Aller au contenu

Photo

Kaidan, Ashley, James & Liara - Alternative Costumes V.2


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
808 réponses à ce sujet

#451
Nashiktal

Nashiktal
  • Members
  • 5 584 messages

littlezack wrote...

 As a guy who reads a lot of comic books, the concept of a woman in somewhat..revealing clothing isn't new to me. And yes, some of them are made up for pure titallation, but others still - Power GIrl, Wonder Woman, Black Canary, et cetera - can dress like they do and still come across as competent, strong, intelligent women, so long as they've got the right writer handling the job. 

Just because Ashley's in that dress, doesn't mean she automatically devolves into some mindless fawn. To assume that or anything close is just silly.


You probably didn't read through the thread, understandable considering the size but still.

Short version? Complaint is that Ashley is doing things she said she wouldn't and this makes people worried they might have changed her character, especially since her writer left.

The design change complaints lead into that, the arguments about women being over sexualized got spilled over into it,.

#452
sissysouthpaw

sissysouthpaw
  • Members
  • 207 messages

littlezack wrote...

DaveExclamationMarkYognaut wrote...

littlezack wrote...

 As a guy who reads a lot of comic books, the concept of a woman in somewhat..revealing clothing isn't new to me. And yes, some of them are made up for pure titallation, but others still - Power GIrl, Wonder Woman, Black Canary, et cetera - can dress like they do and still come across as competent, strong, intelligent women, so long as they've got the right writer handling the job. 

Just because Ashley's in that dress, doesn't mean she automatically devolves into some mindless fawn. To assume that or anything close is just silly.


There's also the issue of mixed messages. You can have writing that tells you that a character is intelligent and competent, and visuals that tell you she's a sex object. But honestly, this debate has ocurred over and over again, and the question is less "does objectification exist?" (answer: yes) and more "how should people portray female characters in media?"


Hm. You make a civil argument. I will engage you, sir.

While I understand the argument against it, I think we do ourselves an injustice by moving over to the other extreme - surely, there is a limit, but I don't think every single woman in a videogame should dress like a nun. Some women prefer to dress sexy. That's their thing. People are more than what they dress - ultimately, it's what they do and how they act that defines them. I think we do ourselves a grave disservice by looking at a character design and immediately dismissing the character based on looks alone. The entire package should be taken into account.




This isn't about people wanting all women to dress like nuns. This is about having women being situationally appropriate. Like, say... love scene -> little to no clothes, battlefield -> armor. *gasp* Just like the guys. Some women want to be sexy but there's a time and a place for that. Also, being sexy is not only about showing cleavage or wearing heels. I'd love to see the devs being more creative about this.

#453
darthnick427

darthnick427
  • Members
  • 3 785 messages
I think it might be time to go back and save ashley's hot ass on virmire. Kaiden can die i don't really give a **** about him. I only saved him because he had the same VA as Carth from KOTOR and because Ash came off as a racist. But then i played it again and realized she's just cautious of aliens and hasn't worked with them before. Image IPB ........Why the hell did I ever save Kaiden?

Modifié par darthnick427, 06 juillet 2011 - 08:09 .


#454
ThePwener

ThePwener
  • Members
  • 2 652 messages
Aweasome. Vega looks like the human form of Garrus.... which is badass.

#455
mineralica

mineralica
  • Members
  • 3 310 messages
Well, Ashley already has "jacket outfit" and is promised to have full body armour. Already two variants of outfit which isn't recolours.

How many other characters will have two independent sets of clothing/armour? Only Ashley, only whose who had
extremely light outfit in ME2 and Ashley, only humans and asari, only LI (erm, what about Tali then?), everyone?

Another question, are that outfits are location - specific (lighter version only available on Normandy and other safe places, only armour for dangerous locations) or it's like catsuit Miranda vs. armoured Miranda - everything available, you just switch?

Modifié par mineralica, 06 juillet 2011 - 08:21 .


#456
ThePwener

ThePwener
  • Members
  • 2 652 messages
Well, I doubt Kaidan will wear that incredibly cumbersome armor while onboard. I think they will be like Shepard this time around.

#457
ZLurps

ZLurps
  • Members
  • 2 110 messages

Siansonea II wrote...

Vertigo_1 wrote...

twitter.com/#!/CaseyDHudson/status/88476268357619712

"For the next set of #MassEffect3 screenshots, what are you hoping to see most? Ashley in armor? A first look at James Vega? Something else?"


I tweeted for the first time in years just to respond to this.


Just made my first Tweet ever.

