution) that is competing directly with Mass Effect 3, and seems to take its female characters much more seriously in terms of visual design. That strikes me as somewhat of an issue.


I still think you're putting too much emphasis on appearances, that's all. What HR is going to be great at isn't something superficial like well dressed characters. It'll be well portrayed characters. Same with ME3.

Also, when I think of the dude-bros (believe me, I hate them all), I don't think of Gears of War, Halo, or Witcher. These games may have many of the traits that appeal to dude-bros, like gore and nudity, but they also have fairly mature stories (or stories that try to be mature). They have their own lore, expanded universes, and character conflicts that you don't find in dude-bro games. Bulletstorm, Duke Nukem, and COD I see as dude bro games. They are just silly, loudmouthed, foul, and entertaining. They appeal to the "I drink beer and fart on my couch while making fun of homosexuals after a football game" sort of people. COD is a little more mature, but it is the victim of its own success in my opinion, as it is the head of the "social shooter" genre, and has many buyers who won't even touch the SP.

Which brings me to my final question. If so many big budget developers are now portraying their female characters in a less degrading manner--hell, a great manner it looks like, and only a few games are portraying females as sexual objects, then isn't our medium growing up?

#100
DaveExclamationMarkYognaut

DaveExclamationMarkYognaut
  • Members
  • 578 messages

100k wrote...

Sexy design =/= sexist design.


I agree with that - I don't have a huge problem with a sexualized character when it is consistent with the setting, the story, and accompanied by strong characterization that is consistent with said sexualization. In other words, when the character is strong and the sexualized aspect of the character feels like it fits. Example: The Prince and Farah from Sands of Time are in my mind examples of doin it rite, because although they don't wear much, it makes sense in their "Arabian Nights via Western translation"-esque setting, and the general lack of clothing isn't inconsistent with their (very strong) characterization. Triss (in Witcher 2, at least) is another example for me, because she's only overly sexualized when she's having sex, and is done so in a manner that is consistent with her (once again strong) character. However, I have serious issues with sexism in that game including with Triss, which I'll get to when I discuss similar problems I have with Mass Effect 2.

100k wrote...

Miranda wears a catsuit because she uses it to enhance her looks. This gives her a (lore) advantage in situations where individuals need to be outsmarted. She also gets an alternate armor that looks excellent, so anyone not comfortable with her catsuit can have her wear that.


The problem with Miranda is that her outfit isn't really situational like that - it's basically what she wears around the office, into battle, and so on. So it comes off to me as if the "advantage for honeytrap-type stuff" is more of a post-hoc rationalization than an element of the game that actually makes sense.

There are two examples from Witcher 2 that relate to the Miranda issue. The first is the whole "dat ass" situation. The camera in Mass Effect 2 loves Miranda's backside. This is incredibly obnoxious when it shows up. Witcher 2 does the same thing with Triss during sex scenes (although I only noticed it during sex scenes), and it's similarly annoying. So objectifiying a character can also be the result of things other than what that character is wearing.

The second example is specifically re: the whole "femme fatale" thing. Take Ves from Witcher 2. A little bit of cleavage, but generally dressed in a non-sexualized fashion consistent with her character. There's a part in the game where she does basically the same thing Miranda supposedly does with her catsuit (use it to pull a femme fatale thing) and she changes clothes to do that, then changes back. The Ves way is, IMHO, better, because a character should not dress for 99% of the game like they're doing some sort of femme fatale thing they do for 1% (or in Miranda's case, 0%) of the game.

100k wrote...

Samara wears a relatively revealing outfit, because it is her Justicar attire. She wears that outfit mostly in Asari space. Now, I could be wrong, but it seems to me that Asari (being A sexual) probably don't care one way or another about seeing another Asari's breasts. Attraction between Asari probably lies in other physical and hormonal traits. Hence, it is probable that her suit is open to relieve sweat, in the similar fashion to how a man (even armored) can go sleeveless to relieve sweat. We can assign similar reasoning for Saskia. As a designer this is great, because it allows you to maintain a sexy and visually appealing design, without sacrificing the lore of the universe you helped create.


I don't buy that. Plate armor doesn't need ventilation right over a direct shot at your heart from above and to the right, which is why plate armor was historically not built with cleavage. And  Samara could zip up her jacket and apply the Asari equivalent of anti-perspirant if she's super worried about sweating all the time. Let's not pretend either of those designs were about anything other than cleavage in the minds of the devs.

100k wrote...

Jack was probably wearing something slightly heavier before she was put in prison. Unfortunately, Jack was brutally raped while on the Purgatory by the guards, then the inmates. I always imagined them ripping her clothes off. She got pissed (understandably), killed a bunch of people (or tried) and got a time out in cryo. They probably didn't put more clothes on her in the event that she might hide something on her person. I imagined that the Normandy only had Cerberus clothes, and I don't think she'd want to wear those. But she gets two extra outfits that completely cover her up.
In the end though, I find that Jack is so tattooed that it hardly matters that she starts off shirtless. She looks like she's wearing clothing, because she doesn't get that feminine "fleshy" look that I associate with the female figure.


If I were raped and cryo-frozen and the people responsible died in the course of my escape, the first thing I'd do is take a shower and the second thing I'd do is put on some clothes. Just saying.

But yeah, I agree with you that because of the tattoos Jack could get away with wearing less clothes than most other characters. But the belt is stretching it too far.

100k wrote...

Which brings me to my final question. If so many big budget developers are now portraying their female characters in a less degrading manner--hell, a great manner it looks like, and only a few games are portraying females as sexual objects, then isn't our medium growing up?


Well, I don't think only a few games are portraying females as sex objects, but I agree with you that it's cool that many aren't. I mostly just want Bioware the visual designers to catch up with Bioware the writers on this area.

Modifié par DaveExclamationMarkYognaut, 05 juillet 2011 - 09:24 .