I hope we get to see Ash in armour soon. Even Casey has said that what we have seen this far are just alternate armours for CE I feel bit uneasy, because making radically different armour design is likely to require also new character model. I just don't know how much is possible with Ash model we have seen this far.

In general, while Star Trek miniskirts were sign of those times and I enjoyed certain work out scene in TNG www.youtube.com/watch and I can see why introducing Seven of Nine character helped the ratings of ST Voyager, though it I was tired of Star Trek already and didn't watch it myself.
IMO, what we have seen from Ash this far is thing from the past and this is Mass Effect, not Star Trek (thank Lord!) or old B-film anyway.

#458
PinkDiamondstl

PinkDiamondstl
  • Members
  • 1 099 messages
My god James is freakin ugly man.

#459
elfdwarf

elfdwarf
  • Members
  • 810 messages
doubt that all companions(3) we get in game
i don't know if vega going look like that, it's only concept art
remember merrill had two concept art
on one of mass effect 3 trailers who was that guy using black widow

#460
Guest_PureMethodActor_*

Guest_PureMethodActor_*
  • Guests
Honestly, I'd tweet Casey with my vote for seeing armored Ashley, but I also hate Twitter with a passion and very few things could make me get a twitter. This situation isn't one of those things, though.

Can someone tweet my request, say something like "BSN user PureMethodActor requests armored Ash" or something?

PWEEEEEESE

:crying:

lol would be really funny if someone actually did this, but I know obviously its not gonna happen :P

#461
mineralica

mineralica
  • Members
  • 3 310 messages

ThePwener wrote...

Well, I doubt Kaidan will wear that incredibly cumbersome armor while onboard. I think they will be like Shepard this time around.

I hope so (Kaidan wearing that armour constantly => two very embarrassed Shepards for me), but Garrus was fine wearing his armour all the way for both games except romance scene.
In another hand, several squadmates wears casual-looking armour: Liara, for example, has a hybrid of armour and lab coat. Will she also has casual outfit and if so, what it will like? Dress a la Liara from vanilla ME2/end of LotSB? Another lab coat? The same goes for Jack and - possibly - Miranda

#462
Mr. Gogeta34

Mr. Gogeta34
  • Members
  • 4 033 messages
Ash looks slightly odd in the alternate costume pic. This shot of her looks better to me:

Image IPB

#463
PinkDiamondstl

PinkDiamondstl
  • Members
  • 1 099 messages

PureMethodActor wrote...

Honestly, I'd tweet Casey with my vote for seeing armored Ashley, but I also hate Twitter with a passion and very few things could make me get a twitter. This situation isn't one of those things, though.

Can someone tweet my request, say something like "BSN user PureMethodActor requests armored Ash" or something?

PWEEEEEESE

:crying:

lol would be really funny if someone actually did this, but I know obviously its not gonna happen :P

Already Tweeted it for you...:bandit:

#464
Mathias

Mathias
  • Members
  • 4 305 messages

Eromenos wrote...

DaringMoosejaw wrote...

Eromenos wrote...

Infestation wrote...

Eromenos wrote...

Oh, I know. I'm here for teh azure of course. Just so long as it's Kaidan's azure.

In the meantime, you shouldn't be so casual about referring to women as hos. I always clarify myself when I use it around this place. I use it as a critique against BioWare's unjust targeting of women in a way that is hurtful to women just so BioWare can pimp them out to dudebros.

Case in point with the way BioWare depicted women characters' "alternative outfits" for this Collector's Edition. Why should they be singled out for this crap? Tsk.


Fact: Sex sells.


Fact: That's an excuse for treating women exclusively as toys.


If people made more money stuffing women in featureless power armor instead of form-fitting attire, you can bet your ass they'd do that instead regardless of whether they think women are toys or not. But they don't, so they won't.


I...must've missed the part where you announced your stake as a BioWare share-holder and/or employee and thus your own vested interest in protecting these debated products from which you must profit by rendering women into sex-toys? Well, perhaps you don't actually have tangible personal investment in this. Simply playing up to capitalistic exploitation for its own sake is the safe and normal thing to do, mebbe. But not for me. Which is why I perceive the harm in segregating Ashley's depictions for misogynistic purposes much more keenly than the promise of any impersonal profit margins that would make me feel unclean. Whether or not I'm a BioWare stock-holder. Which I'm not.

Seems a few other posters referenced Samus for your benefit already. My thanks to them...I'll continue tomorrow! :ph34r:


No, don't continue. You've already been warned a couple times to take it to another board.

#465
Welsh Inferno

Welsh Inferno
  • Members
  • 3 295 messages
Wait what, that guy is STILL going on about that stuff... my god.



PinkDiamondstl wrote...

My god James is freakin ugly man.


Take that back! He's a beast!

#466
Mathias

Mathias
  • Members
  • 4 305 messages

Welsh Inferno wrote...

Wait what, that guy is STILL going on about that stuff... my god.



PinkDiamondstl wrote...

My god James is freakin ugly man.


Take that back! He's a beast!


Yea his quest continues.

#467
crimzontearz

crimzontearz
  • Members
  • 16 788 messages
I do not even want to see Ash in armor

all I want is simply a "yeah, you can put armor on her for all combat situations" then I'm 100% satisfied and I trust they will not put her in something ridiculous

#468
TheKillerAngel

TheKillerAngel
  • Members
  • 3 608 messages

littlezack wrote...

DaveExclamationMarkYognaut wrote...

littlezack wrote...

 As a guy who reads a lot of comic books, the concept of a woman in somewhat..revealing clothing isn't new to me. And yes, some of them are made up for pure titallation, but others still - Power GIrl, Wonder Woman, Black Canary, et cetera - can dress like they do and still come across as competent, strong, intelligent women, so long as they've got the right writer handling the job. 

Just because Ashley's in that dress, doesn't mean she automatically devolves into some mindless fawn. To assume that or anything close is just silly.


There's also the issue of mixed messages. You can have writing that tells you that a character is intelligent and competent, and visuals that tell you she's a sex object. But honestly, this debate has ocurred over and over again, and the question is less "does objectification exist?" (answer: yes) and more "how should people portray female characters in media?"


Hm. You make a civil argument. I will engage you, sir.

While I understand the argument against it, I think we do ourselves an injustice by moving over to the other extreme - surely, there is a limit, but I don't think every single woman in a videogame should dress like a nun. Some women prefer to dress sexy. That's their thing. People are more than what they dress - ultimately, it's what they do and how they act that defines them. I think we do ourselves a grave disservice by looking at a character design and immediately dismissing the character based on looks alone. The entire package should be taken into account.




Many women in video games are depicted in a manner that is patently objectifying. I think one of the best examples of this is Ivy from the Soul series (I really don’t need to provide a link, you should know this by now). Given that video gaming is a male-dominated industry, it’s somewhat expected that the male artists will create what other men have appetites for – which includes scantily clad women dressed to “impress” than for any other reason. But the extent to which this is taken is sometimes, rather appalling. It has varying degrees – some go as far as making characters like Ivy, and other characters are less sexualized. But what really bothers me are players who think this is how womenshould[/i] always be depicted, no matter what.

But I also believe that this doesn’t preclude games from having sexy or impractically dressed characters, male or female. Games, as a means of entertainment, are also a form of escapism and fantasy. Yes, women would never ever go into battle wearing high heels and clothing that is practically underwear. But some people find that appealing – the very impossibility that gaming allows lets us enjoy the unreasonable, a chance to flair our aesthetics and eschew realism. You can’t fight wearing whatever you want in real life, but you can in a game. In fantasy, aesthetics can mean more than realism, and some people will prefer that.I believe that the ultimate answer to this debate is by providing players with choice, a strategy that Guild Wars 2 adopts. Aaron Coberly, character art lead for Guild Wars 2, states the following:

I would like to say a quick word about where we stand when it comes to the “sexiness” of our armors and costumes. This is a controversial subject that I encounter frequently on forums and message boards—not just about Guild Wars[/i], but about a lot of games. I understand that many players feel that armor should be practical, realistic, and shouldn’t leave skin exposed to attack. When coming up with ideas for armor, the character and concept department try to balance the practical with the fantasy. We make armor that looks protective and functional, but we also make armor that looks sexy and shows a generous level of strategically placed skin. We recognize the “fantasy” aspect of our game; if you are able to rain down balls of fire from the sky, your clothing should not be a factor when it comes to body temperature, whether you are wearing your underwear or a fur coat. We’ve always intended to create outfits for male and female characters that are appealing and attractive without making our players feel uncomfortable about what their character or other player-characters are wearing. I think that Guild Wars[/i] has been very successful in this regard, and we will continue to make outfits that adhere to this philosophy.

It will be that some players prefer fashion over realism in video games, and others vice versa. And guess what? That’s totally OK in my book. I think there is a place for more female Shepards, just as there is a place for characters like Bayonetta. If you're completely against the depiction of characters like Bayonetta, I don't think a wholesale campaign to eradicate such characters will ever be successful, because gaming, just like music, art, film, or literature, is a projection of our imagination. In lots of music, men and women both sing about hypothetical lovers that transcend the limits of reality. 

The difference gaming has with these media is that it is far more recent (along with the fact that visual art, as a serious intellectual/artistic pursuit,  is arguably dead, but I digress). The other media I have mentioned have had a comparatively larger time to evolve, and thus more women develop them. Pornography has always existed, and I would bet it has generally (if not always) catered to men. So does "Tom Clancy" literature. But because more women are involved in print, we have fashion  magazines, romance novels, and erotic publications more dedicated towards women.

I think one of the deciding factors will be the number of women who work in the industry. As more women become game developers, we should see a greater variety in terms of the style, art direction, and manner in which women are portrayed. I think it could be very interesting – after all, women are much more fashion-conscious than men, so I think character design can only benefit from having more women in game development, especially in art.

Modifié par TheKillerAngel, 06 juillet 2011 - 01:19 .


#469
Phaedon

Phaedon
  • Members
  • 8 617 messages

javierabegazo wrote...

@Eromenos,

Perhaps your discussion is best suited for another thread, as it encompasses, not just Ash's look, but the look of females in general in Mass Effect games.

Eh, I was hoping to continue the debate. Though I see your point.

This has nothing to do with how women are portrayed in the MEverse. If the outfits of Samara or Miranda have been sexist, then the same applies to Jacob and Thane.

Bottom line is, this is the 21st century, and it appears as if people have been lucky enough to never learn what sexism is. 

"Sexism, also known as gender discrimination or sex discrimination, is the application of the belief or attitude that there are characteristics implicit to one's gender that indirectly affect one's abilities in unrelated areas."

In sort, it is to believe that a specific gender is born without the rights that the other has, and that equality is a lie.

Eye candy is obviously not exclusive to to a gender in the ME games. Even if it was, like earlier games (and especially RPGs a few years ago, when the market wasn't as politically correct), to call the artist the artist sexist makes it obvious that people have no idea what sexism is, and how serious it is. 

It's the equivalent to saying that GTA SA and everyone behind it is racist because they have an African American in the role of the gangster. 

There are of course limits to eye candy, but BSN has been rather contradictive concerning that.

They want nudity in romance scenes both with humans and non-humans for example.

#470
Phaedon

Phaedon
  • Members
  • 8 617 messages

crimzontearz wrote...

I do not even want to see Ash in armor

all I want is simply a "yeah, you can put armor on her for all combat situations" then I'm 100% satisfied and I trust they will not put her in something ridiculous

"We have only shown her jacket outfit" obviously refers to there being more outfits, and not having Ashley equipped with armour only under specific circumstances.

#471
crimzontearz

crimzontearz
  • Members
  • 16 788 messages

Phaedon wrote...

crimzontearz wrote...

I do not even want to see Ash in armor

all I want is simply a "yeah, you can put armor on her for all combat situations" then I'm 100% satisfied and I trust they will not put her in something ridiculous

"We have only shown her jacket outfit" obviously refers to there being more outfits, and not having Ashley equipped with armour only under specific circumstances.


sorry, I have learnt from past incidents that unless something is clearly spelled out then everything is as good as being still up in the air 

#472
Sparda Stonerule

Sparda Stonerule
  • Members
  • 613 messages
Not everything is about sex you know. I mean how many people really took Miranda on missions just to look at her? I personally stuck with Zaeed, Garrus, Thane, and Legion because I prefer squad mates with Sniper Riffles. If Ashley has a Sniper Riffle you better believe I'll be spending most of the game with her and Garrus.

I'm just saying this thread makes some of you (not all) look like all you think about is sex and its affect on people. There are plenty of people who can push past it and have a good time. But just because a woman looks good does not mean she is being exploited. It's wrong to believe that they are being used as just sex toys without looking at their personality. Every scantily clad woman in Mass Effect 2 had strong personalities. They weren't some easily swayed wilting flowers with demure personalities. They had opinions and beliefs and they voiced them.

Regardless of how a person looks it is always more interesting to analyze the personalities. The fact is when women are shoved into power suits they usually (not always) have flat personalities. The marines in Halo have no personality so they just changed the male outfit a little and stuck it on the female. Same goes for the Spartans. Sure Samus is a strong character but she barely has a personality. Anya barely has any characterization either. She was in the first Gears game and she was the person who relayed intel. Now she is fighting alongside the guys and is wearing armor. But she still has no character.

I was under the impression that characterization was more interesting and important to people. I guess I was sadly mistaken. I guess the outward appearance will always matter far too much for some people. It's kind of a sad commentary on society really, that outward appearance is more discussed than the personality of someone, be it a character or a real person. It was always disheartening to see someone tell a person in real life that they look silly in that or they shouldn't wear that because it isn't appropriate. Ah well, I guess you can't change humanity right?

On the subject of my feelings on the outfits, since I forgot to mention it. Kaidan looks good but I hope he has something lighter to wear. It would be odd to always see him in that. Not that I will, since he's dead. But still.

Ashley's outfit is fine as far as I can tell. Not really fit for gun fights but I have no clue what it's made of. I do want to see the armor though, it greatly interests me.

Vega just makes me laugh. I can't wait to see if they changed his face to make him look less derptastic. I mean I like that he's a big burly space marine, who will be thrust into a situation way above his head. However I do want him to look a little less silly.

Liara looks fine, but I would like some clarification as to what the headband is. I always assumed it was a Justicar symbol, but it could just as easily be a biotic amp or religious or even ceremonial. I shouldn't really assume something about an outfit piece until there is clarification.

#473
Phaedon

Phaedon
  • Members
  • 8 617 messages
It looks like that the most rational course of action that you should take then, crimzon, is accept the promise as a promise and be cautious.

We will know soon enough, won't we? As soon as the first screenshot with an armoured outfit is released and the enviroment doesn't seem too hazardrous, then that should be more than enough for a final confirmation.

Though your logic is still wrong anyway, this is not the first tweet about it, but you still only interpret the last one.

#474
crimzontearz

crimzontearz
  • Members
  • 16 788 messages
Sparda

there is only one reason why I used to put up with Miranda as a squaddie

She has both overload and Warp otherwise I would have permanently left her on the normandy (she is also sadly invaluable on insanity)

Her alternate costume makes her more than adequate but honestly her ridiculous looks (especially the goddamn high hells) made me want to chuck something at the screen each time she entered in my field of vision

#475
Il Divo

Il Divo
  • Members
  • 9 775 messages

Eromenos wrote...

Il Divo wrote...

Eromenos wrote...

Oh, let us see. In fantasy genre the males are oftentimes covered from head-to-toe. In cloth or furs at the least, if not leather and armor altogether. Absolute protection for the men? Mebbe. Mebbe not. Either way, their standard affords them the "most" protection in their setting in relation to women, obviously quite more than what is allowed for the buxom swordswoman you helpfully provided. You are so smart, she's exactly what I was referring to. :wizard:

I think there are some times in which men in fantasy wear less or little but...ratio-wise, I think it's a safe bet that women fighters in fantasy are kept in much skimpier(sp?) attire than their male counterparts. Exposure to...swords, fangs, poniards, elements, poisons, claws, and might I say the uncharitable naked eye as well. Does her...gear...equate to battle-worthiness in societies in which armor affords protection to a warrior or even to some mages who can hack it under the weight? I hope I do not have to point out the misogynistic hypocrisy in that there dynamic, but it was probably safer for me to mention it just in case.

Time to draw an analogy between that situation and the one in which Ashley Williams has found herself stuck in. Given some people's common sense regarding the value of tough surfaces providing a measure of defense for our bodies against all manner of tangible dangers, it would be unwise for a Marine/Spectre to execute her duties wearing a catsuit whose only strength is to serve titillation for any uncharitable eye.

Hmm. Hmmmmmm. Perhaps it would benefit you more to examine a pertinent sci-fi instance that is quite similar to Ashley's exploitation. Perhaps 2 of them!

http://i216.photobuc...pg?t=1267588864

Like Ashley, Seven and T'Pol are both women crewmembers of their respective scifi military ships. I really don't think this analogy should be too dense, but, but! Alas, I am no mind-reader. :)


You probably missed it while typing out your excessive essays, but I believe you were asked to stop posting this about two pages back.


I'm not sure what you're doing, but I am pretty sure I was staying on-topic about the wrongness of forcing a prominent female Marine grunt to wear a catsuit just to titillate the shooter-crowd. Pretty sure!

As to that, I compared her current situation to the way Seven and T'Pol were similarly exploited. Like those two, Ashley would benefit immensely by wearing a uniform appropriate for her job. In fact, she'd benefit much more because wearing armor provides her with life and not death as a shock trooper unlike the other two women whose jobs bear less guaranteed danger. :o Not that they don't face danger themselves...wedge-heels and corsets in their line of work can't be good either.


No, you're attempting to turn this into a debate about feminism. You can voice dislike of Ashley's new armor without references to 'exploitation of women' and 'Bioware are misogynists', and all the rest. You simply don't want to.

Modifié par Il Divo, 06 juillet 2011 - 01:37 .